Dymril
5.9K posts







Let me tell you why a Muslim would stab a random Jewish person on the streets of London. I was raised Muslim, and I know exactly why this happens. It’s not a reaction to the war in Gaza. It’s not oppression. It’s not radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of Islam itself. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Muslim or not, we as human beings carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough, and we spend our life trying to redeem ourself through good deeds, thinking it will make the suffocating guilt go away. Christianity for example offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s. Salvation isn’t earned, it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself, because Christ already did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love. And when a Christian feels lost, broken, and in need of forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they are forgiven. Islam, on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption, it weaponizes guilt. Instead of providing salvation, Allah exposes you, holds your sins over your head, and threatens you with hellfire and torture in the grave. The Quran isn’t a book of peace, it’s a book of threats. It bullies Muslims into obedience through fear, humiliation, and punishment. So what happens when a Muslim seeks redemption? They try to be better Muslims. They pray, fast, give to charity, go on Hajj, do everything Allah commands. But it never works. I know it. I did it. And no matter how much you pray, no matter how much you try, the guilt never goes away. Because deep down, every Muslim knows it’s not enough. Allah always demands more. Allah loves those who die fighting against the infidels. That’s not an opinion, it’s in the Quran, in Hadith, in every lesson taught to children. This is why Muslims, even the so-called "moderates," always hesitate to condemn terrorism. Because they know jihad is required by Allah. They might not be willing to commit it themselves, but they can't say it’s wrong. So when a Muslim fails to reach peace through religious rituals, they have two choices: Give up, stop being devout, and learn to live with the guilt, or commit to jihad, because that’s the only way to be true to yourself. The Quran spells it out clearly: “Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet” (9:29). So when a Muslim embraces this identity fully, killing infidels isn’t just justified, it’s joyful. It’s an act of: Saving yourself, obeying Allah, securing your eternity, finally escaping the crushing weight of guilt This is why a Muslim can stab a random jewish person on the streets and feel nothing but satisfaction. Because for the first time in his life, he finally believes he has done something worthy of redemption.


Have you heard the story of Israel offering Palestinian Arab refugees who fled the 1948 war the chance to return — with compensation — just weeks after the fighting ended? That’s exactly what happened at the 1949 Lausanne Conference, the UN-backed attempt to broker peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Here’s the pattern that has defined the conflict for 76 years. The Arab delegations (Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan) refused to even sit in the same room as Israeli representatives. For five months there were no direct talks. They would not recognize Israel as a legitimate negotiating partner. Israel offered to repatriate 100,000 Arab refugees, pay compensation for abandoned lands, release frozen Arab bank accounts, and discuss family reunifications. Israeli delegates also signed the May 12 Protocol accepting the principle of partition. The Arabs rejected everything. They insisted the refugees must return not as citizens seeking peace, but “as masters of the homeland” — explicitly to annihilate the Jewish state. Egypt’s Foreign Minister declared in 1949: “The Arabs intend… to annihilate the State of Israel.” Baghdad Radio broadcast the same message: the Jews were enemies “irrespective of how peace-seeking their intentions may be,” and the Arabs were preparing “the day of vengeance.” The refugees became permanent pawns. Arab states (except Jordan) refused them citizenship, kept them in camps, and weaponized their suffering. The “right of return” was never humanitarian — it was demographic warfare to destroy the Jewish state from within. This was not a one-off. It was the blueprint. 18 years later the Arab League made it explicit at Khartoum: no recognition with Israel, no negotiation of Israel, no peace with Israel. Meanwhile, Israel absorbed around 600,000 Jewish refugees ethnically cleansed from Arab lands — with no UN agency, no generational camps, and no international sympathy. 76 years later the same rejectionist strategy continues, just in new language. The goal has never changed: they will accept no Jewish state in the Middle East, ever.



Ma soprattutto chi è il tizio che ferma ed estromette dal corteo l’attivo pro-Europa e pro-Ucraina? È Giacomo Marchetti, di Contropiano.org, un giornalaccio on-line russobruno. Marchetti è fan del regime della Corea del Nord. Qui una sua corrispondenza: contropiano.org/altro/2019/10/…



Casualties in Gaza are "75%-80 women and children", says @FranceskAlbs, a complete lie. Not even Hamas has ever claimed such a high figure, and its own fabricated "70% women and children" has been debunked and retracted by Hamas itself. Deaths are overwhelmingly male and combat age. Nobody bats an eye. Pure desinformation again, certified by three universities. /3 x.com/mboudry/status…






BREAKING: The IRGC has been caught using child soldiers at checkpoints in Iran. Suddenly, nobody brings up the Geneva Convention. Weird.

Gazan residents claim, “There is no baby formula for infants in Gaza.” Meanwhile, footage from Gazan activists shows that Hamas stole tons of infant formula, hid it in Ministry of Health warehouses, and dumped it to worsen the hunger crisis and pressure Israel.






.@Guardian: “Francesca Albanese accuses [UN Watch] of hounding her husband, Massimiliano Calì, a senior economist at the World Bank, in a campaign that led to him being removed from his lead position running its Syria file. “The World Bank was completely craven,” Albanese says. “He has stellar records of performance in all his positions.” 🔗 theguardian.com/law/2026/apr/1…



