Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom
115.6K posts

Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

Now we’ve established that Peter Murrell is a liar, could we maybe revisit his evidence to the Alex Salmond inquiry when he claimed he was distracted by magpies in his garden rather than being coached on his evidence by someone off-camera?
thescottishsun.co.uk/news/politics/…

English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

I posted this during the week but I'm doing it again because it's absolutely staggering.
@AngelaRayner can claim £40,000 in direct office expenses and a further £240,000 for "staff costs" etc.
She's also been gifted another quarter of a million quid from "supporters" to cover even more "office expenses".
In total it comes to over £500,000 per year.
Or £10,000 PER WEEK.
FOR OFFICE EXPENSES.
A UK pensioner is expected to survive on just £12,500 PER YEAR.
That's just 9 days worth of Angela Rayners "office expenses".
Are you OK with that?

English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

If the state actively subsidises goods, the cost of the subsidy is not just the value of the discount paid by the state and therefore the taxpayer.
The cost also includes the state machinery required to administer the subsidy, which requires even more state spending and taxation.
Capping prices therefore inevitably increases overall costs when all other consequences are taken into account.
English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

Say it loud, say it clear.
"Excluding trans people from single sex spaces means only that they must use the single sex spaces of their own immutable sex, just as they did before the advent of The Great Gender Nonsense"
andrew dotchin tssf (he/him) & suffolkvicar.bsky@suffolkvicar
Say it loud, say it clear ‘Excluding trans peoples from single sex spaces will not make c!s women safer.’
English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

I've had an idea.
Hear me out.
Y'know how men are responsible for 99% of all sexual crimes, all rapes, 93% of all murders, 90% of violent crime & 85% of all domestic abuse?
A sexual assault happens every 35 seconds. 75% of survivors still suffer from PTSD a month later. 50% a year later.
How about, in facilities where women are vulnerable, we have separate male's & female's?
Nobody would object to that surely?

English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

This guy had his bike stolen and traced it down to a house. The bike’s been there for over 12 hours, but listen to how the police acted and the attitude! They say they can’t do anything because the back gate is open and there’s no other evidence. He then argues with the man, who clearly just wants justice for his stolen bike. The British police are an absolute joke.
English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

"Well Josh, did your Mum happen to mention that she'll be able to save £1.64 on the family entry to Legoland during the summer"?
"Yes Mr Starmer, and she asked me pass on her thanks. She told me to tell you she plans to take us twice in the holidays. That way she'll save over £3 which will be enough to buy a can of coke for us all to share".
"That's marvellous Josh. I'm happy to help".

English
Edith Pender-hiom retweetledi

There is no law that prevents anyone either asking someone their sex, or pointing out they are in the wrong facility for their sex.
It is not ‘special category data’. No data is being ‘processed’.
Did they really think women would let this pass unnoticed?
Sex Matters@SexMattersOrg
NEW: We have written to the Minister for Women and Equalities Bridget Phillipson, calling on her to withdraw the “asking about sex” section of the EHRC code of practice for service providers because it is legally wrong.
English















