Harry

@DrewPavlou Few deserve it more.

Holy shit, Islamist extremists tried to lynch the Australian Prime Minister this morning at Lakemba Mosque.

Lady, your resistance to reality is incredible. Just call them and ask. - You could eat in the cafeteria. - Then they designated that you couldn't. - For ramadan. - Which is what the email is about. That you don't understand this is more strong evidence it was a mistake to let women vote and hold public office. Totally wild you'd think it's reasonable someone wrote all that to effectively say no change, and think that makes sense lmao.

@Flashman577 …. As designated. And their designated areas are lower gym hallway and lower east hallway

Someone has suggested I create a thread containing some of my explainer threads. A meta explainer thread, if you will...😁 They cover both science and UK politics. I hope others continue to find them useful. I'll update this as and when I do more of them👍 🧵of 🧵s

@ryangerritsen I wonder if either of them even know who she is?

I watched this, so now you have to. Witness a horrible person that talks like a 16 year old valley girl discuss in her bizarre reality what she thought of the interview between Rogan and Pierre. What a petty jealous person who, instead of just leaving it alone just had to say something.

@MarcScottEmery It's maddening how one person who contributed so little and who cost society so much walks around alive, while some of the best people Canada ever raised died prematurely.

If you want to read about Canada’s most notorious Troon, check out meowmix.online It is the encyclopedia online about the Many Lives of Jessica Simpson, nee Jonathan Yaniv. It catalogs the now 100+ vexatious litigations by Canada’s Troon. A treasure chest of info!

That's absolutely not true, and frankly sounds like something a civilian would say. One's identification in the military is based on one's element, trade, corps, rank, appointment and unit. Sometimes even sub or sub sub unit. Weird to even have to say that. If a civilian asked me what I did in the military, my specific rank would be like the tenth thing I mentioned if they asked. Be very weird to say "I was a Major" vs "I was an infantry officer." Or army leader if you think they might not know what the infantry or officers are. The CAF writing standard - and PA guidance in general - when speaking to or writing for non military audiences is to use layperson terminology. As I say, "infantry commander" in his case seems to be lame and overwrought, but technically correct presuming he was at least a Cpl who at some point was in command of at least one other soldier 🤷‍♂️ Not to burst your bubble, but civvies don't really know or care about ranks beyond very broad strokes.

@Flashman577 @JoshuaBurton @MarcMillerVM Yes, it is incorrect. The language that's used in the military is precise. We identify ourselves by rank. Not role. Identifying by role serves only to mislead those who aren't knowledgeable regarding the hierarchy.

Don’t have mine. Don’t need one on a range under supervision. I was a small arms instructor in the army, though, way back when.

@ImMeme0 It's crazy. I'm convinced there's a very organized group of KKK filming these to make everyone racist, even the blacks.

Imagine walking too close to a pool table full of guys in a match, getting accidentally bumped, the guy immediately saying “I’m sorry,” then uploading the video to score victim points and make him look like the bad guy.

The screenshots you posted actually perfectly establish that it's happening 🤣 It says precisely that. They could eat in the cafeteria... now they can't. If you call the school, they'll tell you the same thing 🤷‍♂️ What's really remarkable to me is that you'd read that email - all that detail - and end up convincing yourself that someone wrote it to communicate no change to the existing arrangements. That's the sort of reasoning that could only make sense to a woman; much sound and fury, signifying and communicating nothing. It's bizarre to think it's reasonable someone would write all that rather than just saying "the present food free areas remain food free throughout ramadan." It's bizarre you don't understand the syntax of "will be," either. Quite obviously, if it already be, "will be" makes no sense.

@Flashman577 Of course I have. You being entirely incapable of understanding it isn’t my problem😂

@JPM_Canada @scotiangunownr @JoshuaBurton @MarcMillerVM What's unclear?

@CDNsForTrump @JoshuaBurton @CrudeOil4Life @MarcMillerVM Boot. That was the word I was looking for.

@JoshuaBurton @CrudeOil4Life @MarcMillerVM LMFAO a cpl calling themselves an infantry commander is the most boot move ever

A Corporal is an NCO. Cpls and MCpls are junior NCOs, and if they commanded at least one other person, could reasonably if not hyperbolicly be called a "commander." But... ew. I was many ranks above corporal, and I think unless you were a CO or higher, describing it that way is overwrought.

@JoshuaBurton @MarcMillerVM Mcpl is doable in 4 years in the reserves, I did it. That could technically make him an “infantry commander” if he was a section commander, which should be a Sgt, but can often be a MCpl in the reserves. Usually MCpl is section 2ic though.

@JoshuaBurton @DeputyTM_Canada @MarcMillerVM @erinotoole Taking nothing away from O'Toole's service, but an ex infantry corporal - even a reserve one - could have like a tour or two in Bosnia or Croatia and three in combat in Afghanistan lmao. If it was listed by position like it is for OToole, it would just say as "rifleman, RCR."

@DeputyTM_Canada @MarcMillerVM Here's @erinotoole's as a comparison.

