Existing In Limbo

@FindTheNexus @NatlyDenise_ If I was a globalist combating Christian resistance I'd infiltrate and amplify the largest religious sect that has one infallible earthly leader. I'd find a way to take over the largest political org. for college aged Christians and lead them towards the acceptable religion.

They’ve infiltrated the Catholic Church and are using it as a credential to further a political agenda. Simultaneously, Christian apologist networks and faith-based orgs are watering down the gospel message and encouraging believers to yield endlessly to other cultures without bringing them to faith. This is a multi-frontal assault on the church; no denomination is spared. Catholicism is the larger institution, so it makes sense they chose it to gain members. The discernment of a believer would never allow them to follow this heretical teaching. This is a big problem.

Candace: “[Charlie] You’re too smart to be a Protestant.” C for C Audience: Laughter. Woots. Cheers. Imagine clapping at spiritual arrogance at the expense of Charlie’s corpse being ventriloquized. Speech: No Christian testimony detected 🔍

JUST IN: James Comey has been SUBPOENAED over his involvement in the Trump/Russia Collusion HOAX.

@treehoe08041730 @TheMilkBarTV Here it is in her own words. I hadn't caught that, thanks for pointing it out. It's absolutely wild. x.com/i/status/19956…

@TheMilkBarTV Is this who she texted about the assasination on her life instead of filing an actual report “someone very high up”?

🚨Was Joe Kent Candace Owens’ mole in the US government, feeding her information about the Charlie Kirk investigation? On October 1, 2025, Candace Owens said she was “very aware of what’s going on” and claimed that “about 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie Kirk informed people at Turning Point, Jewish donors, as well as a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause.” She was directly quoting a message Charlie Kirk had sent in a group chat before his death - a message Candace revealed on her show a week later. TPUSA spokesperson @AndrewKolvet revealed the next day, on October 8, that he was in the group chat and had taken that screenshot, and that, “to leave no stone unturned,” he had passed it on to “people in government” for the sake of the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death, saying, “I don’t know where it went from there, apparently.” Pointing to the fact that it landed in Candace Owens' lap. The New York Times reported on October 28 that Joe Kent, while still serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, had: “examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power, or another entity, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.” Which, according to the Times article: “alarmed Kash Patel, the director of the FBI. Mr. Patel and other senior officials believed Mr. Kent was overstepping, treading on FBI responsibilities, and potentially interfering with the investigation and the prosecution of the suspect, Tyler Robinson.” After resigning from his role as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show today. Speaking about the Charlie Kirk investigation, he said, “there’s still linkage for us to investigate,” and pointed directly to the group chat text messages that Andrew Kolvet had handed over to the US government - and that Candace Owens had used on her show - as evidence of that. It was also reported today that Joe Kent is under investigation by the FBI for allegedly leaking classified information while serving as director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center. Considering that Candace Owens had access to a private message tied to the Charlie Kirk investigation - a message that was passed to government officials - and that Joe Kent was, at the same time, reviewing sensitive case material, is now reportedly under investigation for leaks, and has himself pointed to that same message as evidence of a broader conspiracy, The overlap is enough to raise a legitimate question about whether he could have been Candace Owens' source. I reached out to Joe Kent for comment, but he did not respond.

@TheMilkBarTV So she's been spewing literal fed slop? 😆

@ExistingInLimbo @AllyJKiss Carrie Prejean Boller is the Bud Light / Dylan Mulvaney of Catholics.

@AllyJKiss Regardless of how I feel about these people, getting recently converted Catholics to speak for Catholics is eerily similar to that time Caitlyn Jenner was named woman of the year.

There’s like 5 people there 🤣

Help me understand what I’m missing. Bravery for what, exactly? Asking Seth Dillon “gotcha” questions at a religious liberty hearing … based on a manufactured, unproven Candace Owens story about Charlie Kirk allegedly being pressured in the Hamptons? Cool. So … who was she brave against? Names. Events. Specific moments. What did she risk? What did she actually confront? And if you’re gonna say “speaking out against Zionists” … fine. But be specific because that’s just a slogan. If there’s real bravery here, it shouldn’t be this hard to point to it. Agains … BE SPECIFIC. Names, place, time, etc.

