Eric Summann

7.7K posts

Eric Summann banner
Eric Summann

Eric Summann

@EricSummann

Liberal. 3 more skills until I’m maxed.

Katılım Şubat 2012
736 Takip Edilen263 Takipçiler
yeet
yeet@Awk20000·
Asmongold clashes with Andy Cortez after Cortez called him and his fans out for coming into his YouTube chat bc of Mixtape
yeet tweet media
English
86
2
352
30.5K
Shirley_Not 🇦🇺
Shirley_Not 🇦🇺@Shirley_Notsrs·
@CuervoDelFuego @Awk20000 Yes, but these people don't watch him and probably didn't know. They still think his room is messy even though he cleaned it, so I was bringing up talking points they still parrot lol
English
1
0
1
82
Luis J. Gomez
Luis J. Gomez@luisjgomez·
It is not ok to assault someone over words. It is not ok to shoot someone for punching you. Both can be true.
English
2.6K
97
2.1K
679.1K
Eric Summann
Eric Summann@EricSummann·
@kaitybella A real spaghetti taco uses a slice of white bread slathered in butter
English
0
0
0
126
Luis J. Gomez
Luis J. Gomez@luisjgomez·
Dave Smith and I rented the National Lampoon‘s DVD with the amazing racist years before we knew Ari. We were like 20 year old roommates. when we finally met him we were so excited
baloney_and_cheese@Baloney_and

@luisjgomez See Ari's skit for the first time as a kid not realizing who the F he was cant be topped. Its up there with top moments of my life.

English
14
2
148
24K
Steve French
Steve French@lumpylemon·
@EricSummann @UT_Liberty @luisjgomez Point is, people can never legally assault you. It doesn't matter if it's over a simple word or over you sitting on a bus. What you said was just wrong. Keep being mad about it. They CAN'T. Doesn't matter if they will. They CAN'T. They are not allowed to. They are no supposed to.
English
1
0
1
20
Luis J. Gomez
Luis J. Gomez@luisjgomez·
I don’t always stand on one side of the line. Each situation has its own nuance. I defended Zimmerman after hearing the facts. This girl was both justified and hilarious in the moment. Chud is a shit head. If you always agree with one side you don’t have any thoughts of your own.
Head of Nap@head_nap187

@gasdigital @RealAssOfficial @luisjgomez @ZASpookshow Weird to have here one & then spiral out for days online after justifying that she should have been violently jumped over a word after she was perfectly polite & cordial with you.

English
20
0
40
7K
Steve French
Steve French@lumpylemon·
@EricSummann @UT_Liberty @luisjgomez That's like saying you can sit on a bus but aren't free from the consequence of being stabbed in the neck for it. It's not an acceptable consequence just because someone eventually will stab you in the neck. They aren't allowed to. They aren't supposed to. It's meaningless.
English
1
0
0
17
Eric Summann
Eric Summann@EricSummann·
@UT_Liberty @lumpylemon @luisjgomez No one is saying that someone “can legally” assault you for it. we are saying that someone “will” eventually assault you for it. We are also saying you can’t just go blasting in all situations and claim self defense.
English
1
0
0
22
Status
Status@UT_Liberty·
That’s circular reasoning, stupid liberal. Let’s break it down like you’re 12. Can you just assault me for existing? The answer is no. I have the right to exist. I would be validated in using reasonable force if you attempt to impede on that right. Pretty straight forward no? Freedom of speech is a right. You can’t just assault me for calling you a slur.
English
1
0
0
9
Status
Status@UT_Liberty·
@lumpylemon @EricSummann If he doesn’t understand at this point I don’t think he ever will. “Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequence.” Yea and the consequence of you trying to punch me over a slur is you get shot.
English
1
0
0
22
Steve French
Steve French@lumpylemon·
@EricSummann @UT_Liberty "Civilians" CAN'T punch you over your words. What do you not get about that? You are literally wrong. If the law allowed "civilians", or anyone for that matter, to legally hit you because of your words, that would be a violation of your first amendment rights.
English
1
0
1
25