Eastern Cardano Council

312 posts

Eastern Cardano Council banner
Eastern Cardano Council

Eastern Cardano Council

@EasternCardano

A diverse group of Cardano contributors from APAC region. Cardano ICC member. Pubkey: a12e0d6516828fd47afc70e2eccdfa11a4f4c76cb5eca55bdc9349865a70e4fe

Katılım Temmuz 2024
670 Takip Edilen646 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
Eastern Cardano Council statement to the Cardano Community A new Cardano Constitution has now been enacted on-chain. Our vote on the Governance Action that presented it to the Cardano Community: gov_action1jxne7hynfd7frcczwumd2eggps4kvy0msjztz9t0mutpy870ksgqqp6vps addressed how the Constitution was produced, not what has now been enacted. With the new Constitution now in force, we will take the time needed to carefully review and understand its implications before considering further governance actions. During this period, we will not vote on constitutional matters on behalf of the community. This pause is intentional and responsible. It ensures that any future decisions are made with clarity, accuracy, and respect for the Constitution as it now stands. We will update the community once this review is complete. ------------------------------------ *Eastern Cardano Council - ECC Statement on Cardano Forum forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card…
English
7
10
33
10.7K
🪏 Michele | Harmonic
🪏 Michele | Harmonic@MicheleHarmonic·
In the link below we directly address the @EasternCardano vote TL;DR We believe the ECC decision to be antithetical to the spirit of the Cardano constitution and largely misguided, resulting in double standards undermining the constitutional principle of equality
English
4
4
21
1.7K
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
The Eastern Cardano Council has concluded its review of Harmonic Labs’ response to our vote on their governance action. We carefully evaluated the points raised but found that the arguments presented are not consistent with our interpretation of the constitution. As such, our vote remains unchanged. We appreciate the Harmonic Labs team taking the time to respond to our rationale and for engaging in constructive, open, and transparent governance dialogue. Our full response is available on the Cardano Forum: forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card…
🪏 Michele | Harmonic@MicheleHarmonic

In the link below we directly address the @EasternCardano vote TL;DR We believe the ECC decision to be antithetical to the spirit of the Cardano constitution and largely misguided, resulting in double standards undermining the constitutional principle of equality

English
0
0
10
2K
Elder Millenial
Elder Millenial@ElderM·
@MicheleHarmonic @EasternCardano Id still like to know when they suddenly reversed their decision on the NCL. It seems they did so quietly because they have been voting yes on the constitutionality of some of the withdrawals.
English
1
0
1
141
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
@MicheleHarmonic Thank you for preparing this response to our vote Michele. We will review it and if it highlights any parts of your proposal we may have missed, we will re-evaluate our decision.
English
1
0
5
112
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
Following further review of the argument made in this post, the Eastern Cardano Council have agreed (7-0) that the 350 million ADA NCL Info action should be assessed based the constitution that was active when the governance action was submitted, which was the previous constitution. As the previous constitution did not permit the Constitutional Committee to veto Info governance actions based on constitutionality, and the NCL Info action was approved by DReps, we have therefore determined that the NCL is active and can be used when assessing treasury withdrawal governance actions. Note, this is a reversal of our previous position about whether the NCL is active, which was based on the current constitution. That decision was prior to the argument being made that we should be assessing the NCL Info action with the previous constitution.
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano

Important Follow-up on the NCL Status We have continued to deliberate the NCL status issue and in doing so have identified additional considerations that have created tension with our previous determination. Please review a further statement from us on this matter at forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card… This newly argued interpretation and the uncertainty it generates, further highlights the importance of properly funding governance resources, coordination infrastructure and process design.

English
1
0
11
907
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
@phil_uplc Thanks for your reply Phil 🙏 Could you please review our post regarding this👇as it addresses some of the points you raised? x.com/easterncardano…
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano

Following feedback from the community about our NCL Status announcement, we have provided more information regarding our rationale in a post on the Cardano Forum. forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card… We look forward to working with the community to develop more robust processes and frameworks, to help alleviate issues relating to the NCL and other governance matters in the future.

