Angelia Frankum

Feeling extra spicy today. 🌶️🇺🇸 🌶️🇺🇸🌶️🇺🇸🌶️🇺🇸🌶️🇺🇸 That European betrayal has been stewing… and now it’s straight-up burning. You pathetic cuckold turkeys f*cked with the wrong Veteran. I loathe every last one of you spineless a**holes who play games with American Servicemembers and their mission. You don’t get to freeload off our blood and then deny us the bases our own troops are stationed on. Bring it, you globalist clowns. We’re done carrying your dead weight. I got your six @POTUS and @SecWar!

@BravesFan30281 @GAFollowers Thanks for sharing @BravesFan30281! I’m extremely nitpicky about wording — for good reason. Politicians too often use verbal jiu-jitsu and half-truths to disenfranchise voters.

@FrankumAngelia @GAFollowers I'm a Republican, but I voted in the Democrat primary so I could vote for Geoff Duncan.

Georgia just shattered its ALL-TIME early voting record for a primary election and Democrats are outperforming Republicans by 15 POINTS statewide. 🔵 580,000 Democratic ballots 🔴 430,000 Republican ballots Over 1 MILLION Georgians voted early. Election Day is Tuesday.

True, @HanadaMarie. Many Independents in Georgia could easily choose a Democratic primary ballot over a Republican one. That brings me back to my second question: How does @GAFollowers know the Democrats are truly “outpacing” the Republicans? Since Georgia doesn’t register voters by party and anyone can vote in either primary, wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there were simply more Democratic primary ballots cast than Republican ones?

Thanks @SpookyMaps — it has been awhile since registering! That still doesn’t fully answer my question, though. The Democrat Party never sends me any campaign mail, while the Republicans flood my mailbox. Since Georgia doesn’t register voters by party, how exactly do the parties know my affiliation? I’ve been an Independent most of my adult life and only started voting hard right in the last 10 years. Genuinely curious how they track that.

@FrankumAngelia @GAFollowers We dont register by party in Georgia, so that’s why we’re asked

States handle elections day-to-day — that’s true. The Constitution gives primary authority to the states under Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 (the Elections Clause): “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…” But here’s the part politicians and their media allies love to conveniently forget: the very next words say “but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations.” Congress has broad oversight and can step in with federal laws, funding conditions, or enforcement mechanisms. The executive branch (DOJ and FBI) can investigate and prosecute violations of federal election laws — they just don’t run the elections themselves. Typical. They quote half the Constitution and hope no one reads the rest — kind of like their greatest hits, the “Fine People Hoax.” Partial truths, selective outrage, and narrative protection. The full picture matters. For context, Congress has used this power in laws like the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), the Voting Rights Act, and other statutes that set national standards on voting machines, voter rolls, and election integrity. Federalism isn’t a one-way street.

I genuinely try to engage in open-minded discussions with those I disagree with — not to “win,” but to understand their thinking. Yet lately, I’ve been called ignorant for believing the “liar in the White House,” labeled a flat-earther, and dismissed as too stupid to grasp basic facts. It’s ridiculous. I consistently support my views with articles, videos, studies, and data, only to be met with vile insults instead of real debate. America desperately needs to move past this childish, toxic behavior. Real debate educates us and produces better leaders. The mainstream media won’t do it for us — they peddle Democrat talking points while public trust collapses: Gallup pegged overall media trust at just 28% in 2025, with Republicans at a shocking 8%. It’s time Americans help each other cut through the noise and demand the truth. Enough with the insults — let’s debate with evidence.

Such a sad reality: these terrorist thugs—yes, terrorist thugs—have been given the green light by the Democrat Party and their mainstream media allies for so long that they now feel emboldened enough to escalate "protests" into assassination attempts without hesitation. Thanks, @TheDemocrats, for turning the United States into a warzone where any voice that dares challenge your message or agenda is silenced. You Democrats created this atmosphere—no one else.

My event at University of Washington with TPUSA tomorrow has been postponed, here's why...

