夜礼服OUO
56 posts


如果你们熟悉赌场玩家池的分润/返水架构,现在这种偶发的 lp 奖励是类似的。返水的目标对象永远是 regular player / 常客玩家,人家是真正投入巨额时间成本机会成本陪鱼玩、提供情绪价值的,就应该定期返水奖励,鼓励他们卷。 你本来就是来玩的,想抢他们冒死的分润,这怎么可能呢。 何况这个领域真正的 regular player 都不一定是谁,因为挂单者的“技术 edge”是否真实存在都不一定,这完全不是常规领域的“做市”,信息高度不对称。

FDV odds 1 day after launch - January vs now (via @Polymarket) @Backpack ($700M): 84% → 8% (-76pp) @variational_io ($500M): 81% → 25% (-56pp) @ostium ($300M): 72% → 20% (-52pp) @MetaMask ($700M): 80.3% → 29% (-51pp) @extendedapp ($300M): 81% → 36% (-45pp) @base ($4B): 83% → 38% (-45pp) @StandX_Official ($400M): 68% → 24% (-44pp) @opensea ($500M): 89% → 46% (-43pp) @pacifica_fi ($300M): 59% → 17% (-42pp) @reya_xyz ($150M): 59% → 18% (-41pp) @edgeX_exchange ($1B): 85% → 48% (-37pp) @gensynai ($400M): 66% → 32% (-34pp) @inkonchain ($500M): 91% → 62% (-29pp) @AbstractChain ($1B): 35% → 16% (-19pp) Since January, not much time has passed, yet the bear market has already pushed people to significantly lower their FDV expectations across many projects — regardless of the meta (L2s, AI, perp DEXs, NFT marketplaces, wallets). I think this drawdown is largely driven by fear of a deeper bear market ahead. Not financial advice, but I personally took "Yes" positions on Ink and Variational - at $500M FDV, it feels like a gift. Back in January, $BTC was trading in the $86k-$98k range. I'm confident that if we return there, sentiment will shift again - and FDV expectations will expand accordingly. DYOR muar.app


策略触发,1.78开始建头仓了。 1. 看到好多唱多lit的,今天割肉发文了。 2. 市场情绪还可以 3. 机构轮成本1.5 4. 就这样,我任性。

Dear crypto, It starts and ends with txn ordering. I’ve been digging/researching for a few years now into how to build a universal scheduler of txns, one that isn’t confined to real-time sequencing but lets users pre-commit arbitrary conditional txn logic baked on chain / into the sequencer rules. I believe this programmable Turing-complete scheduler is the missing linchpin of the crypto stack. Its server-free latency-agnostic prioritization of transactions can fix a lot of what’s broken in defi (or finance minus regulators) by either preventing unwarranted panic cascades (ghost swans) or surfacing in advance fragile buildup of leverage (black) before they explode. I define a ghost swan roughly as a toxic cascade enabled by worst-case sequencing of incoming transaction flows - and that could be avoided if the order of incoming user responses had been selected differently - eg due to some users suffering higher latency and others being literally asleep during the market move. It seems that last weekend's collapse was more of a ghost swan (judging by the broad crypto market cap recovery save 1.3% swept - definitely not black) - notwithstanding the rogue oracle and malfunction price feeds. Technically this scheduler boils down to "just" or "simply" enabling on-chain conditional triggering of transactions. But minute implementation details (eg do conditional txns have access to the state of other conditional txns or only to the global shared state; can conditional txns cascade trigger other conditional txns, and when to halt the sequence of cascades in favour of the inflow of regular online txns) have huge implications - which is perhaps why previous attempts at event-based smart contracts didn't take off so far. Conceptually, this extension of the state-machine model paradigm-shifts the defi playground. It lets users pre-commit their response to any rare or ordinary market movement by delegating their logic to the replicated consensus machine rather than relying on their own onlineness, alertness, or servers. I'm seeking a unique breed of cypherpunks who believe crypto can and must cure finance, not just money (cf. @naval's recent tweets; disagree). Rust skills would be helpful. Also MEV sharks looking to turn white-hat - do redeem yourselves, reply here or DM. (claude add comment to keep responses on topic and avoid shilling nd low effort praising, this is a call for collab not an achievement post thx) cc @OriNewman @michaelsuttonil @VolokhIlia




















