Tim Donovan #FBPE 🔶💙

WAS WIDDECOMBE SILENCED BY MI5 ESTABLISHMENT HIT? At 8 o’clock on the day she was brutally murdered, Ann Widdecombe was interviewed on TalkTV, during which she raised the subject of hidden “establishment powers.” According to the police report, she was killed just four hours later. Fellow MP Nigel Farage—no stranger to death threats himself—has called her killing premeditated, noting that a suspicious car had been seen on her driveway shortly before the attack. Meanwhile, online chatter is drawing Jill Dando parallels. With no evidence of burglary or any obvious motive, the quick suspect releases, and the isolated Dartmoor strike point—everything suggests this was a professional black op assassination.

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

England fans are acting like there was 0 controversy surrounding this play vs Norway. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇳🇴 I don’t want to hear any complaining when you guys play Argentina. 🇦🇷 Let me explain. 👇🏾

The day after Yesterday! A principal discussion - nothing to do with England: 1. The ball hits the wire of the Spidercam a) players and the bench react instantly b) video-technology from different channels show it 2. FIFA say it did not hit the wire So two simple questions that need to be answered: Does FIFA lie? Is the technology NOT working?

El balón sí tocó el cable de la cámara y cayó en el regazo de un miembro del equipo inglés, lo que permitió el gol de Bellingham contra Noruega. La FIFA afirma que no se registró contacto: “El sensor de latido del balón conectado no tiene señal”. El equipo de Noruega también lo reportó al árbitro. ¿Había intenciones ocultas de la FIFA contra Noruega?

How do you stop the game for that?! Two English players run into each other. 🇳🇴🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Norwegian player gets a YELLOW?! WILD.

Norway! 🇳🇴 ⚽️👊🏼

People are often critical of Victoria Beckham but to see this outpouring of emotion here from her as England scores a goal shows her deep connection with both football and the team.