@RepThomasMassie @CarriePrejean1 I Don't believe you. Do you have a lapel pin showing your support?

I support Carrie Prejean Boller 💯! She stopped by my office today with her husband, and I gave her one of the debt badges that I invented to show my appreciation for her bravery with respect to the White House Religious Freedom Commission. I’m inspired by her resolve.

@SLancasterX You can't claim to care more than his wife because she doesn't cry enough when you haven't cried at all.

Candace Owens VS Facts Me | LIVE Debate? The question is, will she stand behind her invitation? #candaceowens #debate #livedebate #charliekirk

If your “evidence” sounds like: “She didn’t mention me in her love story” “She said the right things and he liked her” ...You’re not exposing a crime. You’re exposing yourself.

@NJBeisner They met at a TPUSA opening in August. He started messaging her right after, she didn't message him back. They weren't total strangers at the interview. Candace met him at a political conference held at The Breakers in Palm Beach, Florida and was hired on the spot.

“It is arranged by Tyler Bowyer to meet Charlie—this time one-on-one for a job interview. And in retrospect this really bothers me because that’s not how job interviews happened at Turning Point USA. You were not taken to meet the CEO of the company at a restaurant.” I hate point out the obvious, but Charlie was willingly part of this. Candace makes it sound all suspicious, and we know she thinks Charlie was a moron with handlers and no ability to judge people, but he willingly met Erika under the guise of interviewing her for a position. So there’s nothing suspicious. The way Erika and Charlie tell the story, Tyler just wanted Charlie to meet Erika with the potential of her coming to work for them. Maybe he secretly wanted to set them up. Either way, all parties consented, so it wasn’t suspicious, and it wasn’t an official interview at the restaurant, but Charlie ended up being taken with her and told her he couldn’t hire her because he wanted to date her.

AWESOME

Catholic Carrie Prejean Boller is a Catholic who is Catholic. Did you know this Catholic was Catholic? Catholic Prejean is so Catholic she doesn’t tell any Catholic she’s Catholic. It’s been ten minutes that she’s been Catholic. And not Catholic, but Catholic Catholic.

@Jordan_S90 To be fair, I could hear her contempt from the very beginning. The niceties were disingenuous, but necessary at the beginning to capture Charlie's audience for the bait and switch. She was telling the truth and hated the taste of it, now she revels in the story she's built up.

@ExistingInLimbo The funny part is whenever she gets it completely wrong like this or contradicts herself she always claims it was because she was just an oh so good person who was trying to give everyone else the benefit of the doubt at the time.

Is nothing sacred to Candace Owens? Here she is, trying to trash Charlie Kirk and Erika Kirk’s marriage—saying it was all a sham and fake happiness. She says she didn't want to say all this when it was first going down but now the she sees how much Erika lies she can't hold it in any longer. Who are you to say? Do you have any proof of this? Or is your proof the same type you have for showing that Erika conspired to murder her husband and the father of her children? That is to say: no proof at all. Even if you did have proof, you should never say something like this. Unless you’re a completely trash human being, you should never speak about someone like this—especially someone you call a friend. To opine about the happiness (or lack thereof) after one of them has died is just disgusting and so off-limits I can’t even describe it. This is the woman these cultists look up to as their moral superior? This is the woman they say we’re evil for calling demonic? This is the woman they claim is even remotely Christian? Give me a break. And all of y’all are going to be condemned for going down this road with this devil.

How was your day? 😑

I don’t even smoke lol 💨

I am a Nuclear Engineer. I will be more than happy to challenge @joekent16jan19 about Iran's nuclear capabilities. I know he won't accept, nor will @TuckerCarlson. So anyone who thinks this same position! (Aka, yes Iran was absolutely aiming for a nuclear weapon)