Jake

106.6K posts

Jake banner
Jake

Jake

@EconomPic

An optimist who assumes everyone is full of shit or lazy. Smart because he forgets. Fuck everyone against sensible gun reform. 👨‍👩‍👦‍👦👶🏻🐶🍔🍺🏀⚾️📊🤘

East Bay via NY via PSU via NJ Katılım Şubat 2009
585 Takip Edilen43K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
Short-term: trend > value > fundamentals Long-term: fundamentals > value > trend Investors need to be aligned with process AND time horizon
English
9
63
324
0
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@tyillc @DLSermersheim if you look at healthcare CPI as a whole, you get to what you want. there is no conspiracy here. just needs bucketing.
English
2
0
1
28
Richard Field
Richard Field@tyillc·
@DLSermersheim @EconomPic From an individual's perspective is inflation what happens to their health insurance premiums or what they actually incur in health care expenses?
English
1
0
0
18
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@tyillc Yes. That is the calculation within CPI as I described it in my tweet. The interpretation that this means the government is claiming health care insurance premiums are falling is false.
English
3
0
0
403
Richard Field
Richard Field@tyillc·
@AeonCoin @EconomPic I started down the path insurance premiums = what is paid for medical goods and services plus what insurers' earn ... sounded good ... then I looked at UnitedHealthcare ... what part of its income statement has been declining significantly for four years ...
English
1
0
0
25
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@tyillc These things all come together to inform total health care costs. My Only point is that saying the calculation implies insurance prices are declining is not correct.
English
1
0
0
34
Richard Field
Richard Field@tyillc·
@EconomPic For inflation, do we care about the amount spent on healthcare or the health insurance premiums paid ... I would think the latter because that is what individuals actually experience as inflation ...
English
2
0
0
43
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
Their tacos?
Jake tweet media
English
3
0
16
3.4K
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@AdviserCounsel Since 1978, penalties awarded during regular or extra time convert at a highly stable rate of roughly 79.1%. 40% likely too high, but a lot closer to reality than when people say they can beat up a bear.
English
1
0
1
336
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@AdamSinger seems like this would benefit everyone not living in Syracuse then
English
0
0
0
76
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@AdamSinger Agree… so they shouldn’t be jamming them in areas where people explicitly don’t want them and are voting against them (which they are doing in too many instances)
English
1
0
1
97
Adam Singer
Adam Singer@AdamSinger·
@EconomPic I sat and watched projects punted forever with "environmental impact reports" when I lived in CA, the process was used as a weapon against progress -I do agree though zoning should handle all this, and most places I've lived had that established already pretty well
English
1
0
0
79
Adam Singer
Adam Singer@AdamSinger·
It's hard to imagine any sort of future we don't all benefit from more compute and more energy. Just incredibly regressive any state would stand in the way of increasing capacity of both. We need way more people in gov who are actually ambitious and optimistic about tomorrow
English
12
5
55
3.2K
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@AdamSinger so a state that says "let's take a pause while we revisit zoning and impact of data centers on the localities in which they are built" seems logical as long as it doesn't interfere with long term progress
English
1
0
1
346
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
companies / local governments just need to work with local constituents... agree that both should be good for society as a whole, but there is a (IMO) likely path where data centers won't be good (and likely bad... potentially very bad) for the communities in which they are being built
English
2
0
1
536
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@LizSimmie yeah... prop 13 in CA is a whole different issue
English
1
0
0
61
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@tyillc you didn't read my tweet. they aren't hard to track and this isn't the change in what people pay for insurance. it is what people use on healthcare relative to what they pay.
English
2
0
1
90
Richard Field
Richard Field@tyillc·
@EconomPic If health insurance premiums are so difficult to track, why can Google show ACA premiums up 20-26% year over year and employer plan premiums up 6-9%?
English
1
0
2
358
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@EricBalchunas @philbak1 HUGE flows into gold (and other metals) in 2025 and beginning of 2026, so this is a reversal of that trade.
Jake tweet media
English
0
0
3
241
Eric Balchunas
Eric Balchunas@EricBalchunas·
@philbak1 Gold is tough. Zero corr. Does whatever the hell it wants. But that’s a lot of outflows quickly. Can’t really sugarcoat it.
English
2
1
6
981
Eric Balchunas
Eric Balchunas@EricBalchunas·
AFTER THE GOLD RUSH: $GLD has seen nearly $15b in outflows since March 1st.. that's actually 50% more in outflows than all of the bitcoin ETFs have seen in aggregate since the October peak.
Eric Balchunas tweet media
English
20
17
165
29.5K
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@ConvexityCowboy something along the latter is what i was thinking
English
0
0
1
101
Convexity Cowboy
Convexity Cowboy@ConvexityCowboy·
@EconomPic Switcheroo on the collateral seems like it would be defrauding the MBS pool that bought the mortgage? Or do you create some govt fund that prepays the old mortgage below par and issues a new one at the old coupon?
English
1
0
1
127
Jake
Jake@EconomPic·
@Confortorosario makes sense if you have the cash. can't get the mortgage rate in an after tax return without taking on material risk.
English
0
0
0
61
Will
Will@Confortorosario·
@EconomPic We are downsizing. Our realtor says every transaction in our price point is cash.
English
1
0
1
68
Ben
Ben@Financialtailor·
@EconomPic How about, unless you have dependents, if you have a single family home that exceeds a certain square footage you pay a gigantic tax?
English
2
0
2
181
Less than well capitalized
@EconomPic @kylascan But that doesn't change supply, just market liquidity right? That only makes homes marginally more affordable. And are we assuming the large expensive boomer homes crash in value and become affordable? They will still be too expensive
English
1
0
0
67