Frankee

@bryan_johnson How come this app is free?

This is her vaginal microbiome report. 100/100 score. Top 1% of all vaginas. Her sample is dominated by the single most protective bacterial species a vagina can host (Lactobacillus crispatus). Only about 25-30% of reproductive age women globally are L. crispatus-dominant, and “dominant” usually means above 50%. Kate is at 98.7%. The lab found nothing bad to report. (no gardnerella, Candida, STIs, opportunistic pathogens, aerobic vaginitis markers, etc.) This is linked to lower risk of BV, UTIs, yeast infections, HPV persistence, HSV-2 and HIV acquisition, preterm birth, and improved IVF outcomes. A vaginal microbiome is downstream of everything: sleep, glucose control, stress, gut health, sexual health, immune function, what you eat, and what you put in it.

Just gave Kate oral sex. Goodnight everyone.

@ether_fi @SturdyFinance quite an issue for your Mode deployment

As part of an ongoing effort to harden our cross-chain infrastructure, we'll be deprecating weETH bridging on the following chains: Scroll, Swell, Bera, zkSync, Mode, Blast, Morph, and Sonic Our focus remains on sustained usage and integration depth. Consolidating to fewer, higher-activity chains lets us focus security resources where they matter most Bridging on these chains will be disabled at the end of June. If you hold weETH on any of them, bridge back to Ethereum or another supported chain before then.

@arkham Better as the hacker for @Crema_Finance. Hacker was arrested, money given back to @Crema_Finance (which was deprecated by then), but nothing actually flowed to the victims

The Kyber Network Exploiter is moving stolen funds to Tornado Cash. The attacker, Andean Medjedovic, drained $48.8M from KyberSwap in late 2023. Medjedovic also hacked Indexed Finance for $16.5M, 2 years prior. He was charged by the FBI in 2025. Did he… get away with it?

@LogarithmicRex I think team energy / willingness to fight also plays a great factor. Thinking about @Balancer hack couple of months ago, after 3 days the team had already gave up on making users whole

It's hard for me to wrap my head around this Aave and KelpDAO bailout. Can someone explain to me where this energy was for any of the 123 other hacks >$10MM?

@omgcorn @apyx_fi maybe a comment?

Let Yearn worry about where the exits are: curation.yearn.fi

LayerZero shot Aave in the leg and brought McDonald’s to the hospital

@Wilson19947653 @dcfgod @0xRamenUmai I agree. Anything shy of 30k ETH is a insult, all the more when you brag doing 100m+ ARR

@dcfgod @0xRamenUmai LayerZero shot Aave in the leg and brought McDonald’s to the hospital

rsETH hole filling tracker: Hole: 112204 rsETH = 118.4k ETH Lido: -2.5k ETH Etherfi: -5k ETH Arbitrum freeze: -30.7k ETH 80.2k ETH left to find

@Cryptoyieldinfo @paoloardoino @tether I think we could imagine that if @tether participates in the bailout, then @aave reduces its cut/fee to 0 on USDT for let's say 5 years, while increasing proportionally its fee on @circle USDC Best way for USDT to become more prevalent in Defi

@aave @fraxfinance It's amazing that @fraxfinance is considering putting some money to bail out Kelp / Aave while having zero incentive to do so and zero responsibility in the mess, while @LayerZero_Core is burying its head under the sand while being the most to blame for this mess

Now our partners at @fraxfinance join the fold. They will soon share a DAO proposal with details on the collaboration. DeFi United.

