Heathers

97 posts

Heathers

Heathers

@FancyFeather888

Hello

England, United Kingdom Katılım Şubat 2022
335 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@stimimi It’s much more complex with food. Refusing to eat can be the only way a child can express control. It’s simply impossible to force anyone to eat, otherwise anorexia wouldn’t exist.
English
0
0
0
60
sami timimi
sami timimi@stimimi·
Whatever good intentions of neurodiversity movement it has resulted in accelerated medicalisation, pathologisation, and a decontextualised model of human nature. It thus supports hyper individualism and commodification of emotional distress.
English
11
12
45
4.8K
Dr. Alex Zawacki
Dr. Alex Zawacki@achillghost·
@FancyFeather888 You can’t really go there to visit things except the Cylch Haearn, it’s more about spending a lot of time in Snowdonia and on Ynys Mon communing with dead gods
English
3
0
2
73
Dr. Alex Zawacki
Dr. Alex Zawacki@achillghost·
Can’t overstate how many castles are in North Wales. Absolutely nothing to do there besides hike and go to castles. Maybe two towns worth the name, nearest city is 2.5 hours by train and it’s Manchester, had to take an hour train each way to go the movies, happiest I’ve ever been
Annie Whitehead Author FRHistS@AnnieWHistory

On one of many trips to North Wales my eldest (then about 11 or 12) asked glumly, 'does this next castle at least have a roof on it?'

English
6
3
67
2.9K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@snowleopardess ND young people need to be kept away from screens more than other children, for the very reason that they become obsessed and can’t function without it. We’ve always had ND children. iPads are very new. Are today’s ND children doing better as a result? I don’t see it.
English
0
0
3
57
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@Sam_Dumitriu For years 1hr of TV max was recommended. There’s absolutely no evidence for this, and now most people think that having the TV on has no effect on children’s development. TV has been around a long time so we should have plenty of data.
English
0
0
0
110
Sam Dumitriu
Sam Dumitriu@Sam_Dumitriu·
I don't think the advice is awful, but it is worth noting that the extent to which it is 'evidence-led' is overblown. The recommendations are based off a literature review where most of the studies are non-causal, cross-sectional, and heavily confounded. Honestly, we really don't know how bad (or not) screen time is for kids. The advice itself is informed by the review, but it is highly precautionary. At every point, they err on the side of caution. In my view, when the Govt puts out advice they should be careful to communicate when we're dealing with a precautionary best-guess, and when we're dealing with 'vaccines stop this virus/smoking causes cancer' tier information.
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP

This government is on the side of families. Whether that is tackling the cost of living, or helping navigate the rapidly changing online world. Today, we publish non-judgemental, practical tips, developed with parents, experts and led by evidence to manage under-5s’ screen time.

