Franco_Da_Zebra

1.4K posts

Franco_Da_Zebra banner
Franco_Da_Zebra

Franco_Da_Zebra

@Franco_Da_Zebra

Katılım Aralık 2024
40 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
By far the largest welfare scam is military disability. Your allergies aren’t because of jet fuel, you’re just a scam artist
Franco_Da_Zebra tweet media
English
0
1
1
374
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@BitClops @marcjoffe Some smaller ones are. But Florida is unquestionably the best run state in the country right now Texas is cheaper, but billionaires down care about the 20% cheaper property value
English
0
0
2
35
Marc Joffe
Marc Joffe@marcjoffe·
CA and WA are solving wealth and income inequality. By driving out billionaires, they are driving down their gini coefficients. So if you live on the West Coast, you should be feeling better now.
Marc Joffe tweet media
English
202
403
3.6K
118.1K
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@terrakei07 It’s the best land in the world, but liberals have turned it into a one part state hell hole
English
0
0
0
2
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@realtonysm1th I think either: 1) He has on good intelligence that China is going to attack the US 2) He is shifting the window like crazy intentionally… believing that democrats overstepping during the next 2 years would put the republicans ahead in 28
English
1
0
0
809
Tony
Tony@realtonysm1th·
Maybe I’m crazy, but is Trump acting really bizarre? Like he normally has a good read on voters, even if what he says is nonsense. He nailed it in 2024; he knew exactly what to say and to avoid mention of all these wild new shenanigans he’s suddenly into. What is this strategy?
Polymarket@Polymarket

BREAKING: Trump is reportedly planning to frame the Republican Party’s midterm message around funding for a “massive defense buildup” in hopes of energizing voters.

English
606
134
5.4K
631.5K
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@EiratheIntern The domicile argument is weak. There are two serious arguments against the current system. “Jurisdiction” can be read as: 1. Political allegiance, not mere presence, excluding unlawful entrants (stronger) 2. Descriptive at ratification, not a universal rule (weaker)
English
0
0
1
37
✝️🇺🇸 The Intern 🌐🔆
She's literally right in this argument. I am subject to the local jurisdiction of wherever I travel, regardless of citizenship. And that confers certain obligations ergo allegiance as understood by the administration's argument. Domicile status doesn't affect any of that!
End Wokeness@EndWokeness

Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance." Her case for birthright citizenship:

