EDcomics

27 posts

EDcomics banner
EDcomics

EDcomics

@EDcomics

Katılım Haziran 2013
27 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@X @elonmusk @engineering @lindayaX When a parent post I replied to is deleted, my reply becomes orphaned with no notification. It would be helpful to get a heads-up so I know the context is gone.
English
0
0
0
12
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JFGariepy "He's a snitch" has been the position of @Black_Pilled Devon Stack. Are you suggesting he's a subversive element? Of what, how and to what extent? Could not every content creator in this sphere be subversive, yourself included? Paranoia is rampant. This, too, could be subversion.
English
2
0
10
1.9K
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
How to recognize a subversive, starter pack: "He appeals to desperate young men in their basement, I can understand." (Decoded: I have some softer talking points that will satisfy the demand for his content without being problematic to my Jewish donors.) "He's making it way too much about himself." (Decoded: I want his position, he must be weakened.) "He's a snitch." (Decoded: we intend to entrap young men into casually discussing assassinations so they can be put in jail, we wouldn't want a culture where people warn each other about these behaviors.) Yep, my friends, we are headed to the second half of the second Trump presidency and it's STILL all a big gayop.
English
16
51
428
8.7K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@ric_ox @JFGariepy As an enjoyer of soups, this looks quite appetizing. With different framing, a place setting and an herbal sprig on top for presentation, you'd have a completely different impression. JF simply left out the BS.
English
0
0
0
25
HealthRanger
HealthRanger@HealthRanger·
You are obfuscating moon landing deniers with Flat Earthers. Not the same thing. And this current mission isn't even landing on the moon, so your post actually makes zero rational sense. Showing a picture of Earth from space in no way means we landed men on the moon. It's not even remotely a "proof."
English
41
20
558
8.6K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@theodorebeers @JFGariepy "The word typically written and inserted into a golem's mouth is "emet," which means "truth" in Hebrew. This word is used to activate the golem, and it can be deactivated by removing the first letter, changing it to "met," meaning "dead."
English
0
0
2
94
Zachary Foster
Zachary Foster@_ZachFoster·
This is wild. The @WhiteHouse plagiarized its reason for launching a war on Iran from @FDD, a cutout of Israeli intelligence. Side-by-side screenshots in the 🧵
Zachary Foster tweet mediaZachary Foster tweet media
Stephen McIntyre@ClimateAudit

The most definitive White House statement purporting to justify the Israel-US war on Iran was its March 2, 2026 statement entitled "The Iranian Regime's Decades of Terrorism against American Citizens". whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/… After a brief editorial opening, the article lists 44 incidents with a total of 992 US deaths. The source of the data wasn't given. Where did it come from? Unlike the Iraq war or the Russia collusion allegation, the reporting didn't come from an intelligence assessment, flawed or otherwise. It turns out that the list was plagiarized by the White House from a June 19, 2025 list (fdd.org/analysis/2025/…) prepared by a former AIPAC employee (Tzvi Kahn) for a think tank (FDD) founded "to provide education to enhance Israel's image in North America". The think tank's original identity was "EMET (Hebrew for 'truth')". The June 19, 2025 publication was literally on the eve of the first US bombing of Iran on June 21, 2025. In this thread, I'll compare each and every item in the White House statement to the corresponding item in the original list by the former AIPAC employee. The list is virtually identical. Any slight changes are always in the change of ratcheting up the underlying allegation.

