


Nick Stone
87.8K posts

@EuropeanNick
Lots of politics, plenty of travel, public transport geek & delving into the Eurovision Song Contest. My views are my own. Retweets not always endorsements.







I used to respect you Rupert. Restore have never wanted anything to do with this area. But now someone born with a silver spoon in their mouth is trying to lie about the only working class local man in the race. I want net negative immigration.


Since the debate on Britain rejoining the EU has opened up two questions have emerged as central. Would the UK be forced to join the Euro or the passport-free Schengen Area? The truth I explain for @arguablymag, is that if you look closely at the treaties, the UK would have a veto of any implementation of its Schengen membership, as would Ireland who is not in Schengen — which is of course like us committed to an open border on the island of Ireland as per the Good Friday Agreement. The UK also would join the Union with an automatic derogation on Euro membership until it had fulfilled the Maastricht criteria, key bits of which are at their own discretion. If the EU wanted a Rejoin government to win the referendum, it could simply clarify these points before any campaign. Neither of which is a concession but a statement of legal fact. This means a referendum, per polling, is eminently winnable. arguably.uk/p/a-good-rejoi…

NEW: The myths of Makerfield – this pivotal seat is not what you might think – I sit down with Robert Kenyon, Reform's candidate, who defends himself as "rough around the edges" – Focus group, poll and conversations on the ground suggest seat on a knife-edge – Restore Britain on 7 per cent – should Reform be concerned? thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

Robert’s answer is not Reform policy. As the person responsible for our deportation plan I want ensure people know where we stand: If a foreign national lives in social housing at taxpayer expense, they automatically fail our economic test and will be deported.






I’ve decided that Burnham will trounce Reform and become our next PM. It’s over. The only possible silver lining is that he’ll probably be ‘coronated’ after a decisive win and won’t have to subject himself further to the demands of the Labour membership.




How is this argument any different from the argument that Conservatives made against Reform in 2024?

