


FlyIt
1K posts

@FlyItRealFast
I’m an engineer. I believe all technology should be both ergonomic and intuitive. MEGASTRUCTURES! US must lead in AI. Moon → Mars → Ceres → Stars. 🇺🇸 🚀 🦾









Tugs will enable 50% more landed mass on lunar surface than putting the lunar landers directly into TLI. Without going into too much detail here, the general idea is to launch a stack (tug and lunar lander) into LEO. The current limit is 57 MT with Falcon 9 Heavy in partially expendable mode. The actual landed lunar mass will scale with LEO launch capacity. The tug performs TLI and LOI. The stack then separates. The lander remains in a circular LLO until commanded to descend to the lunar surface. The tug performs a TEI and uses aerobraking to renter LEO. I have some ideas about a reusable heat shield that would enable multiple round trips between LEO and LLO using the same tug. You can land 1.5 times more mass on the lunar surface using this technique than you can by putting a lander directly into a TLI trajectory. This will require on-orbit refueling (LH2) and a NTP engine in the tug. I assumed an Isp of 800 s for the tug and 350 s for the lander. The technology required to do this already exists, or is just over the horizon. Tugs will enable a much faster buildout of lunar infrastructure than would otherwise be possible. 🇺🇸 🚀 🦾 @CrainTim @Jason_Lil_Kim @astrobotic @blueorigin @SpaceX






That is not correct. You can look up what the SLS Block 1B cargo variant can send to TLI, and that mass is well below the public MK2 data. And to be clear, NASA is very focused on assisting Blue Origin with root cause analysis, pad recovery, and, most importantly, continuing to advance a lander that can meet Artemis III and crewed landing timelines.




