
Jason Guidone for Senate
326 posts

Jason Guidone for Senate
@ForSenateCTD19









BREAKING: Pennsylvania officials reportedly admitted that for decades, the Department of Motor Vehicles had allowed non-U.S. citizens to register to vote through the state’s ‘motor voter’ system. @TomFitton judicialwatch.org/amici-brief-as…


Who benefits from your public benefits charge? Not you or your neighbors, but rather, Hartford bureaucrats, nonprofit executives, and social justice warriors. While families across Connecticut are struggling this winter to keep the heat on, the monthly public benefits charge is subsidizing childcare costs for career activists. #NonProfitNonsense


Take note, Fairfield Connecticut has Board of Finance and Town Planning and zoning candidates running on the Working Families Party Line. Who is the WFP stumping for? Mamdani. Connecticut, wake up. Socialism is rampant and growing. We need to find common ground - and both Democrats and Republicans should be able to agree on Socialism being bad.

"I think the FBI is going to have a room in the Capitol" House GOP Leader Vincent Candelora details Connecticut's culture of corruption and how a recent FBI investigation into the state budgeting process highlights the absence of accountability in a state mired by one-party rule.

Join us tomorrow Greater Danbury at 6pm 🇺🇸

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord.

Let’s address an uncomfortable truth about how we MUST ensure that Connecticut’s anti-discrimination law on “sexual orientation” unambiguously excludes pedophilia and criminal acts. The statute could be revised with the following clear, explicit language and structure: Example Revision of “Sexual Orientation” Definition > “Sexual orientation” means an individual’s romantic, emotional, or sexual attraction to adults of the same gender, a different gender, or more than one gender. > For the purposes of this section, “sexual orientation” does not include: > - Any attraction involving minors as defined by state and federal law; > - Pedophilia or any sexual attraction to children; > - Any behaviors or expressions that constitute criminal conduct under Connecticut law or federal law, including but not limited to offenses defined in chapters addressing sexual assault, sexual exploitation, and related crimes against children. Supplementary Clause > Nothing in this section shall be construed to protect, legitimize, or provide civil rights or employment protections to individuals on the basis of attraction to minors or on the basis of conduct, behavior, or self-identification that involves criminal activity. Rationale and Legal Effect - Age Restriction: Explicitly states the law refers only to attraction between adults or to adults, sharply excluding attractions involving minors. - Exclusion of Criminality: Clarifies that neither criminal behavior nor attraction that would constitute a crime is protected under the non-discrimination law. - Precedent and Enforcement: Aligns with federal rulings and accepted standards, preventing any future reinterpretation from extending rights to MAPs or individuals involved in illegal conduct. Such language would leave no ambiguity and directly address concerns raised by critics and the public about hypothetically broad interpretations. It would also withstand legal scrutiny and be straightforward for agencies, employers, and courts to enforce. @CTGOP @sampsonforct @CTSenateGOP @ForSenateCTD19 @austinmmonteiro @Bowmanfor54 @CTCentinal


As a father of 3 girls, this sickens me to the core. They should arrest this pedophile and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. @CTCentinal @ct_unite @CTPatriot17 @All_United_ @ForSenateCTD19 @DominicARapini @AnneFM1776 @austinmmonteiro



In my mind, the much more genuine crime in the #Hartford non-profit scandal is not the ostensible burning of cash in a tight little circle of politically-connected individuals, but the continued blind funding of multiple NFPs by the Legislature (all parties) and the Appropriations Committee to the (should-be-abolished) @CTDECD, out to said Non-Profits, with zero accountability or governance. Or the least bit of care, for that matter. And this has gone on for years. Take "GIRLS FOR TECHNOLOGY INC", below. In Fiscal 2023- 40% of grants went for salaries. And even more for "Consulting Fees" For $1.1 Million Dollars!! That is a figure too small even for most banks to accept in trust. The Feds are now doing what the state has refused to do for years. Its about time. (More Tuesdays on the @949newsnowwjjf @LeeElci Show and on "THIRTY WITH TONY" Thursdays at 3 on X and YouTube). @CTDems @CTSenateDems @CTGOP @CTSenateGOP @CTHouseDems @cthousegop @GovNedLamont