English
473
12.9K
30.6K
2.7M
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
That's not what the video shows, though. When he enters the other room, the skeleton reverts to a generic stance and slides instead of reproducing actual position and movement.
English
0
0
0
19
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
White People Food will be the most important cooking book of this century.
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬 tweet mediaJean-François Gariépy 🧬 tweet media
English
9
8
130
4.5K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JFGariepy What kind of salt did you sprinkle on top? Was it kosher salt?
English
2
0
0
96
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
I have spent the last few days perfecting a fluffy pretzel burger bun recipe for White People Food. I think I've reached something exceptional.
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬 tweet media
English
21
3
169
5.8K
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
💔The top 5 toxic behaviors that females do during a separation.💔 I think it's important we talk about those things because there are guys out there constantly being wrecked emotionally and there are very few guides that exist to sort all of this out, thus leading people to feel isolated; they falsely think their situation is unique. In my experience, Homo Sapiens Femalus Separatus is a mode of the human species that is widespread. You'll see these tactics happening in pretty much every separation in some form or another. 1. Betray-then-demand. The female will first commit an unforgivable act of betrayal - something like cheating, stealing, withholding or hiding the kids, renaming the kids - and then she will not only act like that betrayal deserves no reparation or apology, she will demand that you care about HER mental torment as she suffers from the mental distress resulting from HER own dishonest action. Optimal response: "Get fucked, bitch." Limit emotional care until she fixes her mistake. Adopt the perspective that she has created a situation of extortion; she has violated one of your rights and she is now demanding the continuation of your obligations towards her, dangling the possibility of the continuation of the violation of your rights in front of your face. There can be no continued obligations without respect of rights. There can be no love under extortion. Opening yourself to this kind of emotional blackmail will ruin your heart, because she will continue escalating the violations and demand more and more from you without giving back. A female on the loose must be repairing her mistake before you ever give a shit again. Be creative in the ways you tell her to go fuck herself in order to throw them off. 2. "I didn't mean it that way." The separating female will commit serious slights and violations of the rules of the couple while also trying to absolve herself of responsibility by claiming that, though she has committed the violation, she did not INTEND to commit the violation. "It's not what you think." "I hid the kids from you and lied to you but I really WANT you to be involved in the kids' life." "I didn't KNOW it would turn that way." "I planted that sword in your chest but I didn't WANT you to die." Optimal response: Impose a sense of moral judgment based purely in actions and not intentions. It doesn't matter if she doesn't know, doesn't think, doesn't intend, doesn't whatever she's claiming. All that matters is what she's DOING; if it acts like Femalus Separatus, then it most certainly is. This goes both for the direction of good and bad actions. Corrections are only valuable once accomplished, not the mere promise of them. 3. "If you cared more, perhaps I could undo my betrayal." Here, the separating female is trying to extort emotional care without committing herself to the path of reparation of the couple. She is so greedy she wants to drain some more care and attention while you, the cuckhold of this arrangement, get nothing. She wants love on the way out. But in my experience, a woman on the way out is not going to be swayed by love. All that makes them return is a pillar of complete, righteous, masculine rejection. Optimal response: "I do not provide emotional care or financial support under extortion." Do not let her get away with even the slightest immoral act toward you. Down the line, she will respect you more if she is ever to return. 4. The post-betrayal hypothetical. Homo Sapiens Femalus Separatus will engage in hypotheticals in which she irremediably violates your rights and then expect you to come up with a loving response toward them. It takes the form of "Suppose I was to [mess your life up significantly in some deeply immoral way], and this led us to split, would you commit not to go sleep with that girl I hate?" The fact that this tactic exists at all is a testament to the wicked sense of entitlement of females in general. As I've often written: they don't just want to wreck your life, they want to neuter you permanently. That's because females do not have the level of cognition required to understand that once they have broken the relationship, they have lost any control over their mate. Optimal response: "If you break our relationship, I can do whatever I want, including fuck a million girls you hate, and in fact I'll do it." 5. The post-betrayal justification. Here, the female tries to reconcile her cognitive dissonance over the fact that she has psychopathically executed a betrayal program against you, but she doesn't like to feel THAT evil. Therefore she will seek, in YOUR REACTION TO HER BETRAYAL, a justification for why she had to betray you. This generally takes the form of "Originally, when I [messed your life up significantly in some deeply immoral way], I didn't intend to break up with you, but now that I have seen how you reacted, I think it's better we part ways." Optimal response: Do not respond. Ignore. She is trying to insert poisonous thoughts of regret while constructing a narrative of innocence for herself. In the end, kindness will never help you fix a female that has decided she wants to separate from you. What the Optimal Responses above allow is 1. To protect yourself emotionally from the mental instability and wickedness of Femalus Separatus. 2. In the event that she was to come back, ensure that she will have gained respect for your upright stance in the process and that she will think twice before doing it again. In more general terms, understand that Femalus Separatus is a dangerous organism to even interact with at a distance. Never look at them in the eyes, never listen to a single word of what they say.
English
29
25
252
20.3K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JFGariepy Where do you get your elk? Is it farmed or hunted? I don't even know if elk is farmed, but I wouldn't be surprised.
English
1
0
0
72
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@NateDow14 @JFGariepy Tate is merely pointing out the reality of where society is at right now and where it is heading. The demographic and cultural change is irreversible. The best, and perhaps only, option is to escape and rebuild civilization elsewhere (and on a smaller, more manageable scale).
English
0
0
1
77
Nate Dow
Nate Dow@NateDow14·
@JFGariepy There’s a lot of comments on here arguing on the side of Tate. What they fail to understand is that modern hookup culture is not some natural evolution; it’sthe direct result of an external influence of our societies. A mental poison which must be dealt with if we are to survive.
English
3
1
20
1.9K
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
The Black man cannot help but to put a shine on polygamy, because that is what he is born from; that is all his genes are telling him is the right way. Ever heard of a Black family where the two parents are happily married, in the same home, with no trouble in sight whatsoever? The stats are clear, it basically does not exist. African societies are ones where the polygamous gynocracy won centuries ago, genetically normalizing the system and thus pushing men into a violent zero-sum game of trying to become alpha-gangsters. No point in shaming Andrew Tate for acting out his genetically-programmed preferences, but note that what happened to Africa since perhaps the dawn of the human species is what the left is trying to implement with the West; a regression toward polygamous status-pursuits that destroy any form of social stability and sense of private property (thus "equalizing" everyone). Is Tate's attack on Matt Walsh justified, claiming that Matt doesn't know women because he's only been with one? In another context, it might have been valid. If Matt was out there counseling guys on how to pick up one-night-stands at bars, then sure, he may lack wisdom on the subject. However, that is not the original point. The original point by Matt is about polygamy and its destructive effect on society. One does not develop a finer understanding of this subject by having sex with random make-up covered goblins picked up at a bar. Matt's point thus comes out on top. Civilization is threatened by the polygamous attitude of Black societies, though not in a way that we would expect a Black man like Andrew Tate to understand. Our attitude should be to let the Black man be while containing his violence and protecting our civilization and women from the influence of their uninformed discourse.
Andrew Tate@Cobratate

