Amos / Draw Near
10.8K posts

Amos / Draw Near
@DrawNear_
✝️🩸🌎 | 🎓Public HS history educator, Charlotte Mason homeschooler 📖 | Devo/doctrinal cartoonist | 💍 w/ 👧👦👦 | USN Vet | F3 Toll House | 🍑 GA






Michael Heiser justifying the elitist, pseudo-Gnostic hermeneutic he uses to reinterpret Scripture—a hermeneutic which apparently requires modern scholars to recover the Bible’s “real meaning” after the church somehow remained blind to it for nearly 2,000 years: “Seeing the Bible through the eyes of an ancient reader requires shedding the filters of our traditions and presumptions. They processed life in supernatural terms. Today’s Christian processes it through a mixture of creedal statements and modern rationalism.” “There’s no doubt that Psalm 82 can rock your biblical worldview. Once I saw what it was actually saying, I was convinced that I needed to look at the Bible through ancient eyes, not my traditions.”



@DrawNear_ What would you say is the most significant insight into the things of God this book offers, and why? Can you support it with scripture


While we absolutely praise God for this beautiful testimony of internal physical healing, Flowers’ posts expose an insurmountable logical double-standard in his #Nicodeism framework: when he requests prayer and offers praise here, what does he believe God actually did? Since Leighton publicly mocks the internal supernatural work of spiritual regeneration by comparing it to an invasive "surgeon sneaking into your room at night to cut open your chest" his own natural-minded, Nicodemus logic should force him to mock this internal physical healing by that exact same caricature. Leighton is trapped; he is either praising the patient’s autonomous Will for generating its own recovery, or he is functionally asking for prayer... and giving praise... exactly like #Calvinism who rejoices that the Sovereign Sustainer can heal a creature from the inside out without violating its personhood. @Soteriology101🤝Inconsistancy























