FractalEncrypt ∞/21M

42.9K posts

FractalEncrypt ∞/21M banner
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M

FractalEncrypt ∞/21M

@FractalEncrypt

Cypherpunk Artist infusing software, math, art, tech, and chemistry into biological interfaces. #BitcoinOnly. No Shitcoins. No NFTs. https://t.co/R0dsYMsF02

Miami Beach, FL Katılım Aralık 2017
3.7K Takip Edilen33.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M@FractalEncrypt·
The Bitcoin Full Node Sculpture, A Cypherpunk Chronometer. #5 of 10 was hand delivered yesterday & I wanted to compile a GIGA-THREAD compiling photos, videos, explainers, and podcasts all into one place 👇 Let's go back into time and down the rabbit hole and see #1 -4
English
170
520
2.7K
0
Fully Noded - Dev
Fully Noded - Dev@Fonta1n3·
Imagine being butthurt bc …checks notes… people want to keep Bitcoins use case purely as money. Wild.
English
11
13
123
2.4K
Samson Mow
Samson Mow@Excellion·
It's funny when Bitcoin things fall on my birthday. 😂 SegWit locked in August 8, 2017 BIP110 forks off on August 8, 2026
English
18
11
212
14.7K
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M retweetledi
MADEX
MADEX@spacebull·
whatever you blame controls you
English
3
3
17
568
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M retweetledi
Secure Sovereign 🚀₿🧡
Bitcoin didn't eliminate trust. It redistributed it. The protocol replaced trust in banks with trust in math, distributed computation, and the collective agreement of participants to enforce common rules. That is a genuine achievement. But redistribution is not elimination. The trust went somewhere, and where it went has a surface that can be mapped and manipulated. "The network decides" sounds like a complete answer until you ask what the network is running. The network runs software. Software is written by people. Those people are funded by identifiable institutions and merge authority sits with five people who answer to no one. When you appeal to the network as a neutral arbiter, you are appealing to whoever controls what the network runs. The standard response to this is "anyone can fork it." There are three ways to read that and all three fail. 1) Fork the chain and you move the same development infrastructure, the same informal merge authority, and the same capture vectors to a different set of maintainers. 2) Fork the Core codebase and you inherit 17 years of technical debt, 300,000 lines of monolithic spaghetti code that the incumbent's own developers cannot maintain without shipping bugs that delete user funds. 3) Build a genuine alternative implementation from scratch and you face the third problem: without a formal mathematical specification to validate against, consensus compatibility means reverse-engineering undocumented behavior from Core and staying architecturally dependent on it by definition. Without it, no alternative implementation could prove consensus compatibility independent of Core. If the system were as open as advertised, the spec would already exist. None of this means valid transactions need anyone's approval. They don't. But "pay the fee and get mined" is not the end of the analysis. Bitcoin is a distributed state transition ledger, not a storage layer. Using it as one imposes a permanent cost on every node operator, without compensation, forever. The fee goes to miners. The storage cost goes to nodes. Those are different parties and only one gets paid. The failing informal governance is why that misalignment never gets corrected. The most durable capture is the kind that does not need to be maintained because its subjects maintain it themselves. Sincere people who genuinely believe it repeat it in every governance debate because the social environment of Bitcoin discourse has consistently rewarded that belief and punished the alternative. The mythology does suppression work without requiring anyone to coordinate the suppression. The protocol is permissionless. The people who control what runs on it are not.
The Journey Man@JM_speakss

BIP-110 exposed a hilarious truth: A lot of “Bitcoiners” only believe Bitcoin is permissionless when they personally approve of what people do with it. For years: “Bitcoin is neutral.” “Bitcoin is censorship resistant.” “Bitcoin is digital energy.” “Nobody controls it.” Then someone uses blockspace in a way they dislike and suddenly they become the communist hall monitors of Bitcoin: “BITCOIN IS MONEY ONLY 😡” Oh, so Bitcoin can be anything…just like energy….but only after the Use Case Committee approves it? You’re all a bunch of fckin communists. Bitcoin doesn’t give a single fuck about your religious definition of what it’s “supposed” to be. It has consensus rules. If a transaction follows the rules, pays the fee and gets mined, your feelings about its “purpose” are irrelevant. If Bitcoin is only permissionless until someone does something you hate with it then you never believed in permissionless money. Please fork off, build BSV 2.0 and spend the next decade screaming that your deserted chain is the “real Bitcoin.” The rest of us will let the network decide.

English
2
5
21
1.1K
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M@FractalEncrypt·
@DecrimNat Really interesting question and made me question the concept of CEVs. Obviously they're not "visuals" since eyes are closed, but without question something "visual " occurs. I suppose the come from the same place as dreams...
English
0
0
0
43
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M retweetledi
Just-B
Just-B@cryptbdango·
Got my 5/21 @TimechainArtMag (Bitcoin Art Magazine) Genesis hard cover the other week and I believe this is going to be such a sought out #BTC collectible that I am not even going to break the seal on any of it. @asanoha_gold killed it on all levels on top of promoting #BTC art and artist. Like all great collections in the world, artwork is at the top of their collections and continues to age like fine wine. (True investments) I have nothing but the highest respect for what was accomplished here and am a #BTC art collector myself as well as being a #BTC artist. If you were one of the smart 21 people who invested in this hard cover I have nothing but respect 🫡
Just-B tweet media
English
6
4
14
606
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M@FractalEncrypt·
@design_sats @Fonta1n3 Peter Todd just said that bitcoin is not purely money, but its also for storing lots of data - in the BTC Prague talk released today. So the "purely money" thing isnt as cut and dry as you may imagine. Send the 10k sats please.
English
2
0
3
44
Andrej designSats
Andrej designSats@design_sats·
@Fonta1n3 10k sats if you can find me any reputable bitcoiner who said he is against using Bitcoin as money. You can't. Cos it's a complete strawman
English
2
0
4
68
Panic Setlists
Panic Setlists@PanicSetlists·
>Conrad The Caterpillar
English
2
0
14
1.2K
Alex Moura 🏴‍☠️
@turnJBuppp cheated! tricking out my song list w/ new features and these were the most likely tunes based on whatever logic i fed it.
Alex Moura 🏴‍☠️ tweet media
English
1
0
1
63
TourWrangler
TourWrangler@TourWrangler·
You can now mute artists on TourWrangler! Users can now customize what artists appear on TourWrangler when signed in. Muted artists won’t appear on your homepage, setlist page, or video pages.
English
4
0
9
1.5K