Foddmann

1.9K posts

Foddmann

Foddmann

@Foddmann

Katılım Şubat 2020
1.5K Takip Edilen103 Takipçiler
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@auralian420 @PWestoff @elonmusk @zannymb Non-Hispanic white US homicide rates are typically 2.5-4.6 per 100k, lower than the national average but higher than most Western European countries’ overall rates of under 2 per 100k.
English
0
0
0
1
Paul Weston
Paul Weston@PWestoff·
Elon @elonmusk believes civil-war is coming to Britain. @zannymb mocks him. But Musk's neurological thinking is that of a cold-blooded computer operating on data, logic and pattern recognition. Zany Zanny's neurological thinking is emotional, data-free, and illogical. Musk succeeds so spectacularly because he grasps the reality of reality, be it science, engineering, or what will be political/social history tomorrow. The Zany creature's misplaced arrogance prevents her from recognising Musk's "Reality Genius" and shows in real time her acute affliction of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
English
69
142
710
49.1K
Pure Guava
Pure Guava@pureguava10300·
Weird how the 9 old boy who mowed down and killed 9 monks the other day wasn't forces to apologise like this. facebook.com/share/v/1DwWPu…
Thanon Nakhon Chai Si, Thailand 🇹🇭 English
18
6
60
16.5K
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@kchuvala @SamanthaJPower If no one died from the cuts, why should Gates and Bezos step in to fund the program? He contradicts himself—Musk is a midwit.
English
1
0
6
34
ParodyGuy
ParodyGuy@kchuvala·
@SamanthaJPower Musk's spot on. You really need to think about what he says here. I mean with both halves of your brain.
English
6
0
17
312
Samantha Power
Samantha Power@SamanthaJPower·
Musk continues to peddle the lie that no one has died from USAID’s cuts. His latest excuse? Private donors and NGOs could’ve filled the gap. But DOGE abruptly terminated 83% of USAID programs, leaving no time for a responsible handover. They didn’t care.
The Economist@TheEconomist

.@elonmusk says zero people died from DOGE cuts to USAID. The billionaire CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, in his own words, helped feed the policy to the woodchipper last year, when he was the head of America’s Department of Government Efficiency. In an exclusive interview, @zannymb, The Economist’s editor-in-chief, challenges his claims: bit.ly/3RNqFnH

English
197
579
1.8K
140.1K
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@SamanthaJPower She should have asked the follow-up question: If no one died, why should Gates and Bezos step in to fund the program? He contradicts himself. Elpn Musk is a midwit.
English
0
0
1
52
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@raelbrav She did a great job. Asked critical questions—exactly what journalism is about.
English
0
0
0
20
Rael Braverman
Rael Braverman@raelbrav·
This woman, Editor-In-Chief at the Economist , is excruciatingly painful to listen to. It’s people like her that are allowing the West to be destroyed. Luxury belief brigade in all its glory.
Squawk Box@SquawkCNBC

.@TheEconomist Editor-In-Chief @zannymb on her wide-ranging interview with @elonmusk: "It's irresponsible for someone who has 240 million followers to propagate things that are simply not true." cnb.cx/4fz6t0A

English
425
946
12.2K
720.2K
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@marsfoole People think The Economist is left or even far-left, while they in fact are centrist/classical liberals/libertarians.
English
0
0
0
17
marsfoole
marsfoole@marsfoole·
Leftist white women are among the most destructive forces in human history. They believe their feelings create reality. They will look at a burning house and insist it’s not on fire just to spite men. Smug, self-righteous, smirking mommy brains.
Squawk Box@SquawkCNBC

.@TheEconomist Editor-In-Chief @zannymb on her wide-ranging interview with @elonmusk: "It's irresponsible for someone who has 240 million followers to propagate things that are simply not true." cnb.cx/4fz6t0A