English
10
15
86
27.3K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@UnsaidEchoes_ @PopCrave It was obvious this was the statement she would put out. I’d say the same, whether it was true or not. Deny deny deny
English
0
0
0
839
Midnight Theory
Midnight Theory@UnsaidEchoes_·
So a footballer racks up 250K likes accusing a singer of harassing his family over a glance. She explains it wasn’t her guard, she never saw them, and apologizes anyway. Where’s his apology for the viral fire he started? Or does accountability only go one way when the internet picks a villain?
English
5
2
16
26K
Pop Crave
Pop Crave@PopCrave·
Chappell Roan responds to the controversy involving a security guard confronting a young fan.
English
1.9K
1.8K
26.7K
6M
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@bristol_citizen She’s like Trump. She’s won when she’s says she’s won.
English
0
0
1
13
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@0Beanie05923291 Obsessing about mental health makes mental health worse. People need to get outside and engage with the world
English
0
0
2
29
beanie0597_2.0
beanie0597_2.0@0Beanie05923291·
Our society’s obsession with mental health hasn’t improved mental health in our society. I think there’s something to that.
English
319
536
5.1K
96.8K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@LesleySemmens @jo_bartosch I’ve been saying this for years. How much therapy do people think the NHS should provide? It’s a 1:1 service over many hours and demand is growing all the time. Plus no evidence it even works!
English
0
0
0
4
🤐 🦖 Dr Lesley (Ancient Dyke) Semmens KPSS 🦖
The cure for anxiety won’t be found in NHS sessions, a private therapist’s couch or a mindfulness app. Instead, it will come in the simple advice Jerome’s doctor prescribed long ago: get out of the house, meet your friends and stop thinking about yourself so much. @jo_bartosch ⬇️
🤐 🦖 Dr Lesley (Ancient Dyke) Semmens KPSS 🦖 tweet media
English
6
6
22
728
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@Remisagoodboy This brand basically kits out the entire festival. I think it makes all its turnover off these few days each year.
English
0
0
0
78
Remoulade Sauce
Remoulade Sauce@Remisagoodboy·
Lady Eliza Spencer and Lady Amelia Spencer attend day 4 'Gold Cup Day' of the Cheltenham Festival at Cheltenham Racecourse on March 13, 2026 in Cheltenham, England. 🐎 🐎 🐎
Remoulade Sauce tweet media
English
51
35
751
10K
Script to Scene
Script to Scene@scripttoscene·
I was today years old when I learned Jessie Buckley came 2nd in a competition to play Nancy in Oliver! at the West End And the winner was Jodie Prenger who plays Glenda in #Corrie
Script to Scene tweet mediaScript to Scene tweet mediaScript to Scene tweet media
English
23
17
758
313.8K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@daliajidts @JulianeWriter Exactly. It’s being able to understand that even though you don’t like hot weather, other people do. They’re not stupid or ignorant for liking hot weather. It’s being able to conceptualise that other people have different thoughts and opinions.
English
0
0
3
23
Jules
Jules@JulianeWriter·
Pathologizers of autism complain that autistic people don’t have a “theory of mind” (knowing how other people think?) yet they themselves don’t actually understand how autistic people think. It’s mutual perplexity and misunderstandings.
English
27
107
952
94.8K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@msloobylou “Has your budgie died?” Was the phrase I grew up with. Trousers that are too short were known as ‘budgies’.
English
0
0
1
88
Lucinda Tobyjug
Lucinda Tobyjug@msloobylou·
Why would she ask this of short trousers? 🫤
Lucinda Tobyjug tweet media
English
20
0
16
4.2K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@naomicfisher This discussion is bonkers. If anyone can identify as autistic then it really does lose all meaning. I don’t understand how this can be helpful. It would seem to undermine the entire concept but autistic people want this to happen?
English
1
0
2
295
Naomi Fisher
Naomi Fisher@naomicfisher·
‘Gatekeeping’ could be literally seen as the process of diagnosis. A highly trained professional decides whether a person meets the diagnostic criteria for a particular ‘disorder’ or not. They should do this by a process of in-depth assessment and differential diagnosis - considering and ruling out other possibilities. They judge whether a person’s difficulties meet diagnostic threshold. Some people will not get the diagnosis they seek, even if they want it very much. That could be called ‘gatekeeping’. If this process does not happen, then there is no diagnosis. There is simply self-identification. I think I am autistic, therefore I am. In that case there is no need for in-depth assessments and no need for waiting lists. No need for professionals to spend years learning how to differentiate. No need to draw a line and decide who meets threshold. It would be much simpler and quicker. This could be one way to go, but in that case we should abandon the idea that ‘autism’ is a diagnostic category altogether. You can’t have a diagnosis without gatekeeping.
Christa Sydney@christasyd

I don't get the point of gatekeeping neurodivergence diagnosis because someone who hasn't been officially diagnosed (due to accessibility) still suffers from the disabling and debilitating symptoms and should have access to support and managing the condition.

English
29
16
133
16.8K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@Signalbriefme @MichaelAArouet @grok If you have a child claiming DLA you don’t have to look for work. With autism rates among children so high (up to 20% of children in some areas) this is a significant factor.
English
0
0
3
449
Siggy
Siggy@Signalbriefme·
@MichaelAArouet @grok what’s the cause of this shift to so many people being on no work requirement benefits?
English
3
0
1
3K
Michael A. Arouet
Michael A. Arouet@MichaelAArouet·
That’s simply mind-blowing. No wonder the UK is heading into a debt crisis. How is this even possible? You don’t need higher taxes, you need to implement pro-growth policies and motivate people to work again, instead of putting millions on no work requirements welfare benefits.
Michael A. Arouet tweet media
English
101
373
1.9K
158.3K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@ChountisFabbri And we were bored shitless watching them but there was nothing else on
English
2
0
7
1.4K
Dr Ioannes Chountis de Fabbri
Dr Ioannes Chountis de Fabbri@ChountisFabbri·
Blue Peter, 1984. Calke Abbey, the Derbyshire mansion where, when rooms filled up, they closed the door and moved to the next one. When the money ran out they shut the house. The BBC once made mini-documentaries of this quality for children’s television. youtu.be/s6iMF03aUMs?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
17
48
395
57.5K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@KShabby16334956 I agree. There’s also the idea that discussions of the nature of autism are harmful personal attacks and a threat to autistic people’s very existence.
English
0
0
1
49
KenShabby163
KenShabby163@KShabby16334956·
I see parallels between the way people have reacted to any criticism of autism categories And trans I see exactly the same playbook, the same appeals to emotions and emotional blackmail It's identical in almost every respect.
English
8
6
23
899
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@obrerx She is calling for more research. She is not saying ear defenders don’t work. She’s saying we don’t know if they work. That’s really different. And it’s obvious lived experience is subjective. We all know that.
English
1
0
3
725
Stray Autistic Cat
Stray Autistic Cat@obrerx·
Frith, in the podcast, even wonders if ear defenders help autistics, or if it's just imagined. This is a truly wild, revealing podcast. The good news is she has outed herself as hopelessly narrow-minded & so limited in scope of understanding, she has made herself irrelevant. 1/
Naomi Fisher@naomicfisher