Thanks, @FriedrichMerz! Brilliant move. While you're at it, why not rally the rest of Europe to follow suit? Heck, don't stop there—head on over to South America and Asia too. Spread the gospel. I'm personally tired of the economic messes, open-border experiments, and radical-left resurgence that Germany and its European allies keep cooking up, only to ship the consequences off to America. We don't need your problems. Maybe focus on fixing your own house before criticizing everyone else's.

Germany’s Chancellor @_FriedrichMerz has become the European President of the TDS Society. When he sat with Donald Trump at the White House, however, he was completely soft and complimentary. Germans have a leader who has no strategy - and is completely controlled by the German woke media. An economic plan brought to you by Stern Magazine. Merz now: “I'm a great admirer of the US, however, my admiration is not growing these days. I wouldn't advise my own children to go to the US for education or work because of the climate in society there."

I respect Secretary Rubio for his honesty and willingness to speak plainly on this issue. As a former strong supporter of NATO during his time in the Senate, his current calls to re-examine the alliance’s value to America carry real weight. As a U.S. veteran and military spouse who lived on European bases, I’ve seen firsthand how this arrangement works. For decades, many NATO allies treated the U.S. as their primary security blanket—benefiting enormously from American troop presence, bases, and funding—while chronically underinvesting in their own defense. Even as all allies finally met the 2% GDP target in 2025 for the first time, the U.S. has long shouldered a disproportionate share of the burden. (politico.eu/article/nato-c…) Their lackluster commitment became crystal clear in the recent operations aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons or material. Allies like Spain outright denied the U.S. access to key bases such as Naval Station Rota and Morón Air Base. Others, including Italy and France, imposed restrictions on airspace and operations. This isn’t partnership—it’s freeloaders expecting America to defend shared interests while refusing even basic logistical support. These acts of disloyalty have solidified my view: it’s time to seriously consider leaving NATO or fundamentally restructuring it. The alliance should not be a one-way street where the U.S. provides the muscle and Europe reaps the benefits without reciprocity.

SECRETARY RUBIO: One of the reasons I supported NATO is because it gave us basing rights in Europe. So when NATO partners like Spain deny us use of these bases, the primary reason for why NATO is good for America, then what is the purpose of the alliance?

Because Fresno City College and Fresno State are institutions for adults, not minors, they would be the appropriate venues for these events. Why not ask those colleges to open their library doors to the adult performers you represent? Public libraries exist for children and families—not as venues for adults with no children of their own to "express their sexuality" in front of kids. This is not harmless entertainment. It is a grotesque perversion for grown adults to demand access to public spaces filled with children in order to display sexualized performances and adult-themed content. Children cannot consent to being exposed to this, and parents have every right to expect public libraries to remain safe, age-appropriate environments free from grooming and sexual exploitation disguised as "inclusion" or "storytime.

BREAKING: The Fresno County Board of Supervisors voted to BLOCK Pride month activities at public libraries. This comes after a drag queen teacher showed up to the meeting demanding that libraries be kept as LGBTQ "safe spaces" MASSIVE WIN Taxpayer-funded libraries should not be a space for grooming kids!

When I first saw the clip, I was irritated by Congressman Raskin’s nonstop interruptions. Then I rewatched it and just started laughing. The @HouseDemocrats are apparently so terrified of religion that they can’t even let a 16-year-old answer a question they asked without trying to shout him down like he’s committing a hate crime by opening his mouth. Hey Democrats, if your sophisticated, anti-religion worldview is really that compelling and popular, why the desperate need to bully a teenager into silence every other word? Seems like your “tolerant” position is a tad disingenuous when you’re this scared of letting someone respond. Elite fragility, thy name is @TheDemocrats.

Jamie Raskin just got HUMILIATED by a 16-year-old student… you have to see this 🔥 rumble.com/v79t3mi-dem-ja…

@WarlordDilley Best D*mn President Ever!

In the last month Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly embraced their new Jihadi audience, Swallwell is facing multiple accusers and resigned in shame, Thomas Massie accusers are coming forward, and Marjorie Traitor Greene skipped the country. The Trump Curse is alive and well!

