Florrie Ford

@VicktoriaSponge @SVPhillimore The context was the racists didn’t wavy black people in the same school.

@FlorrieFory213 @SVPhillimore The views in those photos are unacceptable & now illegal because they make it clear that Black people shouldn’t be educated. Trans people have a right to education. They don’t have the right to have it in a girls’ school if they are male. You want special ADDITIONAL rights.

We have done amazingly well in 7 years, battling captured state agents all the way and clawing back fundamental human rights that were very nearly destroyed. It is astonishing that this is reframed as a 'greased slope' and that women who demand their rights are motivated by 'hate' - but of course we are dealing with a cohort who believe that men are women just because they say they are. So it is not surprising.

@nolasage218 @tinternetqueen @EKaht @women_could @SVPhillimore The correct context is important. It not reasonable to segregate-away trans people just because you don’t want them in the vicinity.

@FlorrieFory213 @tinternetqueen @EKaht @women_could @SVPhillimore Dr Upton said he would not exclude if specifically requested

@Rorythecraptory @miffythegamer The Killiechassie Karen

Not a cu*t. #Terf #Cult

We need more fun and whimsy like this in our lives.

Naomi Osaka after beating Donna Vekic at Roland Garros “You entered with a new dress. For the first match you wore a black dress. The one today was white. Do you have a dress for every match?” Naomi: “You know, I like to keep people on their toes. 😂 I think it’s really fun. I feel like there’s a community that’s been built over my on-court outfits. I just like to keep you guys guessing. I really enjoy that you guys enjoy.” ❤️

Your high school essay pretends to be about “material reality” and women’s rights, but its real purpose is to normalise exclusion of trans people from public life - while (trying to) sounding calm and intellectual. It’s neither. It repeatedly frames trans women as inherently male, threatening, deceptive, or incompatible with female safety. Terms like “male-bodied people” are not neutral language. They are emotional framing designed to provoke fear - pretty fucking shitty tbh. The Supreme Court didnt rule that trans people can be humiliated, excluded wholesale, or treated as predators. Trans people still have legal protections, and any exclusion under the EQA must be proportionate and justified - not ideological. Your high school essay also presents trans equality as a “power claim” against women, AS IF a tiny, almost microscopic minority asking to exist safely in society somehow ‘oppresses the majority’ - oh please listen to yourself! Thats not feminism it’s scapegoating. Most importantly, you offer abstract support for trans rights while constructing a worldview in which trans people are unwelcome in almost EVERY meaningful social space. Thats not coexistence. Its 1950’s segregation dressed up as reasonableness. Shame on you.

Trans Rights: The Conjuring Trick at the Toilet Door The toilet debate is a conjuring trick. And it is time to name it as one. Scroll through social media and you would think the entire argument about the Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC Code came down to a single question: which toilet does a trans person use? That framing is not accidental. It is a strategy, chosen precisely because it makes women's objections look petty and obsessive, reduces a sweeping legal settlement about women's fundamental rights to a single emotionally charged doorway, and keeps women permanently on the defensive. Here is what the debate is actually about. The ONS Census found that 0.54 per cent of people in England and Wales report a gender identity different from their birth sex. Within that figure, fewer than half have any outward transgender appearance. No medical treatment. No social transition. Self-identification alone. Roughly one in two hundred people. These people's rights matter. The right not to be harassed, not to face discrimination, not to be subjected to violence: those are absolute. But rights are not the same thing as demands. And the demand that fifty-one per cent of the population surrender sex-based protections won through a century of organised political struggle is not a rights claim. It is a power claim. On 16 April 2025, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that "woman" and "man" in the Equality Act refer to biological sex. Unanimously. Not a narrow majority. Every justice on the bench. The ruling also confirmed that trans people retain full legal protection under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment. Both protections stand in law. What the ruling refused to do was allow one to erase the other. The EHRC Code, now laid before Parliament, covers far more than toilets. It covers domestic violence refuges. Single-sex hospital wards. Communal changing rooms. Intimate personal care. Competitive sport. Women's right to meet, organise and associate as women. It states plainly that a service for women and trans women is not a single-sex service. That a refuge admitting male-bodied people is not a refuge from male violence. These are not cruel statements. They are logical ones. Nurses have been hauled before employment tribunals for understanding this. Working class women with mortgages and families, doing physical, demanding work, punished for knowing that a female ward means what it says. Anyone who objects is branded a bigot, a transphobe, a hater. The accusation is the weapon. And like all weapons discharged without discrimination, it has destroyed its own utility: words that once carried genuine moral weight have been debased into instruments of political enforcement, fired at nurses, mothers, lesbians, gay men and scientists for the sole offence of stating material reality. This is a liberal campaign. It is not a left-wing one. The left begins with material reality. Bodies. Class. Violence. Women are not oppressed because of how they feel about being female. They are oppressed because they are female. A left politics that cannot say what a woman is has abandoned women, not theoretically, but actually: in tribunals, in refuges, on wards, on sports fields, in the silencing of anyone who says out loud what most people know to be true. Read more here labourheartlands.com/trans-rights-t… #womensrights #womensrightsarehumanrights #transrights

@VicktoriaSponge @SVPhillimore You mean they didn’t know their place. Yes, they said that about black people too. Even said they were “disgusting”.

@FlorrieFory213 @SVPhillimore In the 90s & 00s, when I personally might have been an activist, I wasn’t because I wasn’t having issues with TIMs. What happened since is that they totally overstepped boundaries, broke laws & become disgustingly entitled to point of centring their own needs above everyone else

@coaxialcreature @JillCollier16 @crit_gen @women_could @SVPhillimore “I think” then “..many want” But not all, possibly the majority don’t care but want doctors and nurses just to get well again. This is the point - the genital-obsessed think they speak for a majority, they don’t.