English
9
7
99
1.9K
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@HiEvery1_ItsMe @marksotoges @r0ck3t23 Not always true. They’ve been pressing Macron, Starmer and Biden as well in their interviews. Problem is people think The Economist is left or even far-left, while they in fact are centrist/classical liberals/libertarians.
English
1
0
0
26
Hi!
Hi!@HiEvery1_ItsMe·
@Foddmann @marksotoges @r0ck3t23 If they treated everyone they interview this way, than no problem. However, they turn into sycophants when they interview people on their “side”.
English
1
0
0
25
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk was called a racist on camera by the editor-in-chief of The Economist. An accusation that serious should have come with proof. Hers came from no one. Zanny Minton Beddoes: “People say that you’re a racist.” People say. No evidence. No incident. No source. No name. “People say” removes the journalist’s fingerprints from the accusation. Nothing to verify. No one to hold accountable. A label laundered through a question so it can never be traced back to a fact. Musk: “My partner is half Indian. I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. If you look at the people employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races.” The accusation cost nothing to make. The defense required a man to put his own family on the table. Then she moved on. No pause. Not one word of his answer made it into the next question. Beddoes: “Are you anti-Muslim?” The first accusation was still on the ground. The next was already in the air. Musk: “I’m against people coming to a country with antithetical views. I’m against rape and murder. I’m against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we’ve come to accept in the West.” He answered with positions no functioning society disputes. The only way to make them sound like bigotry was to attach a religion to the people he was describing. That isn’t journalism. It’s a trap where the question does the accusing and the answer does the rest. Musk: “I think it’s a crying shame that the traditional media, like you, don’t recognize this.” To her face. To the editor-in-chief of one of the most powerful publications on Earth. When a man has to prove he isn’t a racist by naming his own children, then defend himself for opposing rape and murder, the labels have stopped describing the world. They’ve started building one. The accusation was never meant to be true. It was meant to be answered. Because the moment you’re defending yourself against a label, the label has already done its work. And when no answer can acquit you, you were never being accused. You were being sentenced. The presumption of innocence was never a description of how people think. It was a wall built against it. Four centuries putting it up. A decade taking it down. Musk didn’t accept the frame. He answered with facts and let the accusations collapse on contact, then told the person holding the microphone that she was the problem. The weapon only works on people who flinch. He didn’t. And the accusation that came from no one finally had a name on it. Hers.
English
371
1.3K
7K
153.4K
Andy Flynn
Andy Flynn@rkid_andy·
@Foddmann @pureguava10300 Also not an accident. Parents should not leave kids in a position for a child to take the car. Personal responsibility.
English
1
0
0
17
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@tengyanAI @elonmusk Musk is mad because he got kicked out before they turned into a for-profit. He has never held some kind of nobler ideals about AI for the good of humanity. He holds no principles.
English
0
0
0
152
Teng Yan
Teng Yan@tengyanAI·
The beef that explains much of today's AI landscape. @elonmusk: "i'm not a fan of Sam. if you started a nonprofit that was meant to be an open-source AI and turned into into a $800B for-profit closed-source company.. that's my issue" “the reason Anthropic exists is because they didn’t trust Sam Altman. Otherwise they’d still be at OpenAI. everyone I've met at Anthropic so far..no one set off my evil detector." source: The Economist
English
9
5
44
13.6K
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@rkid_andy @pureguava10300 Sorry, I was referring to the 9 y/o driving a car as an accident. Perhaps his parents are to blame, but it was still unintentional.
English
1
0
0
8
Andy Flynn
Andy Flynn@rkid_andy·
@Foddmann @pureguava10300 & there lies the problem in the mentality of your thinking. An accident implies no one is to blame - when 35 people die in a bar fire, there absolutely is someone to blame. Many people, in fact. & calling it an “accident” mitigates how serious it is & how it will happen again.
English
1
0
0
15
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@marksotoges @r0ck3t23 Journalists should not be sycophants. She did the job of a journalist—asked controversial questions.
English
1
0
2
43
Mark
Mark@marksotoges·
@r0ck3t23 Never seen a "journalist" come to an interview with such a vicious and aggressive agenda and not even try to hide it in the least. Not sure why Elon wastes his time with these cretins.
Manilva, Spain 🇪🇸 English
8
0
22
586
Zell
Zell@Zell0022·
@TheEconomist @elonmusk @zannymb She tried so hard to make elon look bad but had no proof of anything she was saying. Real journalism died years ago and now we just have activists in media. How do these people still have jobs while peddling lies
English
8
0
14
1.1K
The Economist
The Economist@TheEconomist·
.@elonmusk says zero people died from DOGE cuts to USAID. The billionaire CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, in his own words, helped feed the policy to the woodchipper last year, when he was the head of America’s Department of Government Efficiency. In an exclusive interview, @zannymb, The Economist’s editor-in-chief, challenges his claims: bit.ly/3RNqFnH
English
3.3K
2.1K
23.7K
2.5M
Elleville
Elleville@GodDivaGirl·
Father, I pray for Tate/Tristan and their attorney Joe. I do not know if they know you Lord GOD, only you know Father. I pray for a hedge of protection around their mind, body, and spirit. I pray the brothers will be given due process, as that is their fundamental right given to everyone in USA who have been charged with a crime. I pray for Divinve justice to intervene. Show forth your Glory, Truth and Power on this alleged rape case Lord GOD, for these brothers are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Dismantle, confuse and eradicate every lie, that includes lies, if committed by the #Media. Your Holy Word cites, “for there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open (Luke 8:17), in Jesus mighty name I pray, amen 🙏
English
20
0
3
464
Reason Bites
Reason Bites@ReasonBites·
@MikeTheNavyGuy1 She came off like an ideology driven left wing lunatic. All judgement and not enough true journalism.
English
8
0
37
3.6K
Deion | SeeReax
Deion | SeeReax@SeeReax·
People yelling about historical accuracy in The Odyssey but have no problem with Jesus being made white in 90% of all of his depictions lmao
English
138
848
8.8K
164.8K
Foddmann
Foddmann@Foddmann·
@JesseOlson This is just a liquidity grab (failed breakdown). It will squeeze next week.
English
0
0
1
27