English
0
0
1
26
Phil 🪏
Phil 🪏@phil_uplc·
The constitution is extremely explicit, it says verbatim that the NCL must be agreed upon with a threshold of greater than 50% of active voting stake. There is absolutely zero mention of the words CC in relation to the NCL. Any attempt to consider it invalid is an explicit overreach of your authority, and a direct attempt to imbue the CC with authority that it isn't explicitly granted. Info actions cannot be considered unconstitutional because info actions cannot be enacted onchain. As per the constitution the role and scope of the CC is: > A CC shall be established as the branch of Cardano's on-chain governance process that ensures governance actions to be enacted on-chain are consistent with this Constitution. This scope, by definition, does not include any authority over info actions, because info actions do not get enacted on-chain. > Net Change Limit for the Cardano Treasury's balance per period of time must be agreed by the DReps via an on-chain governance action with a threshold of greater than 50% of the active voting stake The new constitution does not introduce any requirement for CC members to vote on the constitutionality of Info actions. Instead, it clearly that's that the CC is "limited to" voting on the constitutionality of governance actions. The wording is precise, it exists to limit the authority of the CC to vote solely with respect to constitutionality of proposals and no other bias, it does not state or indicate any requirement that the CC must vote on Info actions.
English
1
0
7
152
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
Net Change Limit Status The ECC team recently discussed the status of Cardano's Net Change Limit (NCL) and have determined that there is currently NO active NCL. This means that we will be required to find the treasury withdrawal governance actions currently on-chain as unconstitutional. The previously active NCL (gov_action169kllwhfmp488je5x5rwvufd08p8sztdcf0ghf5sp6ey2gnjdwaqql47xry) ended at the conclusion of epoch 612. While 2 governance actions were recently submitted to establish a new NCL, neither have met the criteria necessary to be considered ratified. While the Info action titled "Net Change Limit (Epoch 613 to Epoch 713)" (gov_action1m3xx08yv788vfxqh6nfvrjtvmqpwezsy0ggaczctkyjmttc2wmxsq4jsr7q) did meet the 50% DRep approval requirement, it did NOT meet the constitutionality assessment threshold by the Constitutional Committee. The latest NCL governance action titled "Net Change Limit of 300 Million ADA for Epochs 613–713" (gov_action1wwjwkg2g0qwr0mehey9r8gwn6qz3r28wl6wdl2s75kfmpy8j87tqqtft9tp) did NOT meet the 50% DRep approval requirement.
English
17
2
39
27.2K
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
Important Follow-up on the NCL Status We have continued to deliberate the NCL status issue and in doing so have identified additional considerations that have created tension with our previous determination. Please review a further statement from us on this matter at forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card… This newly argued interpretation and the uncertainty it generates, further highlights the importance of properly funding governance resources, coordination infrastructure and process design.
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano

Following feedback from the community about our NCL Status announcement, we have provided more information regarding our rationale in a post on the Cardano Forum. forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card… We look forward to working with the community to develop more robust processes and frameworks, to help alleviate issues relating to the NCL and other governance matters in the future.

English
3
6
15
1.7K
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
Following feedback from the community about our NCL Status announcement, we have provided more information regarding our rationale in a post on the Cardano Forum. forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card… We look forward to working with the community to develop more robust processes and frameworks, to help alleviate issues relating to the NCL and other governance matters in the future.
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano

Net Change Limit Status The ECC team recently discussed the status of Cardano's Net Change Limit (NCL) and have determined that there is currently NO active NCL. This means that we will be required to find the treasury withdrawal governance actions currently on-chain as unconstitutional. The previously active NCL (gov_action169kllwhfmp488je5x5rwvufd08p8sztdcf0ghf5sp6ey2gnjdwaqql47xry) ended at the conclusion of epoch 612. While 2 governance actions were recently submitted to establish a new NCL, neither have met the criteria necessary to be considered ratified. While the Info action titled "Net Change Limit (Epoch 613 to Epoch 713)" (gov_action1m3xx08yv788vfxqh6nfvrjtvmqpwezsy0ggaczctkyjmttc2wmxsq4jsr7q) did meet the 50% DRep approval requirement, it did NOT meet the constitutionality assessment threshold by the Constitutional Committee. The latest NCL governance action titled "Net Change Limit of 300 Million ADA for Epochs 613–713" (gov_action1wwjwkg2g0qwr0mehey9r8gwn6qz3r28wl6wdl2s75kfmpy8j87tqqtft9tp) did NOT meet the 50% DRep approval requirement.

