David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️

134.3K posts

David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️ banner
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️

David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️

@Delikwu

Author of ‘Sovereign’. I help 40k people be more productive, creative, and decisive at https://t.co/XhkemQ91ye. CSO, Product strategy, ex Corporate law

Read my book ➜ Katılım Mayıs 2012
912 Takip Edilen10.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️@Delikwu·
Today my book Sovereign finally launches. It’s a handbook for outsiders ready to bend reality in their favour. It’s a manual for making things happen, and a guide to creating the outcomes you want. Sovereign will show you how to (1) nurture ambition, (2) develop agency, and (3) navigate adversity, regardless of your starting point. One reader called it: “A manual for life - modern stoicism at its best” Others have called it “Clear, useful, and entirely uninterested in gimmicks, and “Refreshingly sane”. A year ago I decided to write the best book I was capable of, distilling the last five years of my work and so much more. It’s been an incredible journey. Buy Sovereign today to... • Stop following the default path and learn to architect a life on your own terms. 🗺️ • Break through self-imposed limits by understanding how to rewrite the rules you quietly accepted. • Build the practical toolkit of trailblazers—from faster learning to authentic influence—to make your vision a reality. • Turn inevitable adversity into your greatest training ground for resilience and strength. 💪 You can get it on Amazon today (and a bunch of other places)
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️ tweet mediaDavid Elikwu FRSA ⚔️ tweet media
English
5
14
50
18.9K
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
If Spain beat England in the World Cup Final and then Andy Burnham is installed as the first Catholic Prime Minister, we may never recover
English
0
0
0
201
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@adje__ This is re council tax bandings which were largely fixed a very long time ago, and property values have changed massively since then. So in areas where houses are v. lucrative people can still pay next to nothing bc of their historic housing band not their house / local council.
English
0
0
0
49
Joe Weisenthal
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart·
One thing that really makes AI writing distinct is the lack commas. Anyway here’s the CEO of Airbnb posting about blockchain stuff.
English
69
28
1.3K
383.5K
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@matt_teeixeira @haider1 I’m part of the chart lol. Anthropic keeps shooting itself in the foot and there are tons of active daily AI users who just needed an excuse as good at 5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna to switch. Did not use Codex at all before and now it’s on every device I own.
English
1
0
0
33
Liz Wessel
Liz Wessel@lizwessel·
I will shout this from the rooftop til the day I die: when someone makes an intro to you for literally any reason, circling back after the meeting to share how it went will get the introducer to make many more intro’s in the future. There is no downside except 1 min of your time.
English
19
24
512
24.2K
Isa
Isa@isausmanov·
The agentic phone that won OpenAI Hackathon is replacing my iPhone feature by feature. Found Amjad Masad’s contact, emailed Paul Graham, and called on my behalf to reschedule a meeting. Its KPI is how little time I have to spend on it while getting more done.
English
136
78
1.7K
227.4K
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@Conor_D_Dart Afaik OpenAI raised more aggressively early to secure compute as they were focused on consumer market share. Anthropic was more cautious with balance and risk of overspending + focused on enterprise. Now models are more powerful they’re scrambling for more compute.
English
1
0
5
179
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@RylanSchaeffer Not just me then! Claude / Fable is great when it’s actually working - but most of the time it downgrades or finds a reason not to work. Perplexing. ChatGPT Sol meanwhile cranks and I’m not even on max plan yet thanks to usage limit resets.
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️@Delikwu

Generational fumble from Anthropic making @claudeai latest models so pious, pedantic and paternalistic. Completely unusable. It refuses to do some tasks, pretends to do others, reinterprets instructions, etc. FAR too much anthropomorphism. Finally downgraded to Pro. Codex >>>

