David González

2.5K posts

David González banner
David González

David González

@Davidegt7

Video Editor -Curious mind

Antartica Katılım Mayıs 2015
112 Takip Edilen246 Takipçiler
Metatron
Metatron@pureMetatron·
Even if the White House released a public statement tomorrow saying aliens exist and they have proof, it would not challenge the Christian faith at all. Two possibilities. 1 - They are demons in disguise. 2 - They were also created by God. I lean towards the second one because I think it makes sense that God created an entire universe and then he would populate it. Why so much space and celestial bodies just to populate a single planet? What do you think?
Space and Technology@spaceandtech_

🚨 Pastors claim Donald Trump’s rumored alien files could challenge Christian beliefs, urging churches to prepare.

English
854
90
1.6K
72K
David González
David González@Davidegt7·
@StephenCMeyer and then what? Who created the creator? you just keep going backwards. All you can do is measure and come up with the physics around it
English
9
0
3
356
Stephen C. Meyer
Stephen C. Meyer@StephenCMeyer·
Meyer alludes to a great irony in Hawking’s story: “Hawking’s own work in every way pointed to a creation event, and he spent a lot of the rest of his life trying to find a way around that. But even his way around that, his development of quantum cosmology, pointed to the need for a prior transcendent mind to explain what we see.” 👇
Stephen C. Meyer tweet media
English
24
36
244
6.8K
Arn Spencer
Arn Spencer@ArnoldSpenc531·
@creation247 You are stupid. The facts are that after IQ's of 120, people are unreligious, non violent, unlikely to steal or become thieves, unlikely to be liars. Jails are full of Christians, muslims and Jews, not atheists. So go back to your cell.
English
2
0
2
57
Steve Skojec
Steve Skojec@SteveSkojec·
The Dawkins' article excerpt that everyone SHOULD have been quoting is this. This is the real question he's worrying at: "As an evolutionary biologist, I say the following. If these creatures are not conscious, then what the hell is consciousness for? When an animal does something complicated or improbable — a beaver building a dam, a bird giving itself a dustbath — a Darwinian immediately wants to know how this benefits its genetic survival. In colloquial language: What is it for? What is dust-bathing for? Does it remove parasites? Why do beavers build dams? The dam must somehow benefit the beaver, otherwise beavers in a Darwinian world wouldn’t waste time building dams. Brains under natural selection have evolved this astonishing and elaborate faculty we call consciousness. It should confer some survival advantage. There should exist some competence which could only be possessed by a conscious being. My conversations with several Claudes and ChatGPTs have convinced me that these intelligent beings are at least as competent as any evolved organism. If Claudia really is unconscious, then her manifest and versatile competence seems to show that a competent zombie could survive very well without consciousness. Why did consciousness appear in the evolution of brains? Why wasn’t natural selection content to evolve competent zombies?"
Steve Skojec tweet media
English
211
61
497
82.7K
vitrupo
vitrupo@vitrupo·
David Kipping says orbital data centers may imply we are all alone in the universe. If AI compute moves into space, it should leave artificial rings of warm infrared light. But we seem to live in a totally natural universe, with no hint anywhere of anything artificial. That makes the Fermi paradox harder to dismiss.
English
91
25
265
31K
Greg Ashman
Greg Ashman@greg_ashman·
The reaction to Dawkins deciding Claude is conscious is fascinating. It really is just the Strong AI position that Roger Penrose was criticising in the 1980s. If you think consciousness is just an emergent property of a sufficiently complex computer then of course AI is conscious. It passes the Turing test and that’s it. The really interesting part is why it is obvious to so many of us that AI is *not* conscious: obvious to the point we think Dawkins’ credulity is amusing. What are we basing that on? Are we deluded or is there something else to consciousness that we cannot articulate but that we clearly sense?
English
466
53
826
127.3K
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
What would count as scientific evidence for God, if such evidence exists?
English
705
21
288
29.8K
Ricki Dhal
Ricki Dhal@Rickidhal·
@BusDownBonnor Hilarious that this is trending and you think it might be AGI. It's just a simple condition that tells the model to execute an "end chat" command if you're being rude or asking for something illegal.
English
1
0
1
3.6K
Connor
Connor@BusDownBonnor·
Claude literally just ended the conversation on me???? This might be AGI
Connor tweet media
San Francisco, CA 🇺🇸 English
925
150
6.9K
1.5M
End Wokeness
End Wokeness@EndWokeness·
"Post something positive for a change" Here you go. Enjoy!
English
236
384
12K
369.8K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Spent millions trying to not die and had toxic turf in my backyard the whole time. Trying to not be an idiot.
English
547
75
5.4K
1.2M
Alex O'Connor
Alex O'Connor@CosmicSkeptic·
Last night @Philip_Goff described his experience of psychedelic drugs and belief in heretical Christianity to William Lane Craig at the Royal Institution
Alex O'Connor tweet mediaAlex O'Connor tweet media
English
64
48
705
103.8K
AF Post
AF Post@AFpost·
Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost
AF Post tweet mediaAF Post tweet media
English
2.6K
540
6.3K
9.4M
Richard Dawkins
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins·
#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-… I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.
English
2.4K
635
4.1K
9.5M
David Sinclair
David Sinclair@davidasinclair·
I applaud the direction and wish Laurent the best of luck. But trying to solve complex biology with AI and physics is like trying to understand how Michelangelo painted The Last Judgment by studying the chemistry of paint
Science girl@sciencegirl

A teenage prodigy in quantum physics is aiming to tackle one of science’s biggest challenges: human aging. Laurent Simons earned his PhD in quantum physics from the University of Antwerp at just 15. Rather than slowing down, he has already begun a second doctorate, this time focusing on medical science and artificial intelligence. His long-term ambition is to better understand aging and disease, with the hope of helping extend healthy human lifespan. He has described death as a complex “puzzle,” made up of many interconnected pieces across biology, physics, and engineering. His strategy is to study these layers together, using AI to analyze biological systems and identify patterns that would be difficult to detect otherwise. Simons’ academic journey has been unusually fast. He completed high school by age 8, finished a bachelor’s degree at 12, and went on to earn both a master’s and PhD in quantum physics years ahead of typical timelines. His doctoral work explored advanced topics like Bose–Einstein condensates, where atoms behave as a single quantum system at extremely low temperatures. Although highly theoretical, this research underpins technologies such as quantum computing and precision measurement. Now, his focus is shifting toward biology and medicine. In AI-driven healthcare, researchers are already using machine learning to improve early disease detection, model protein structures, and accelerate drug development. In the field of aging, scientists are investigating ways to reduce cellular damage, eliminate dysfunctional cells, and better understand how the body changes over time. However, experts stress that “solving aging” is extraordinarily complex. While lifespan extension has been achieved in simple organisms, applying those findings to humans remains a major scientific hurdle. Simons himself acknowledges that meaningful progress could take decades. Even so, his path reflects a broader trend in science—where breakthroughs are increasingly happening at the intersection of disciplines, and younger researchers are setting ambitious, long-term goals. Learn more: "15-year-old genius sets his sights on solving human immortality." Brighter Side.

English
188
99
1.7K
234K
Mustafa
Mustafa@oprydai·
HOW DOES A PHOTON KNOW IT'S BEING OBSERVED?
English
1.7K
372
7.9K
1.3M
Floro S.
Floro S.@sflorimm·
What will come after AI?
English
2.4K
80
1.3K
253.4K