John D

1.7K posts

John D

John D

@N704EK

East Tennessee Katılım Mart 2011
127 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
EngineerGaming125
EngineerGaming125@EngiGaming125·
@AztecCrewElder @N704EK @TRussHunter No, but we do have the original radio messages that, from what I understand of them, originally contained radio traffic confirming the ships identity as American but still being given the attack order before the recordings were censored to remove that info
English
2
0
0
11
David Scott Harris
David Scott Harris@HVNYrefugee·
One of these is @RepThomasMassie’s district in north Kentucky. The other is near the border of Poland in northeast Slovakia. But which is which?
David Scott Harris tweet mediaDavid Scott Harris tweet media
English
5
0
3
373
John D retweetledi
Pro-America | Politics & Markets
Most of Massie's supporters don't even know he's lost yet. It's only 5:46 AM in Pakistan.
English
483
2.8K
26.8K
246.4K
John D
John D@N704EK·
@lsanger There is a reason Mormons love him so much.
English
2
0
1
29
John D
John D@N704EK·
@lsanger I appreciate you taking this on. In the cult's defense though, Heiser said a lot of contradictory things and he was often vague. For example: he would declare his ideas are not supportive of Mormonism and then go on to teach things that completely support Mormonism.
English
1
0
0
171
Larry Sanger
Larry Sanger@lsanger·
I am DONE correcting the many, many mistakes of Heiser's fan club. Wow. Just shoot me if I ever gain followers like that.
English
31
1
50
3.2K
John D
John D@N704EK·
@HVNYrefugee What is the secret to this? Where you completely immune to the influence or did you struggle?
English
0
0
0
4
John D
John D@N704EK·
@5Solas2 But he said he isn't a gnostic so...
English
2
0
3
179
John D
John D@N704EK·
@DrawNear_ If the books of Moses were actually written during the Babylonian captivity and weren't inspired by God in any meaningful way then it would make sense to think they were just reacting to the surrounding religions. Annus's work would be relevant.
English
1
0
0
21
Amos / Draw Near
Amos / Draw Near@DrawNear_·
This is only controversial if you’re trying to make controversial. Commentaries should engage the best available data, and if new data is available, older commentaries are by definition obsolete. It doesn’t make the old commentaries wrong, just incomplete. That’s why we keep getting new and updated commentaries.
English
1
0
4
177
Amos / Draw Near
Amos / Draw Near@DrawNear_·
Me in real life, distracted from my re-reading because all the Augustinians are crashing out online like they just discovered this exists.
Amos / Draw Near tweet media
English
34
12
239
6.8K
John D
John D@N704EK·
@5Solas2 Heiser was a total heretic. He said every commentary on Genesis before 2012 is obsolete and is interpreting scripture out of context.
English
0
0
0
88
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas2·
Michael Heiser justifying the elitist, pseudo-Gnostic hermeneutic he uses to reinterpret Scripture—a hermeneutic which apparently requires modern scholars to recover the Bible’s “real meaning” after the church somehow remained blind to it for nearly 2,000 years: “Seeing the Bible through the eyes of an ancient reader requires shedding the filters of our traditions and presumptions. They processed life in supernatural terms. Today’s Christian processes it through a mixture of creedal statements and modern rationalism.” “There’s no doubt that Psalm 82 can rock your biblical worldview. Once I saw what it was actually saying, I was convinced that I needed to look at the Bible through ancient eyes, not my traditions.”
English
69
3
45
20.1K
John D retweetledi
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas2·
@writeontheedg3 I don't care what liberal scholars say. Sorry.
English
5
1
7
817
Josh Barzon
Josh Barzon@JoshuaBarzon·
You get to pick one book to never have been written. Which one are you picking?
Josh Barzon tweet media
English
446
9
111
180.5K
Larry Sanger
Larry Sanger@lsanger·
Which of these, if any, do you think are true? (1) Michael Heiser believed in multiple gods. (2) Heiser believed in multiple elohim but not in multiple gods. (3) Belief in multiple gods is called polytheism. (4) Heiser (and those agreeing with him) are polytheists. (5) “Monotheism” should be redefined to include belief in multiple gods, as long as only one is supreme. (6) The traditional Christian view—that there is exactly one God and no other gods exist—is wrong about what the Old Testament teaches Be honest.
English
130
0
42
28.4K
John D
John D@N704EK·
@shane_chaffin @CriminalTube Bullets can ricochet off very soft dirt if the angle is low. I tested it and it was surprising how much energy some of the rounds still had.
English
0
0
0
111
Shane Chaffin
Shane Chaffin@shane_chaffin·
@CriminalTube Friendly advice, fire your warning shots into soft ground, if you can. (Soft earth doesn't ricochet.) Bullets eventually fall to the ground. When he shot up in the air in that wide arc, there was a chance he could have injured an innocent party far away.
English
23
0
49
28K
John D
John D@N704EK·
@HVNYrefugee Finally an easy one. The pic on the right is Washington.
English
1
0
2
287
David Scott Harris
David Scott Harris@HVNYrefugee·
One is southern Chile. The other is Washington State. Which is which?
David Scott Harris tweet mediaDavid Scott Harris tweet media
English
15
1
76
9K
John D retweetledi
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
Palestinianism is the inversion of history where failing at genocide gets treated as a tragedy. Think about how deranged that is. To spend 78 years claiming it was a “disaster” that they didn’t successfully commit genocide. It’d be like the Germans having a “Nakba” day.
English
66
641
4.1K
90.1K
John D
John D@N704EK·
@DrawNear_ It could have been an enjoyable book but all the gay propaganda and the pointless sexual stuff ruined it for me. Won't let my kids read it and won't read any other books by the author.
English
1
0
0
14
Amos / Draw Near
Amos / Draw Near@DrawNear_·
Here's my #1 pick for a book you probably haven't read but should. It's not a Christian book by a Christian author, but it is heavily aligned with the Christian moral worldview, realistically depicting love, sacrifice, mercy, faithfulness, authentic manliness, & devotion to God.
Amos / Draw Near tweet media
English
3
1
7
288
John D
John D@N704EK·
@hannahlape4life @sgruber91 Big Pro Life does not have the same goals as Christians. Christians want abortion to be counted for what it is in God's eyes - murder. Big Pro Life want women to have compete immunity for murdering their offspring. We are not the same.
English
0
0
4
39
Hannah Lape
Hannah Lape@hannahlape4life·
This is a slanderous misrepresentation of pro-life political strategy—you’re due for some repentance. We have the same goal and the same convictions. Human life begins from the moment of conception and abortion must end. Full stop. “The Pro-life Establishment” is working to pass state and federal legislation that will criminalize abortionists and abortion drugs distributors, and we’re fighting like hell against the abortion drug. Slander is easy. It gets you clicks. But you’re walking in sin and for some reason spending time and energy publicly tearing down and lazily misrepresenting fellow Christians and pro-lifers. If you have serious questions or concerns about one political strategy over another, good. Questions are welcome. But this public slander is getting old, and the enemy is using it to sow discord and division among those who share concern for unborn children.
English
15
0
7
2.1K
Seth Gruber
Seth Gruber@sgruber91·
Pro-Choicer: Women should have legal immunity to kill their unborn child at any point in pregnancy with zero legal consequences, but if she kills the baby after birth, she should be prosecuted. Pro-Life Establishment: Women should have legal immunity to kill their unborn child at any point in pregnancy with zero legal consequences, but if she kills the baby after birth, she should be prosecuted. Yes, it’s the same legal position. And yes, it should make you scratch your head.
English
17
28
202
13.5K