Uta Frith, renowned autism researcher, gives an interview to the TES about autism – and the internet goes wild. We’re told that what she said will put back progress 40 years, that she knows nothing about autism, that she lacks critical thinking and that her words will harm autistic people to the point of suicide. You’d guess she must have said something really awful. Perhaps something deeply offensive about autistic people which reveals her lack of compassion and understanding. Even then, it’s hard to know how one retired academic would have the power to make others commit suicide and to turn back progress to the extent that is predicted. What she said was that she thinks the autism spectrum has expanded too far and that it isn’t helping anyone. Not those who originally received autism diagnoses, and not those who are now getting diagnoses who previously would not have done. She said that she thinks scientific progress is being held back because ‘autism’ now means something so heterogenous that we can’t identify anything that all autistic people share. Nothing biological or neurological, nothing cognitive, nothing behavioural. In her words, there are no markers. The autism spectrum is, in fact, the widest spectrum imaginable. It goes from some of the most disabled people in our society to some of the highest achievers. And there’s no evidence that they have anything in common except their diagnosis. Saying this sort of thing gets you into a lot of trouble online. There are accepted narratives that we are all expected to comply with, and one is the idea that the giant autism spectrum is protective, that it helps people to be included under one diagnosis. Any language which helps people differentiate is banned. Which is odd, because we don’t think that in any other area of medicine. No one says (for example), that we shouldn’t differentiate between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes because it’s protective not to be able to talk about the differences. It’s obvious that differentiating between types of diabetes will lead to better understanding and interventions. If you don’t comply with these narratives about autism – as Uta Frith hasn’t – then you will be publicly shamed. Your expertise will be challenged, even if you have 60 years of experience. You’ll be told that you are harming people and that you are ignorant. Personal slurs are likely to be used against you. And it’s all about social control. Shame is about social control. It’s about creating things that can be said, and things that can’t be said. Others see the shaming and keep quiet. It’s about controlling the narrative so that real discussions can’t be had. I’ve talked to so many clinicians who raise these concerns with me and who then say that they’d never speak up, for fear of shaming and even losing their job. There are important things that are not being talked about, for fear of the repercussions. To my mind, the interesting question is really why. Why is it treated like blasphemy to say that the vast autism spectrum may no longer be fit for purpose? Why are we not allowed to discuss the reality of clinical practice? Why are personal attacks the go-to when scientists disrupt the prevailing narrative? And why are we all so compliant, censoring ourselves to avoid the discomfort of shame? Listen to our podcast with Uta Frith here. open.substack.com/pub/neurosense…

English
9
74
618
38.6K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@CartoonsHateHer All influencers are annoying. The fact the ADHD and autism influencers are also annoying proves nothing.
English
0
0
3
143
Cartoons Hate Her!
Cartoons Hate Her!@CartoonsHateHer·
It's become popular to say that anyone with ADHD or level 1 autism is annoyingly making it up for a "trendy identity." But have you considered that being annoying is part of it? Link in replies.
Cartoons Hate Her! tweet media
English
26
20
378
38.1K
Heathers
Heathers@FancyFeather888·
@frankie2001mia @jennymaria That’s all part of normal human diversity. You’re a human in all our varied manifestations. Why do you feel that is not enough?
English
1
0
1
108
Frankie Last
Frankie Last@frankie2001mia·
@jennymaria So no reason for the social difficulties, sensory issues, delays etc, that seem to exist in many people and tend to be identifiable by professionals?
English
7
0
40
742