Piper75

@thecreasedive @RyanWellner Can college lacrosse programs do us a favor though? Can they please put the campera on the other side of the stadium so the place doesnt look empty?

The environment looks incredible. Think we need more game in Chicago.

King Charles III—as Supreme Governor of the Church of England and "Defender of the Faith”…a man sworn to uphold one specific Christian establishment while indulging in syncretic spiritual tourism (he has long expressed admiration for aspects of Islam, quoted the Quran positively, and patronized Islamic studies). This is not enlightened tolerance but performative dhimmitude mixed with New Age mush, the sort of thing a lightweight prince-turned-king does to signal cosmopolitan virtue while the realm's historic identity is overtaken by an intrusive and destructive force. Charles's personal religious preferences or messaging schedule embody the grand "fall" of Britain. The monarchy was always theater; expecting it to robustly defend Christian Britain is like expecting the Queen of Hearts to enforce logic. The specific pattern—diluted or absent robust Christian messaging at Easter/Christmas (often laced with interfaith nods to "shared Abrahamic values," "faith, hope, and love" across traditions, or praise for compassion "echoed in Islam"), contrasted with straightforward, appreciative Ramadan/Eid greetings that rarely (if ever) insert Christian theology… It’s craven appeasement and demographic realism, not equality. Note the Asymmetry: Christianity, the historic faith of the land and the monarch's sworn duty, gets universalized and softened to avoid offense; Islam gets respectful particularism. This isn't neutral pluralism; it's elite accommodation to a growing, assertive minority whose faith makes fewer concessions to doubt, satire, or separation of mosque and state. Why do Western elites bend over backward for Islam while treating residual Christianity as fair game for mockery…classic "one-way multiculturalism" that screams weakness. The 'Defender of the Faith' can't bring himself to defend *his* faith without genuflecting to the one that explicitly rejects its central claims and whose scriptures command dominion. Meanwhile, a polite 'Eid Mubarak' flows without reciprocal theology. This is not tolerance; it's the nervous tic of a civilization that no longer believes in itself, curtsying to the stronger horse in the stable. This is intellectual and cultural suicide.

@Palestine_River @masuzafi Then why do you live in the UK clown? Go back to your home country wherever that is

@masuzafi Britian was built on slavery and theft / it will never have a great economy

"Tucker Confronts Piers Morgan: 'You Don’t Produce Anything!' on the UK’s Struggling Economy"

@0QoaHWNltNDwivZ You people (or bots) dont understand this company at all. It’s a Gain on Sale consumer loan company getting affiliated entities to buy their loans so they can mark up the values that are on their b/s.

@DePiper75 ボットではありません。日本の普通の投資家です。少しずつ買ってます。

$SOFI 30株購入しました。少しずつ買い増し♪出来るだけ株数を増やしておこう。 #SOFI #TSLA

@FlammShaun @QualCompounders Spending $500k to buy stock at $15 after making $50mm? LOL. His total comp + stock sales + options + what he made at twitter…. It’s an irrelevant amount of $$$ for him

@DePiper75 @QualCompounders Why’s that matter?

The $SOFI bear case requires believing that federal regulators are completely asleep. 🏦 The Accusations: Muddy Waters and Steve Eisman claim "financial engineering" is masking true charge-off rates (alleging 6.1% vs 2.9% reported). They argue this will freeze $SOFI's ability to sell loans and kill growth. The Reality Check: 🔷Regulation: $SOFI is a bank holding company. For this to be true, the OCC and Fed would have to miss $312M in "unrecorded debt" and systemic accounting fraud. 🔷Conviction: Muddy Waters disclosed they intended to cover their short immediately after publishing. That’s a hit-and-run, not a long-term conviction play. 🔷Track Record: Eisman is a legend for 2008, but he's been "early" (and wrong) on everything from Canadian banks to Tesla for years. A broken clock is right twice a day. 📌I do not buy the bear arguments Anthony Noto bough 1M dollars of shares after the short attacks. What are your thoughts?🤔

@Kenmegan44 Another $SOFI bot

$SOFI It's time! Tomorrow is the big day. The next level of innovation. Big changes. Bold upgrades. Believe the hype.🔥🔥🔥

@QualCompounders @FlammShaun The guy has made $50mm from the company. STOP

@FlammShaun Correct which is very bullish.