Democrat politicians have mastered feeding their base a tailored narrative. Deflection, retconning, and revisionist history fill their messaging toolbox. Backed by loyal media allies, they’ve indoctrinated much of their base beyond reason. With socialism surging on the left and this rhetoric machine cemented in place, getting America back on track feels almost impossible.

Mayorkas says that he disagreed with Biden admin immigration policy — and suggests that border security should’ve been tightened sooner: “There were areas of disagreement within immigration policy…but I voiced my views." "I was very pleased that in June of 2024, we took executive action that I thought made reforms that were sensible." This is the same guy repeatedly assured the country that the border was secure. Now he wants a history rewrite.

Maybe we should step away from focusing on the 'person' and instead examine their policies. Too many people are trapped in idol fixation, denying the realities of those they admire—often based primarily on looks or media praise. This blinds them to the very change they claim to want. Meanwhile, those who could actually deliver the change you desire are demonized, if not outright ignored, by the same media that tells you who to idolize.

Liar? I am not the one declaring “it was nothing.” You dismissed the articles I shared documenting serious election issues—dead people voting, non-citizens voting, ballots counted without proper verification, and more—that are still being investigated in multiple states. Dismissing one narrow category of fraud doesn’t mean the rest was nothing. Until we thoroughly investigate, no one truly knows the full extent of the problems. Audits and reforms protect election integrity for all Americans, Democrats included. Influential Democrats have raised similar concerns: James Carville long claimed Bush didn’t legitimately win Florida in 2000, and Stacey Abrams still insists she won her Georgia gubernatorial races. Questioning results and pushing for better safeguards isn’t partisan — it builds trust in the system for everyone. I’m not pushing any leader’s narrative. I just want us to examine the evidence and improve the process. If you’re fine with the status quo and have no interest in strengthening confidence in our elections, that’s your choice. But the concerns are real and deserve honest discussion.

@FrankumAngelia @VolgareT @FOX5Atlanta @POTUS Okay. Everything you have talked about, I showed it was nothing. I'm not deflecting, but showing that your concerns stem from a liar in the White House, and you are eating it up. As I said, you are bringing the same information as a flat Earther.

Fulton County election officials filed a motion Monday to quash a federal grand jury subpoena seeking the personal information of thousands of staff and volunteers who served during the November 2020 General Election. fox5atlanta.com/news/fulton-mo…

Do you find it hilarious that these “educated elitists” would probably be shocked to learn that in places like NE Georgia, it’s often Republicans who are more focused on conserving nature? We’re the ones out camping, hunting, fishing, and actively cultivating the land we live on. Sure, there are some Democrats who enjoy nature too—but Democrat leaders are famous for retconning their party’s ugly history, whether it is climate change or race. They constantly rewrite the past on slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow while lecturing everyone else about “systemic racism.” The point is, Democrat leaders tend to deflect and change history to further their political power. At the end of the day, real climate care and conservation come from those who actually live on the land and steward it daily—not from disconnected elitists pushing political agendas.

@FrankumAngelia @Timcast @Matthuber78 No, it assumes that we in the working class don't give a fuck about an issue we hardly even contribute to, and are tired of being punished while the people pushing the bullshit fly on private jets. It's not that we're ignorant or incapable. It's because we know it's a racket

We need to focus getting oil to Cuba right?

Agreed. I'm tired of these elitist "experts" with worthless, unearned degrees lecturing everyday Americans like we're idiots. They hide behind credentials from institutions that prioritize ideology over real competence, yet their track record speaks for itself. It's time we reject blind deference to these so-called professionals and judge them strictly by results—because most of them clearly aren't.

