Esteban

629 posts

Esteban banner
Esteban

Esteban

@EMacBytes

Working on the next commit

Zürich, Schweiz Katılım Eylül 2013
568 Takip Edilen92 Takipçiler
Mark Wolfe 🐺
Mark Wolfe 🐺@wolfeidau·
I did nothing to my $5 sideproject @PlanetScale DB and it dropped memory use all of a sudden, what is this sorcery?! Nice graph BTW 📉🤔 #sideproject
Mark Wolfe 🐺 tweet media
English
8
2
47
9.6K
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
@brunolemos You had the production database in your .env and expect it to magically know?
English
0
0
4
371
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Introducing... another usage limit reset for all our ChatGPT Work and Codex users. Should land over next 30 minutes. Hope you have an awesome weekend. Thank you for pushing our systems to the absolute limit, we have never seen traffic increase so quickly. Keep the feedback coming and we'll keep shipping.
Tibo@thsottiaux

Hello beautiful people! We have reset usage limits across Codex and ChatGPT Work. And another one will come later in the day. Rejoice. Now that I have your attention, a quick update on ChatGPT Work, Codex and all the updates we shared yesterday. We’ve spent the last 24 hours reading feedback, looking at usage patterns, and talking with many of you. The short version is that there is a *lot* of excitement for GPT 5.6 Sol, ChatGPT Work on mobile & web, but also that we didn't get everything quite right. - We made it too easy to use the highest-compute settings without making the impact on usage limits sufficiently clear. - We reorganized the desktop app in one bold move, making familiar things like chats and projects harder to find. - Our launch framing was focused on ChatGPT Work and to some of our Codex fans it made it feel like Codex was going away over time. Absolutely not our intention, we love Codex and it is here to stay. - And we introduced regressions for some existing multi-agent workflows, alongside a collection of rough edges in plugins and other parts of the experience. We’re landing a first set of improvements today. We’re resetting usage twice so people can keep experimenting, changing defaults and the model picker so they don’t push people toward unnecessarily expensive settings, fixing several plugin submission issues, improving how we represent Codex in the product, and cleaning up some of the most immediate desktop problems. A larger set of improvements will land next week. We’re bringing chats and projects back into the sidebar in a more familiar and customizable way, making usage and reset timing much more visible, clarifying when to use ChatGPT Work and when to use Codex, and addressing the many other smaller pieces of great feedback we've had. The ambition behind this launch hasn’t changed. We think bringing ChatGPT and Codex together into a workspace where people and agents can collaborate is a very important step forward. But an ambitious direction doesn’t excuse avoidable confusion or regressions in the first version. Please keep the feedback coming. We’re moving quickly, and you should see the experience already get better with a few updates today; and substantially better again next week.

English
1.2K
422
8.2K
1.2M
Andrea
Andrea@aesposito0·
@EMacBytes @BerntBornich no. too heavy, too hot, requires a lot of power. the objective functions for a robot hand vs a prosthetic hand are very different
English
1
0
6
1.1K
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
Nervermind… it stopped working 😂
English
0
0
0
6
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
Didn‘t that live translation demo feel off?
English
1
0
0
19
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
The rugpull by @primeuicom is obscene. Hope the community remembers this. To those affected: The fork is coming and will give you enough time to migrate away from that company. And also: There's never been a better time to migrate using AI.
English
0
0
0
12
Esteban retweetledi
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
We're extending access to Claude Fable 5 on all paid plans through July 12.
English
5.8K
9.1K
81.8K
22.5M
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
If Microsoft and Apple are making Docker obsolete, who's going to run Docker Hub? 🧐
English
0
0
0
12
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
@theo I‘ve had the opposite experience. Maybe worse than web, but still really good. But maybe it‘s because I separate design work (with Fable) and coding (with Fable).
English
0
0
0
17
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
Fable’s intuition for iOS development is significantly worse than other areas I’ve used it in. Great at infra, databases, web and more, just easily confused about how mobile apps work for some reason
English
132
23
1.7K
112.9K
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
@ThePrimeagen It‘s how they‘ll get profitable. They made it default. Next they deprecate 4.6. whoops! Margins just got much better.
English
0
0
1
24
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
Can someone explain to me what sonnet 5's purpose? Is this anthropic's apple car play?
English
330
23
2.1K
270K
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
Expect Anthropic and OAI to offer more low cost models once adoption of higher priced models starts slowing down (saturation). The way they can keep growing will be the segment they ignored: projects using the lower cost OSS models.
English
0
0
0
16
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
If it was just OpenAI, we‘d see prices spiral up much faster. Expect OSS to be an inhibitor for token prices and blur the lines for many choosing which model to take. It‘s not an obvious pick anymore.
English
1
0
0
20
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
We‘ve all seen the Sonnet benchmarks. The costs seem higher than even Opus. Well, that‘s the price correction! Anthropic is stopping the subsidies. Everyone‘s been talking about it, but now everyone seems surprised.
English
1
0
0
32
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
@cursor_ai But can you fix the x axis please😭
English
0
0
0
24
Cursor
Cursor@cursor_ai·
Claude Sonnet 5 is now available in Cursor. On CursorBench, it's a meaningful step up from Sonnet 4.6: 57% vs. 49%.
Cursor tweet media
English
206
211
4.2K
1.1M
Esteban
Esteban@EMacBytes·
@naveen @jeff_weinstein Wouldn‘t requiring 2FA and having a great UX around it solve the issue and make the experience better?
English
0
0
0
47
naveen.com
naveen.com@naveen·
@jeff_weinstein counterpoint does the average (perhaps older audience) use 2fa, let alone passkey? do they even have unique passwords per site, let alone the use of 1password? (haven’t looked at stats on this, but just asking out loud)
English
4
0
13
3.5K
Jeff Weinstein
Jeff Weinstein@jeff_weinstein·
is it just me.... sending a "magic link" to email more is more annoying than signing in with password (+ 2fa, ideally via passkey)?
English
238
22
2.1K
213.6K