Matt doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He was a guy who found a girl and married her. He knows nothing about modern women. Nothing about modern dating dynamics. He knows nothing about women because we’ve slept with more than he’s ever spoken too in his life. He can’t imagine top tier male positioning. He’s not wrong because he’s evil, he’s simply wrong because he has no idea what he’s even discussing. This isn’t an insult. I’m not trying to insult Matt at all. But he thinks his extremely limited knowledge of women (one girl) somehow applies to the world. The fact he complains about polygamy and thinks it’s driven by men and not women alone proves he’s simply ignorant. He has no idea that polygamy is what women have chosen. But they won’t choose it for him. So he’s mad about it. When his wife takes him to divorce court and his entire world collapses he will apologise. Until then he wraps his world view in morality to avoid accepting the beta male positioning of acts of service. Acts of service to a female is the beta strategy across the entire animal kingdom while alphas are chased by females for their genetics alone with basically zero obligations. He doesn’t get it. He can’t get it. And if he accepts it he will hate himself. So once his wife bounces he can work it out.

English
62
80
957
61.1K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@iamagoose69 @Antunes1 It's not so much pushing the Overton Window, that is to push the discussion in one direction, as it is to desensitize people to shocking or taboo content... but I think the shock factor is the goal here, and desensitization is merely a consequence.
English
2
0
18
8.2K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JFGariepy I don't like it. The discussion has already been diverted into a universalist battle against cancel culture, and the racial component is set to be forgotten by those who most need to be aware of it.
English
0
0
0
69
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
The Shiloh case is an interesting splitting issue. You've seen a lot of people who have TALKED against cancel culture remain completely silent and unsupportive of her GSG. In one week, she has done more to eliminate cancel culture than these posers have in years of talking.
9mmSMG@9mmsmg

The Shiloh Hendrix fundraiser now sits at 700 thousand dollars. A lot of people are failing to understand why this happened. It was essentially a protest to show the mob that if they cancel someone over words, that person will profit from it massively. It was a protest against cancel culture.

English
11
16
227
11.4K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JFGariepy These look good. Very interested to hear about your dough recipe, preparation and how it turned out.
English
1
0
0
109
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@William5751776 @GiftsUngiven_ I hear the waiting list to adopt white children is very long, so hop on that ASAP. Congrats on the wife and kid, though. Wish you the best.
English
1
0
4
210
William
William@William5751776·
@GiftsUngiven_ I’ll probably adopt a few White kids because I want to help out. I have a kid with her already.
English
2
0
3
443
𝕲𝖎𝖋𝖙𝖘
𝕲𝖎𝖋𝖙𝖘@GiftsUngiven_·
Nearly all accusations of a White person being "racist" stem from assertions of collective confidence in our race. A primary reason White people have not yet regained power is that we have been collectively undermined and made unconfident by other races.
English
33
59
646
14.1K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JFGariepy JF, where did you get the original cut of meat? Would store-bought be safe or was this from a local farm or butcher?
English
1
0
0
72
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
It has now been 38 days that I've been updating my Twitter subscribers about this 38-days dry-aged 7 pounds striploin. I just cut a slice on the outside, cooking it slowly right now.
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬 tweet mediaJean-François Gariépy 🧬 tweet mediaJean-François Gariépy 🧬 tweet media
English
14
1
96
4.6K
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@JNTHED Is that blue roller the one that prints numbers? If so, what brand is it? I can't find one that does numbers.
English
0
0
0
364
EDcomics
EDcomics@EDcomics·
@KeithWoodsYT I'm glad you brought this up, Keith. For some reason, conservation has been deemed a liberal issue, but it should be the default position of conservatives. While absolute environmental stasis is impossible, maintaining equilibrium with the natural world should be among our goals.
English
0
0
0
27
Keith Woods
Keith Woods@KeithWoodsYT·
🦬🇪🇺 In recent years, a movement to "rewild" areas of Europe has taken off. In my latest essay, I reflect on the enormous loss of wildlife Ireland has suffered in recent history, and why rewilding is a project nationalists should embrace. keithwoods.pub/p/make-europe-…
English
77
139
1K
38.6K