English
0
0
0
308
Rylan Schaeffer
Rylan Schaeffer@RylanSchaeffer·
Finally switched from Claude to Codex. Two reasons: 1. Fable (in Web) kept redirecting to 4.8. I don't want to spend my days arguing with a model or asking it to rephrase my prompts to be acceptable 2. 5.6 Sol is a beast at attacking coding problems
English
98
77
3K
242.2K
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
Generational fumble from Anthropic making @claudeai latest models so pious, pedantic and paternalistic. Completely unusable. It refuses to do some tasks, pretends to do others, reinterprets instructions, etc. FAR too much anthropomorphism. Finally downgraded to Pro. Codex >>>
English
0
0
1
511
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
lol nah my English lit teacher was a racist cow who thought I plagiarised with no proof and refused to mark my work the entire year. I stopped showing up to class and got perfect exam scores (both English lang and lit) when downgraded to an A because she game me a B on coursework. She couldn’t read into a pile of poo. Cancerous wretch.
English
0
0
1
354
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@homsiT Ironically the fix is mostly just trying to put things back as they were before! 😅 I struggle to remember what issues I had with the algorithm pre-Elon as most of them seem more recent.
English
0
1
2
34
Max Rovensky
Max Rovensky@MaxRovensky·
iPhone 15 Pro Night Mode (3s) No edits
Max Rovensky tweet media
English
4
1
28
12.9K
Lorenzo Valente
Lorenzo Valente@LorenzoARK·
My thesis on dishwashers: why you should have either 0 or 2 at home, because 1 is utterly useless I think the longest-standing fight between my wife and me is about the utility and usefulness of a dishwasher. I think dishwashers are the most useless appliances on Earth; obviously, she loves ours. My argument is super simple: if there are fewer than three people at home, adults, not kids, you are better off, by pretty much any metric, washing the dishes by hand. To me, the whole process of pre-washing them, putting them inside the dishwasher, and then taking them out, sometimes still drying them, and putting them back on the shelves is utterly ridiculous and defeats the whole purpose. I just hate having to take them out the next day and put them back on the shelves. I would rather wash everything by hand in 10 minutes and get it over with. Over time, though, I have slowly realized that what my wife really hates is having dirty dishes in sight. She just hates it: the smell, the way they look, everything. So I have come to this conclusion: you should either own 0 dishwashers or 2. Having 1 makes no sense. Why 2? You start loading one dishwasher until it is full. Once you turn it on, you start using the second one. When the first one is clean, you simply take the clean dishes directly from it, effectively using the dishwasher as their storage place. Once the second one is full, you run it and start using the first one again. This really solves both problems: you never have to leave dirty dishes in the sink, but at the same time, you never have to take all the clean dishes out of the dishwasher and put them away.
English
374
17
596
273K
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@babayagatwt Bureaucracy and an aversion to risk. The only ones who can bravely take risks are newcomers. Hence Amazon, Microsoft, Apple largely giving up. Google could leverage its data and services better, but it has to be more careful as alienating people could kill existing revenues.
English
0
0
2
94
baba yaga
baba yaga@babayagatwt·
I still can’t figure out why Gemini struggles to compete with Claude and GPT. - Owns Chrome - Backed by Android - Stores most search results - Holds ~95% search history - Google has the biggest user data - Even incognito data isn’t fully private So what’s the problem?
English
1.4K
375
10.5K
1.9M
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@kylekuzma It can be a bit more complex below the surface
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️@Delikwu