@CatOnInkChain @inkonchain @tydrohq Bro what tydro did is a disgrace. You can't tweet "everythign is fine, we are not impactedd", the let insider exit, and then say "sorry for those who stayed you have lost 20%" Absolutely egrerious

📊 Weekly @Inkonchain Ecosystem Stats (Part 1/2) ▫️ $284m TVL (-41% in 7d!) ▫️ $207m @Tydrohq TVL (-24% in 7d!) ▫️ 22K New Addresses (+769% WoW) ▫️ 8.5M Total Addresses (+179% in 7d!) ▫️ $281m Stablecoin MCAP (+$148.1m WoW) ▫️ $176m Ink Bridge Netflow 👇 More insights in Parts 2

@0xkingsmans @inkonchain @tydrohq Bro @tydrohq is 100% cooked if the rsETH situation doesn't resolve positively

Tydro Season 1 Snapshot Taken Tydro Points Season 2 🌪️ Officially Started ➖Supply On Tydro & Earn Ink Points ➖Season 2 Will Continue Upto The TGE app.tydro.com Supported Assets 👇 • USDT0 • USDG • wETH • kBTC • GHO Points Tied to a Future $INK airdrop - designed to reward early LPs and active participants

@Peri_83 @aave Above all this is happening 48h after @tydrohq writing on twitter "we are not affected, everythign allright" but having 39% of TVL exiting in the meantime. Feels like @tydrohq @krakenfx @ink allowed insiders to exit first before freezing markets

Ojito porque se viene una guarrada seria. ¿La brillante idea de unos Iluminatis ahora es que el ETH depositado por usuarios en otras L2 dentro de @aave se utilice para ayudar a cubrir una deuda creada por terceros? ¿Pero estamos locos o qué cojones es esto? Es como si viene el banco y te dice: como eres cliente y al vecino le han robado, ahora tú ayudas a compensarlo con tu dinero. 😱😱😱 Esa es la dirección que, al menos desde fuera, parece que están trazando @aave y @tydrohq. Y sinceramente, muy mala pinta. Primero se publica un post diciendo que no había exposición por parte de los usuarios, luego ese post desaparece (primera imagen), y ahora el discurso cambia. Si primero afirmas una cosa y luego haces la contraria, normal que la gente desconfíe. Para mí el tema es muy simple: Los depósitos de usuarios no deberían socializar pérdidas ajenas sin consentimiento claro y explícito. Si alguien deposita ETH esperando lending normal, no está firmando rescates ocultos. Todo esto viene impulsado por @aave, @KelpDAO, @LayerZero_Core y ahora parece que @tydrohq también se posiciona de ese lado. Si una red o un protocolo permite este tipo de precedentes, cuidado con la confianza que se destruye. Porque una cosa es gestionar riesgos, y otra muy distinta es cargar errores o agujeros sobre usuarios que no los provocaron... Veremos en qué acaba, pero desde luego huele muy mal. @inkonchain

@Hada92734129 @inkonchain @aave Super good question. @inkfndhq @krakenfx have been doing a terrible job here

Accountability Crisis: Who is responsible for the $rsETH risk on @Tydro_fi? The recent $rsETH incident has exposed a massive gap in accountability for users on the @inkonchain network. After seeking clarification in the @aave Discord, the reality is now clear: “Tydro is a fork of Aave, not an Aave-governed deployment… it is operated and governed separately. Chaos Labs is the Risk Admin, and the Ink instance is governed by the Ink Foundation.” This changes everything. This was NOT an Aave DAO decision. This was a localized decision made by the @inkonchain ecosystem leadership and their partners. The Billion-Dollar Question: Who specifically approved the listing of $rsETH as collateral on @Tydro_fi with the current leverage parameters? Was it: 1️⃣ The **Ink Foundation** (@inkonchain) – as the ultimate governors of the chain? 2️⃣ The **Tydro Team** (@Tydro_fi) – as the protocol developers? 3️⃣ **Chaos Labs** (@ChaosLabs) – as the designated Risk Admin? Why this matters: On the main Aave protocol, every asset listing goes through a transparent governance process. The community votes, risks are debated in public, and the Aave Safety Module stands as a backstop. On Tydro, users had **ZERO vote** and **ZERO say**. Yet, we are the ones currently exposed to the systemic risk created by a closed-door decision. We were encouraged to bridge our assets to Ink and deposit into Tydro, trusting that the "Aave-tech" came with Aave-level risk management. Instead, we found ourselves in a siloed fork with no safety net. Responsibility vs. Risk: This is not "market unfairness" or a simple price drop. Listing a specific asset like $rsETH, setting its LTV, and then freezing the entire market are protocol-level executive decisions. If the risk was introduced at the architectural level by the Risk Admin or the Foundation, the responsibility for the "bad debt" or liquidity crunch should not fall on the shoulders of innocent depositors. We demand clarity on: 1. The specific risk assessment report for $rsETH on Tydro prior to listing. 2. The decision-making trail: Who signed off on these parameters? 3. The compensation plan: How will @inkonchain and @Tydro_fi protect users from a situation they didn't vote for? User trust is the only currency that matters for a new L2. If @inkonchain allows its early adopters to be "haircut" due to poor risk management by its hand-picked partners, the network's reputation will be permanently tarnished before it even fully launches. We are watching. We are waiting for a solution, not just an "incident report." CC: @StaniKulechov @aave @ChaosLabs @inkonchain @Tydro_fi #DeFi #InkNetwork #Tydro #Aave #CryptoSafety #rsETH #ChaosLabs

