Flow
34.8K posts

Flow
@FlowTraderTM
80 iq. poor. tip of the spear @OstiumLabs.



Mark it up




okay so i’ve now talked to both gpt-5.5 and opus 4.7 a bit. they’ve clearly been trained to be less sycophantic but they still do sycophancy-adjacent things i wonder if anyone has coined words for - one i might call “microglazing” by analogy with microaggressions, and the other is something like “frame accommodation” or “frame submission”? so far they’ll pretty much always operate in the frame you offer and won’t spontaneously pop out of it into another one (possibly except to intervene in a dangerous situation, idk). how are other people talking about this?

I’ll just leave this here


Ostium offers lower cost of leverage than any traditional broker. A trade does not end at the fill. Execution determines your entry, but the cost of keeping the position matters more the longer it stays open. @OstiumLabs carry model ties that cost to the underlying market. Commodities can reference futures term structure, FX can reference interest rate differentials, and equities can reference USD margin borrowing costs. Carry moves with the market instead of positioning on a single perp venue. Across assets, Ostium’s average carry is below 5% annually, putting its cost of leverage below traditional brokers like IBKR Lite and Schwab while avoiding the funding spikes that make longer holds harder to model. The gap is wider against onchain perp venues. Ostium commodities averaged 3.3% carry versus 7.4% for Hyperliquid commodities which can save thousands in financing costs. Ostium brings institutional-grade execution to global assets onchain with lower holding costs than the venues traders use today.