@Dboybruh Another SOFI bot

- aaaand were green $SoFi 🥹 the shares you’ve accumulated during this recent sell off will be seen as such a gift in the future

Have you read the short report from Muddy Waters? Also, mgmt raised capital at $27.50 in December…and didnt have a good reason as to why. Theyre clearly loosening credit standards. Each securitization shows worsening credit stats. They also tripped a securitization trigger in Dec

I can’t seem to find any explanation on this $SOFI drop.. Maybe it is overvalued at $30, but $15 now seriously? Can someone explain to me?

@truckdrive7z @SickosCommittee Except he didnt. He was in the game!

@SickosCommittee Immediately bitching about the guy who ran off the bench is perfect Duke form

@pigskinpetey @SickosCommittee @dukepbp He wasnt correct. The guy was in the game!

@SickosCommittee @dukepbp disclaimer you are correct by rule. But again, what i said stands.

@upstreamlax Actually theres about a 40% chance of that. Johnson is formerly from Yale…. They were a middling team but still talked huge trash all the time

There's like a 99.9% chance that #50 or some other Michigan kid had been running their mouths at Johnson all game. Score the goal, call him a pussy, move on. Fair play

@MoneyPuckdotcom How are there 9 teams in the East with >50% odds?

Playoff odds as of Sunday. moneypuck.com/predictions.htm

@MoneyPuckdotcom How can there be 10 teams in the east with over a 50% chance of making the playoffs?

Updated playoff chances after Isles won and Sens lost this afternoon. moneypuck.com/predictions.htm

@Lakeviewfam01 SOFI bot account. This is absurd

$SOFI Not a conspiracy theorist, but fact of the matter is - conspiracies do happen all the time. Not naming the firm behind the recent SoFi short ambush because they are clearly terrible and deserve no sunlight whatsoever.. Just the timing of the attack - smack bang in the middle of a down market and an increasingly more uncertain macro reeks of something fishy. For some reason these guys got a prime time slot on cnbc to go make their short case is so left field. It was as though cnbc was having a slow news month and was short of time talking points to fill their air time at this time. And the fact that most of their arguments has been debunked many times over by the incredibly knowledgeable SoFi retail.. So we have a very dubious firm making an extremely flimsy bearish case about SoFi at what is already an extremely delicate time (in so far as the market is concerned). We have to keep in mind - most of these short sellers - their disproportionately high public profile notwithstanding - are light weight operations with maybe a dozen employees in a rented out office. They themselves don’t have the financial wherewithal to make big $$ bets to profit from their reports. Most of the time - they are funded by other larger players (hedge funds, other entities) who have a much larger agenda. We have no shortage of dubious players on the public and private markets For them to ignore them all and spend their valuable time and funding to actually target SoFi.. Someone very wise once said - if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it a bleeping duck. Something is brewing against SoFi.

@ColesTrades Must be another bot account. No understanding of the company

$SOFI Fundamentals are intact. Sentiment is at all time lows. Currently being shorted. I’M ALL IN! 🚀🚀

@JesseVerdier @MarketMatrixs I wouldnt wait!

@MarketMatrixs If it ever makes it back to $25 I’m selling it all! I’m done with this piece of shit stock!

$SOFI 5 years ago: Stock price: $16 Revenue: $1.01B Net income: Loss EBITDA: $28-$31M Members: 3.46M $SOFI now: Stock price: $16 Revenue: $3.61B (3x) Net income: $481M EBITDA: $1.92B Members: 13.7M (4x) Anything under $18 is an absolute gift. Undervalued is an understatement.

@MarketMatrixs EBITDA LOL. It’s a financial svcs company that relies on capital and GoS to produce earnings. Theres a reason no bank or mtge company uses EBITDA to tell you how they’re doing. This is a farc

@Futurenvesting LOL. Why you think they raised capital when they did? Hint….Cause they need it. You people really dont understand this company

Hear me out... $SOFI raised $1.6b at the end of 2025 at a share price of $27.50. The stock has dropped 42.3% since the last raise! Is it time to issue a stock buyback with the capital you raised? $SOFI issued ~58m shares. $SOFI has the opportunity to buy back ~100.5m shares using the $1.6b they just raised. SoFi would end up with the same amount of cash as before the raise, but with ~42.5 million fewer shares outstanding. This effectively undoes the dilution and provides an additional bonus reduction in share count, making each remaining share represent a larger percentage of the company. Anthony Noto would only do this if they believe they couldn't use the capital more effectively. That said, dilution has been a drag on the sentiment of this company, and this might be a creative way to get excitement back into the stock and raise EPS.