@FrankumAngelia @Timcast @Matthuber78 “an issue mainly important to their educated/affluent base” is disgusting and deeply condescending - i took it more like a jab at the brainwashed "educated/affluent" as in they are morons for believing the op is real

Says the guy who laser-focuses on just one narrow slice of election issues—in-person impersonation fraud, cited at roughly 0.0003% to 0.0025%—while dismissing broader concerns about election integrity as "nonsense." Investigating vulnerabilities to improve our elections isn't denialism; it's basic due diligence. You seem fine accepting the word of the Biden Administration—the one with the largest downward BLS jobs revisions on record—as if they'd never mislead the public. Yet here we are: the Bureau of Labor Statistics revised job growth down by 911,000 for the 12 months ending March 2025, the biggest preliminary benchmark revision since at least 2000. Initial reports painted a much rosier picture that didn't hold up against better data. (npr.org/2025/09/09/nx-…) Or the persistent "fine people" narrative pushed on Trump regarding Charlottesville. The full context shows he explicitly condemned neo-Nazis and white supremacists, saying they should be "condemned totally"—a point even some left-leaning fact-checkers have acknowledged as misrepresented. Your selective framing feels like deflection: ignoring legitimate problems (mail-in/absentee vulnerabilities, registration issues, non-citizen voting concerns documented in places like the Heritage Foundation database) while clutching irrelevant strawmen I never raised. Wanting secure, transparent elections for everyone isn't partisan—it's essential. Pretending the only fraud that exists is the rarest subtype, or that official numbers from any administration are infallible, is the real nonsense.

@FrankumAngelia @VolgareT @FOX5Atlanta @POTUS You seem to think I need to expand my mind by digging into the nonsense you are posting. I wouldn't if it was flat Earth nonsense, we failed a Moon landing nonsense... Nonsense shouldn't even be acknowledged

Many early, vocal supporters of transgender adults are now recoiling. What began as sympathy for adults who felt trapped in the “wrong body” has morphed into demands that they also endorse the medical transition of minors—including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries that sterilize and permanently alter healthy young bodies. They’re being asked to accept secret social transitions at school without parental knowledge, explicit gender and sexuality lessons given to children as young as five, and curricula that teach kids how to engage in various sex acts—all while bypassing parents entirely. The backlash is growing because the evidence is mounting: 1. The Cass Review in the UK found the evidence for puberty blockers and youth medical transitions to be remarkably weak, leading Britain to sharply restrict these interventions. 2. Sweden, Finland, Norway, and other European countries have followed suit, rolling back the “affirmative care” model after reviewing the data. 3. Referrals to gender clinics have exploded—especially among adolescent girls—with many cases tied to rapid-onset gender dysphoria, social contagion, autism, trauma, and mental health comorbidities rather than lifelong dysphoria. 4. Detransitioners are increasingly speaking out about irreversible harm, lost fertility, and regret. A growing number of original supporters now see the truth: this movement was never primarily about compassionate care for distressed adults. It has become an aggressive push to sexualize and medicalize children, often at the direct expense of parental rights and child safeguarding. Many are rightly saying: enough. Yet far too many of those initial supporters harbor private regrets but are too proud—or too invested—to publicly admit how badly they got it wrong.

Would you say something? HTBITY

I shared articles, statistics, and videos. You responded by claiming fraud cases are “severely slim” while dismissing concerns—yet your own words reveal you skimmed right past my articles and videos showing possible fraud and outright fraud. That alone proves this isn’t a serious or honest debate on your part. If you were genuinely interested in the truth, you’d engage with the evidence instead of skimming it. I appreciate the study you shared, but you still missed my central point: one fraudulent vote cancels out one legal vote. No one claims zero fraud is realistic. But pretending it’s insignificant and refusing to investigate is far worse. The FBI is actively searching for fraud in Georgia and elsewhere for a reason. Every day brings another drip of reports—illegal immigrants voting, dead people casting ballots, individuals voting multiple times. Until we properly clean and vet voter rolls and thoroughly investigate all the ways our elections are being corrupted, trust will never be restored. Both sides will remain suspicious, and our republic will continue to erode. We don’t need perfection. We need honesty and basic due diligence. Anything less is unacceptable.

@FrankumAngelia @VolgareT @FOX5Atlanta @POTUS There will never be a zero fraud election. The fraud cases are severely slim, but your leader is making claims that it's so frequent that you don't care to look. I can skim your words and see that you don't look at facts. You have the proof, but you claim I'm disingenuous