Bad idea and shouldn’t happen. The reason is simple - most players get traded. If you can get traded but you have a small stake in a particular team, you effectively have a sports betting problem. Players shouldn’t be allowed to own shares of any team while actively playing. Imagine knowing you could bump the stock of a smaller team by moving there. Buy the stock, demand the trade. Or you’ve been traded unwillingly and are playing the team whose shares you hold in a final. If your team wins you get nothing. If you lose, you make bank. Etc etc. Two ways to make it work: 1. Player equity option pool. The league might have and set aside some shares players can earn over the course of their careers. Play longer, get more. And they’re options so you can choose to buy them. You can only exercise on retirement but strike price is from when they were awarded (you still get the gain from when you got them until you use them). 2. Team equity options: Players on a team for more than x period of time, or who join on a rookie contract, are automatically awarded x number of options. It’s all tenure based and you can’t buy any more unless you join a new team for x period, or you retire. These are both workable ideas but I don’t think teams will go for it, because they already effectively split profit with players. All the new TV money and deals that benefit the league mostly pass on through player salaries anyway - or so teams will claim. Players only get upside when playing for a team and no downside if investing in a team that doesn’t do well. You still get paid. Shareholders may get much less in that period. The lowest paid player could make more than a minority owner during their stint in a team. The only players who think differently are superstars who know they’re had a direct, marked, and prolonged impact on a team through jersey and ticket sales etc.

English
0
0
0
213
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@stevemagness Steve it’s worse – Tuchel did not make this critique! The journo was just stirring up trouble. The same journo opened his interview w/ Tuchel with a made up quote that he had to defend, and it went downhill from there. Then he turns around and poisons player relationships. Nasty
English
0
0
0
48
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
@RichardHanania Brother you should’ve kept this one in the drafts. What do you mean you can’t write / read your handwriting? You know this is a skill you can just decide to get better at?
English
0
0
0
49
Matt Van Swol
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol·
I’m sorry, but Lindsey Graham dying out of the blue like this doesn’t make any sense at all. We have him on camera yesterday looking perfectly healthy. None of this is making any sense…
English
23.6K
11.2K
66.4K
7.7M
David Elikwu FRSA ⚔️
Bad idea and shouldn’t happen. The reason is simple - most players get traded. If you can get traded but you have a small stake in a particular team, you effectively have a sports betting problem. Players shouldn’t be allowed to own shares of any team while actively playing. Imagine knowing you could bump the stock of a smaller team by moving there. Buy the stock, demand the trade. Or you’ve been traded unwillingly and are playing the team whose shares you hold in a final. If your team wins you get nothing. If you lose, you make bank. Etc etc. Two ways to make it work: 1. Player equity option pool. The league might have and set aside some shares players can earn over the course of their careers. Play longer, get more. And they’re options so you can choose to buy them. You can only exercise on retirement but strike price is from when they were awarded (you still get the gain from when you got them until you use them). 2. Team equity options: Players on a team for more than x period of time, or who join on a rookie contract, are automatically awarded x number of options. It’s all tenure based and you can’t buy any more unless you join a new team for x period, or you retire. These are both workable ideas but I don’t think teams will go for it, because they already effectively split profit with players. All the new TV money and deals that benefit the league mostly pass on through player salaries anyway - or so teams will claim. Players only get upside when playing for a team and no downside if investing in a team that doesn’t do well. You still get paid. Shareholders may get much less in that period. The lowest paid player could make more than a minority owner during their stint in a team. The only players who think differently are superstars who know they’re had a direct, marked, and prolonged impact on a team through jersey and ticket sales etc.
English
2
0
1
782
dank
dank@cptdankkk·
Jaylen Brown says players should be able to own equity in teams because they help increase the value of NBA franchises “Players should be able to invest alongside ownership groups and business opportunities. I don't understand why that’s ever been a thing. It's like you’re an athlete and they make it seem like they can control how much wealth or growth that you could actually accumulate. I think that's wrong” “I also think that any other major corporation, if you work for Apple, Nike or anywhere, if you're a CEO, if you're someone who has been on a board for a large amount of time, you get equity in a company at some point. You are part of it” “I think athletes should be looked at in the same way. You played for the Celtics for 20 years, you should get a piece of equity because you helped accumulate the growth. That's the part that gets lost in translation. The sweat equity you put in. You get compensated for doing your job, but you don't get compensated for the growth. At major corporations and companies you do, or at least some of the big ones”
English
1.1K
1.8K
12.3K
3M