English
170
197
3.4K
145K
Stock Talk
Stock Talk@stocktalkweekly·
*CHINA PRESIDENT XI WILL MEET WITH EUROPEAN LEADERS INCLUDING FRANCE PRESIDENT, SPAIN PM, AND EU PRESIDENT IN VIETNAM IN THE COMING WEEKS AMID RISING GLOBAL TRADE TENSIONS OVER U.S. TARIFFS -- EUROPE SEEKING GREATER INTIMACY WITH CHINA & SOUTHEAST ASIA TO OFFSET U.S. RELIANCE
English
585
2.6K
34.3K
6.3M
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
If you watch the full Joe Rogan x Theo Von podcast from today you can cut the tension with a knife. Theo will say something "left coded" and Joe will immediately take the opposite end of the stance, and challenge him over and over until Theo basically says "What are you doing?"
English
479
776
32.7K
2.4M
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@XJaeMarie @helloitsrez @AutismCapital @ThePenOfQuotes No. He’s trying to adopt the stance of the public, but he’s too dumb to filter out bad information or think things through logically. That’s toxic empathy. That’s why he has completely incoherent views, and often antithetical views.
English
0
0
0
80
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@AutismCapital @ThePenOfQuotes He’s extremely stupid. And he knows it so he’s very insecure about that fact. This leads to him leaning too far into the schitzo-leftist stuff, because he’s too dumb to filter out the truth from the false information. It’s very unfortunate
English
0
0
1
785
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
@ThePenOfQuotes Theo genuinely wants to find neutral equilibrium and be an everyman with his guests. He's trying to find right now where the most safe opinion to be is. He flows with changing opinions but his goal is to find harmony. He means no ill intent. He's sensitive but in the public eye.
English
49
14
2.5K
309.9K
RedWave Press
RedWave Press@RedWavePress·
NASA pilot Victor Glover CLAPS back after being asked what it means to be the first black man to visit the moon: “It’s the story of humanity, not black history, not women’s history, but that it becomes human history.” “I also HOPE we are pushing the other direction that one day we don’t have to talk about these first. That one day, this is just—and listen to this—that this is the human history.”
English
1.4K
5.4K
43.3K
2.1M
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@yarbatman I wouldn’t say Trump’s position is irrational… it’s entirely logical because the longer it goes on, the more the US benefits relatively to the rest of the world. Trump basically set a trap of heads I win, tails you lose. The only way for Iran to “win” here is bending the knee
English
0
0
3
780
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj
Iranian leaders have achieved operational success in externalizing the costs of this war. But their *strategy* still failed because they did not anticipate three things. First, that U.S. allies, including the Gulf states that have so lavishly fetted Trump, would have essentially no influence over the decisions he makes. Second, that neither the U.S. president nor his cabinet would care about unprecedented disruptions in the global economy and would make it known publicly that they don’t care. Third, that the U.S. president could express glee about the prospect of endless escalation and the commission of war crimes and not a single part of the famous American system of checks and balances would block him from intensifying this idiotic, ruinous war. In the face of Israeli and American aggression, Iran chose a perfectly rational, if risky, strategy. They managed to make it work operationally. But Trump’s pursuit of this war is fundamentally irrational. He is a mad king. Rex interregnum.
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj tweet media
English
330
574
3.1K
916.9K
based bombshell
based bombshell@badboujeebabee·
@TheInsiderPaper Learn to speak Chinese or Russian is my recommendation to Europe. Becasue there ain’t no damn way American men or women are fighting to save you fuks ever again.
English
8
1
136
1.9K
Insider Paper
Insider Paper@TheInsiderPaper·
JUST IN - Austria says refused US requests to overfly its territory
English
71
206
1.2K
189K
Franco_Da_Zebra
Franco_Da_Zebra@Franco_Da_Zebra·
@BahlestKimmie @astraiaintel Israel and the USA, hence “Death to Israel, Death to America” Acting as if America does not have the right to attack a country they have been in a proxy war with for decades when they start making nuclear weapons is hilariously stupid
English
3
0
6
135
Michael Jones
Michael Jones@BahlestKimmie·
@astraiaintel Which country has Iran threatened with nuclear destruction. Be specific.
English
3
0
0
247
Overton
Overton@overton_news·
🚨 Stephen A. Smith dropped a SURPRISING take on birthright citizenship. “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court...to attend oral arguments...I’m here to tell you ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” Smith then asked his audience the uncomfortable question about birthright citizenship: “Is it right?” SMITH: “The issue that I wanted to get into is birthright citizenship by simply asking this question.” “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court today...to hear their thoughts, their questions, their inquiry, their opinions on birthright citizenship in the United States of America.” “How’d you feel about that?” “I’m here to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” “He campaigned on this issue.” “He’s been accused of not paying attention to stuff that’s happening on our home soil.” “You want to do something politically expedient to your benefit, if you’re President Donald Trump, this is the fight you fight, because millions of Americans flow with him on this issue.” “And the reason why it’s an issue that’s important to tackle is because remember what the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution states.” “Remember what it states!” “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. “Meaning if you are born on U.S. soil, you are a U.S. citizen automatically. Automatically!” “Here’s the part that we have to ask ourselves, and this is where the conversation gets uncomfortable, do you believe in birthright citizenship as an American citizen?” “Do you believe that somebody that crosses our borders illegally, to give birth on American soil, that their children, their newborn should automatically be an American citizen?” “According to the United States Constitution, there is no argument there.” “What I’m asking you is, is it right?” “Should it happen?”
English
409
439
2.8K
519.3K
Corn My Cob
Corn My Cob@DoorMyKnob·
@asbestosman8 We need to just keep Mike Renner on the football treadmill because everything else about this guy is yikes
English
2
0
49
2.7K
Basil🧡
Basil🧡@LinkofSunshine·
People do not remember how bad it was before the ACA. If you had cancer while uninsured, you just couldn’t get insurance ever now
English
53
46
2.5K
57.6K
Basil🧡
Basil🧡@LinkofSunshine·
Dems had a trifecta for like 41 days and immediately gave tens of millions of Americans healthcare
English
445
1.6K
29.6K
1.2M
Leading Report
Leading Report@LeadingReport·
BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Amy Coney Barrett now seems skeptical of striking down birthright citizenship for illegal migrants. “What if you don’t know who the parents are?”
English
725
270
5.9K
1.1M
Chuks Chukwuemeka 📈
Chuks Chukwuemeka 📈@Chuksforreal·
That’s the question that unravels the whole argument. Barrett wasn’t being rhetorical. She was identifying a practical impossibility. How do you build a citizenship system around information you may never have? The policy sounds clean in a tweet. It falls apart in a courtroom. That’s why the Constitution is hard to change. It’s supposed to be.
English
130
0
36
8.5K