@FlorrieFory213 @JillCollier16 @crit_gen @women_could @SVPhillimore I'm not assuming either all patients nor anti-trans. I think when a woman is having an intimate procedure, many want a doctor who is a woman. Just because she doesn't want a man there, doesn't mean she's anti-man. And again, this particular woman made it clear she

@nikolbethchlo @women_could @SVPhillimore I’m a brand new account, I spend 99% of my life in the real world, so I could care less about nonsense like ‘ratios’ Sit down.

@FlorrieFory213 @women_could @SVPhillimore Just noticed the ratio 🤣

@ChtyCommission It’s now widely regarded as beyond a joke that ‘Sex Matters’ retain charity status while their directors have routinely engaged in harassment of trans people and now, even innocent employees. You need to grow a spine and deal with this reality. You are walking a very thin line to negligence and a public law judicial review.

@newsandpics Not true. In high profile cases they often approach the prosecutor to seek guidance.

Police only pass on a file if they believe there is enough evidence to support a charge.

Nicola Sturgeon was not “cleared by the police” - those reporting she was are wrong. It’s not how it works in Scotland. She was investigated, police submitted a file of evidence to the Crown Office, which decided not to prosecute. The police believed there was a case to answer.🧵

@LightninLex @JeanHatchet ALEKS KOVAČEVIĆ.

@JeanHatchet @FlorrieFory213 Just enjoy the crying like I am, it could be anything for such a mad fragile loser

This man’s attitude towards a woman was abysmal and undoubtedly because of his direct opposition to her clearly expressed GC views - which might be discriminatory towards her in asking her to leave because he holds different views. But unless there were some spaces that were ONLY for men - whilst there were NONE for ONLY women it wasn’t “breaking the law”. That’s the issue. We don’t have law or guidance which guarantees women single sex spaces. We should have. But we don’t. If women think the draft Code of Practice just released by Bridget Phillipson (which some groups are cheering about) gave women that they’ve been misled. If businesses want to use only mixed sex changing spaces or toilets then they can (and probably will if it saves money and means they aren’t targeted by “trans” bullies). Some of the people/groups claiming we had a win for women are being incredibly dishonest because they know they should really have fought harder to provide those spaces by targeting their activism at the Gender Recognition Act 2004. They know this. But continuing to take individual discrimination cases to court is more profitable than fighting tooth and nail to get rid of “Gender Reassignment” from the Equality Act and to abolish the GRA which underpins it. Men pretending to be women should have no legal backing at all. It’s a ludicrous lie. It led us down a path where it is less and less likely to see women able to legally insist on single-sex toilets and changing rooms. I do wish some of the lauded leaders would stop getting pretend outraged at something they effectively support by not joining the fight to repeal the Gender Recognition Act. It is their moral obligation to women or they are not worth their salt. This is also not “backbiting” whatever some man not even living here anymore says - it’s just true.

@coaxialcreature @JillCollier16 @crit_gen @women_could @SVPhillimore You’re logically assuming all patients are anti/trans or however you want to describe yourselves. You don’t get to do that. Sit down.

@JillCollier16 @FlorrieFory213 @crit_gen @women_could @SVPhillimore I think I interpreted the article/question differently. At some point, she made it clear she didn’t want a male helping with the smear test, and it doesn’t matter when: the man lying to her about ‘not being male’ shouldn’t have.

@DarrenMoul93444 @SRandamach35675 @women_could @SVPhillimore A simple trans nurse or doctor in a ward. How are they‘validating’ or how are patients ‘validating’ them? You can’t explain, as you’re literally a foaming-at-the-mouth extremist. Sit down.

@FlorrieFory213 @SRandamach35675 @women_could @SVPhillimore No, anyone who puts their validation above the care needs of their patients. As we’re talking about TIMs, a huge majority are perverted, degenerate men, who should not care for vulnerable women. Any woman has the right to not have a man in a wig give intimate care.

@HTheCritical @women_could @SVPhillimore Source? I assume it a genital-obsessed source - so completely reliable. Sit down.

@FlorrieFory213 @women_could @SVPhillimore

@tinternetqueen @women_could @SVPhillimore Evidence. Until then, sit down.

@FlorrieFory213 @women_could @SVPhillimore It’s already been done bozo..hospitals have had to issue formal public apologies. Are you really this thick, or are you hoping to fool ppl seeing the thread?

@JudgeOfPassing @KatarinaHill2 @crit_gen @women_could @SVPhillimore If that’s your ‘evidence’ I would skewer you in court 🤣

@FlorrieFory213 @KatarinaHill2 @crit_gen @women_could @SVPhillimore Yep! Evidence was given to you above and you’re ignoring it becuse it’s inconvenient for you.

@tinternetqueen @EKaht @women_could @SVPhillimore The hospitals and staff are there for patients benefit. Autonomy in intimate care is a right, but doesn’t allow bigots to totally exclude minorities from presence in wards or conducting triage stage assessments. Frankly - most people would benefit if bigots wore a marker…

@FlorrieFory213 @EKaht @women_could @SVPhillimore 😂 Patients are not there for the health workers benefit. Everyone has an immutable sex. Anyone breaching patient autonomy for their own benefit is a predator.

@corn1882 @JeanHatchet Poor tweet. I haven’t a clue what you’re on about. Sit down.

@FlorrieFory213 @JeanHatchet I think I still have my east Tilbury summer SAS club certificate... we spent ages making those in our den in the 1980's I had no idea it meant we was actually SAS because we had a piece of paper