@tydrohq Quite a joke that: - you first communicated no exposure to the incident - let insiders exit - now talk about socializing losses among people who trusted you

Status update: We continue to pursue a plan that intends to avoid socialization of bad debt among lenders on Tydro. This requires coordination across multiple parties and resolution of how losses will be allocated across mainnet and L2s. Thank you for your patience. Please follow official channels for updates.

@aave What about on Ink?

Update on rsETH incident: WETH reserves on the Ethereum Core V3 market have been unfrozen and users can supply WETH to Ethereum Core V3 again. WETH LTV remains at 0. WETH reserves on Ethereum Prime, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle, and Linea remain frozen. Aave service providers will continue to work on next steps and provide updates accordingly.

@DeFi_Dad @Nomaticcap @krakenfx In any case I doubt @krakenfx and @inkfndhq let @tydrohq die right after launch. If losses are concentrated on L2, and no bailout from @krakenfx and @inkfndhq, then the whole Ink chain is dead before taking off with significant PR damage for Kraken ahead of IPO

@Nomaticcap @krakenfx Yes’ love to see @krakenfx involved.

If I’m understanding the 2 scenarios here where either all rsETH positions (L1 and L2) are marked down and you risk some bad debt / haircut across Aave ETH lenders on all networks or you recognize all the unbacked rsETH on just L2s where they bare a bigger loss (which seems insane to me)… Why can’t there be a third scenario where a hero steps in to plug the hole through some debt repayment program? DeFi is not just profit-driven. There is enormous ego in this space. Huge moment for a white knight to step up. This would be the best outcome for all affected users. Kinda surprised if a CEX doesn’t see opportunity in this, ie @Bybit_Official, @coinbase, @binance

@Trantor2140 So where is going Wintermute's interest? Who's taking it?

@Feline_cap Hey mate. It is not a rebasing or interest accruing token. Eva markets enables users to have fully liquid positions with the ability to earn in LP. It is 1:1 with the dollar

the incentives will continue, the growth will continue.

@racistbilbo @Alt_Azn You're thinking they are Mexican, but they are probably Filipinos.

@Alt_Azn My mexican neighbors have sung karaoke for the past 3 christmas eves at like 4000 decibles from 9pm until 8am, so loud that even with 3 doors between us I can still hear it like theyre in the same fucking room. When I asked them to stop they just gave me that third world stare.

The Sabrina Carpenter incident reminded me of this Atlantic article originally titled “Why do White People Love Quiet?”. The author was shocked that when she went to an Ivy League school her classmates expected her not to blast music at 2 in the morning. Instead of internalizing this is how normal people act she made it racial.

@Shaughnessy119 Maybe let's stop using USDC? - doesn't give back yield to customers - doesn't freeze coins going to North Korea - Through Coinbase blocks crypto legislation Why as a community are we using the worst option possible?

Circle not freezing the USDC is hilarious because we know it’s centralized but they’re like nah, we’ll let the money freely flow to North Korea I like USDC since it’s a programmable stablecoin for all of DeFi and enables innovation But we can freeze the money flowing to NK