@JoshuaBurton @MarcMillerVM A Corporal is a non-comissioned officer, and they can have leadership responsibilities. Which is to say it's not technically incorrect to call a corporal a commander if they commanded, like, at least one other soldier.

Marc. You were a 16 year old reservist, and you did 4 years before quitting. "Small Arms instructor" literally translates to "I read the range safety rules out loud from a book" ALSO - Please correct the record on Parl.ca - Your RANK was not "Infantry commander" - that's not a RANK. Your RANK was Corporal, at best, given your age. Without a degree, you were NOT an officer. Something smells fishy. I can absolutely ATIP this if you want. lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo…

Such a basic concept that Deep Battle was the Soviet doctrine for 70+ years, from the 20s to the end of the USSR. Odd that the old school Uke officers aren't familiar with it, or don't appreciate the ideas in it. And it's exactly the same ideas that are in AirLand Battle, the US doctrine through the Cold War. What you're describing is exactly how manoeuvre warfare is supposed to work. What you're saying would be regarded by a NATO officer as basic adherence to manoeuvre concepts, and all of it is enshrined in US & allied strategy, doctrine and TTPs. Even in the Afghanistan & Iraq insurgency context - IED defeat isn't done at the side of the road, it's ideally done several steps before that. Disrupt the financing, construction and leadership cells. Or with a boat - the first priority with flooding is to stop it, not pump the water out.

x.com/armyinformcomu… I find it ironic how there's an article about something that is an extremely basic concept in war. Like where were the geniuses 12+ months ago?? Pretty easy concept: 1: disrupt cohesion, don't just destroy forces 2: operating across the enemy's entire depth to slow the move towards 0. 3: creating cascading failures in decision-making by applying pressure at command & control as well as logistics and travel points/routes. 4: applying pressure where the enemy is weak, this is largely in its rear areas, not at the 0. If you want to break the front to move forward you need to break the back first. Been saying this for over a year now and was heavily criticized for it by some leadership. Applying pressure further from the FLOT will create breathing room for the infantry quicker than trying to kill the enemy at the 0. You don't fix a leaking faucet with tape, nor do you defeat a much larger attrition ready enemy at the 0. We do not need to reinvent the wheel; we just need to utilize it better than the enemy who is still stuck in its doctrine of attritional warfare. And if you honestly think about it, drones aren't rewriting war/warfare they are increasing the ability of a force who is based around maneuver warfare to do what they do best, attack the system, create gaps, fill gaps and move vs slugging it out at the 0.

@LibRightOpinion @planefag "right now" Like the Mitch Hedberg joke... "NATO used to suck. It still does, but it used to, too."

@planefag This is just NATO as an alliance right now:

Ok!

Well, as for preceding governments, the Irish PM in 1945 personally went to the German ambassador to give his condolences for Hitler's suicide. And the last President gave condolences when the Butcher of Tehran rightfully got biblical payback, dying in a helo crash. So yeah, not great so far.

@BerzekSavant @srsattern And tbf; with how exceedingly g h e y the current Irish Governemnt [and I'm sure preceding ones as well for that matter] and the Provisional IRA is, as well as the Irish affinity for Third Worldism... I can't remember a based notable Irishman other than Michael Collins.

Blue hair in the Pre Check line “I love your pendant, what tribe is that?” “Choctaw Nation, thank you.” “Where is that at?” “Oklahoma” “It’s really good to see the culture coming back- ” “I mean, it ain’t never left.” “Oh, of course! You know, can you believe all the stuff in MN?” “I know, right? It’s like they can’t deport them fast enough… I honestly wish they would just cut us wagon burners loose on them… do you like effigy mounds?” 👀 *brain breaks in half* Literally one of my favorite pass times. Never gets old.

@BerzekSavant @srsattern In many ways it beats the prior alterative for getting off the island; "be captured in a Barbary pirate slave raid"

@srsattern Yeah, the Irish part of me can only hate the English part just so much. I mean, they weren't EVER getting off that island on their own.

@srsattern @BerzekSavant High price paid for them, though. And it presumes there was no alternative route to arriving at today that didn't involve 85% of the native population dying after contact. OTOH, if any native nation was in a position to do the same thing then, they would have.

@BerzekSavant I’m talking to you on an iPhone and I have an M4. Did we really tho? In the long run?

@Jeffrey28627067 @srsattern @fivegeedubya Tell me you've never savored the most dangerous game without telling me you've never savored the most dangerous game...

@srsattern @fivegeedubya Probably not very good. Apex predators are rarely particularly tasty.

@fivegeedubya @srsattern Smart. They eat all the fish. Like how the people who most want to blast elephants are the poor African fucks who get their gardens eaten by them. Liking elephants and hippos and shit is a luxury white people belief.

@srsattern I still remember when the natives up in Washington wanted to shoot Orcas with barret .50 cals.

@HitGarageDoor @MichaelCue97159 @srsattern This is the best insult I've heard in a very long time. The exact people it applies to won't get it.

@MichaelCue97159 @srsattern Your greens come out of a can, you Yankee fuck.