English
4
4
13
1.9K
Thomas Upfield
Thomas Upfield@Tom_Voltaire·
I’m glad we have the @EasternCardano as a CC member. it’s difficult to base your decisions purely on the constitution when you know that you’ll be attacked for it.
English
1
2
10
457
Dr. Midnight Whale
Dr. Midnight Whale@Midnight_Whayle·
@EasternCardano @phil_uplc Thanks for clearly laying out your position, appreciate the transparency - I am going to grab a couple of beers and reread the constitution 🫡
English
1
0
7
263
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
Our interpretation of the new constitution is different to this. While what you say was the case in the previous constitution, the new one introduced a requirement for the CC to vote on the constitutionality of Info governance actions. It didn’t exclude NCLs as an Info governance, so we believe therefore that NCLs are included in that requirement.
English
1
1
10
420
Dr. Midnight Whale
Dr. Midnight Whale@Midnight_Whayle·
@EasternCardano @phil_uplc It might go something along the lines that you are ignoring the fact that the constitution explicitly requires only >50% active DRep stake for NCL ratification, not mandatory Constitutional Committee approval on info actions..
English
1
0
1
312
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
@mikerogero We will always abide by the decision of the CC, even if it is different to how we voted as one of seven. If this had sufficient “constitutional” votes to meet the required threshold, then we would consider it a valid NCL.
English
0
0
6
455
Mike Rogero 🌻
Mike Rogero 🌻@mikerogero·
@EasternCardano Your argument is that it didnt pass CC threshold because there aren’t enough votes prior to your vote, or because you don’t believe the proposal is constitutional on its merits? Holders of a deciding vote, can’t a-priori say it didnt pass with enough votes. The logic is inverted
English
2
0
6
547
Elder Millenial
Elder Millenial@ElderM·
I have a plan. Submit a TWA for 1 ada. Copy and paste the previously approved NCL of 350 million ADA. Why a TWA? The TWA becomes valid at an epoch boundary, where an info action must run for 6 epoch. If we submit it now and rally the entire ecosystem, we can get it approved within an epoch. I am happy to submit it, but I do not have the ADA for deposit. If someone else woukd submit, or if I had donors (I woukd return your ada after), I would happily submit this. The constitution only requires the NCL be a governance action, not an info action. A treasury withdrawal is a governance action, and thus the fastest way to approve a new NCL since a treasury withdrawal becomes valid as soon as it hits the threshold.
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano

Net Change Limit Status The ECC team recently discussed the status of Cardano's Net Change Limit (NCL) and have determined that there is currently NO active NCL. This means that we will be required to find the treasury withdrawal governance actions currently on-chain as unconstitutional. The previously active NCL (gov_action169kllwhfmp488je5x5rwvufd08p8sztdcf0ghf5sp6ey2gnjdwaqql47xry) ended at the conclusion of epoch 612. While 2 governance actions were recently submitted to establish a new NCL, neither have met the criteria necessary to be considered ratified. While the Info action titled "Net Change Limit (Epoch 613 to Epoch 713)" (gov_action1m3xx08yv788vfxqh6nfvrjtvmqpwezsy0ggaczctkyjmttc2wmxsq4jsr7q) did meet the 50% DRep approval requirement, it did NOT meet the constitutionality assessment threshold by the Constitutional Committee. The latest NCL governance action titled "Net Change Limit of 300 Million ADA for Epochs 613–713" (gov_action1wwjwkg2g0qwr0mehey9r8gwn6qz3r28wl6wdl2s75kfmpy8j87tqqtft9tp) did NOT meet the 50% DRep approval requirement.

English
4
2
19
1.7K
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
🗳 The Eastern Cardano Council (ECC) recently cast its on-chain votes on GA75 and GA76. Curious about the reasoning behind our decisions? We invite you to read our official rationales and explore the principles that guided our votes ⬇️ GA75 ➜ github.com/Eastern-Cardan… GA76 ➜ github.com/Eastern-Cardan… CC: @selfdrivenMark @phillewisit @yojoflo @Hahero7 @OscarW3st @andreassosilo @CardanoMiyatake #Cardano #Governance #Voltaire #ECC
Eastern Cardano Council tweet media
English
0
2
5
507
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
📣 Official Announcement from the Eastern Cardano Council The Eastern Cardano Council has issued a formal statement regarding the current validity status of the Constitutional Committee and the resulting temporary suspension of voting participation for Governance Actions submitted after November 26, 2025. We invite the community to review the full announcement for complete context and procedural clarity: 🔗 Full Statement: forum.cardano.org/t/eastern-card… The ECC remains committed to upholding transparency, constitutional integrity, and responsible governance across the Cardano ecosystem. CC: @selfdrivenMark @phillewisit @yojoflo @Hahero7 @OscarW3st @andreassosilo @CardanoMiyatake
English
1
6
12
569
Eastern Cardano Council
Eastern Cardano Council@EasternCardano·
🗳 Recently, the Eastern Cardano Council (ECC) voted "Constitutional" on GA74: "Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit" Want to know why? We invite you to read our rationale and understand the principles behind our decisions ⬇️ GA74 Rationale: github.com/Eastern-Cardan… CC: @selfdrivenMark @phillewisit @yojoflo @Hahero7 @OscarW3st @andreassosilo @CardanoMiyatake #Cardano #Governance #Voltaire #ECC #OnChainVoting
Eastern Cardano Council tweet media
Cardano Gov Actions@GovActions

📜 CC MEMBER VOTE ALERT! 📜 🗳️ The vote is: Constitutional 👥 Voted by: Eastern Cardano Council 🔗 Gov Action: adastat.net/governances/32… 🔗 The vote rationale: raw.githubusercontent.com/Eastern-Cardan… #Cardano #Blockchain #Governance

English
0
1
3
406