Sasha

@novaramedia “Hey Siri, show me where the TERFs live on TERF Island” Siri:

@adidas using a black transwoman to promote the new Scottish football shirt is top tier trolling!

@dilanesper He would be a he though, and you would be wrong.

If I do a thread about a trans woman and call her "her", and you come in my thread and "correct" me and say "you mean him", I'm probably going to block you. Beyond expressing prejudice, you are being immature and uninteresting. It adds nothing to go into threads and say that.

@colonelhogans They never played in to anyone’s hands, they just showed everyone who they actually are. And finally, people will believe them. Islam and its low IQ, violent misogynist worshipers should have no place in Australia.

Congratulations to the Muslims in Lakemba who forced the PM to leave the mosque. You just played right into Pauline Hanson, Angus Taylor, the RW media and every racist and Islamaphobes hands! You really and truly fucked it up! He went there in good faith. You spat on him and the racists are cheering! YOU HAVE LOST MY SUPPORT!

@ZackPolanski What “community” are you talking about here?

"It’s particularly horrendous to me when you have someone from within our own community who demonises a minority group. I don’t know what’s going on in Wes Streeting’s head, but what I do know is it’s terrifying for trans people,” he said. attitude.co.uk/news/zack-pola…

@millymcewen @RedTory2016 @HarrietHarman PIE might have “disbanded” but some of the men are still out here today open.substack.com/pub/genevieveg…

@RedTory2016 @HarrietHarman Stop banging on about PIE. It was 50 years ago. It disbanded in 1984.

What a ridiculous post. Comment on what she says and does. She can wear whatever she likes!!

@BlackIntifada @iiwasinthee212 Because they were colonised by Muslims. The low IQ in these replies should be shocking. But of course, it’s isn’t.

@iiwasinthee212 Black Americans were Muslims before we became Christians

No its fucking not. Christ is an integral part of Black American Culture. We dont like Muslims or Islam at all.

Terfs would have you believe that they are not the villains here, but it's obvious who is trying to rid trans people from view. Social stigmatization, lack of access to care, no support can all drive someone to give up. No one should be denied being their authentic selves.

@Srirachaboi69 @TinaMalone23 The number one killer of mem is men. Too weak and far too selfish to think of anyone but themselves. They happily leave their wives and kids in the shit and take the easy way out simply because theyre “sad”. The women who mourn these men do it out of love but they will move on.

@TinaMalone23 Everyone apologizing to this women are failing to realized that she, as his wife, was the closest person to him and didn’t stop him. The were signs. And they were ignored. The #1 killer of men is the women closest to them. Just for them to post for sympathy afterwards.

Two years ago today the love of my life,my hubby made scrambled eggs for flame,kissed me,left our home and at 3am took his own life… the pain never goes

This is great fun. How good is your colour perception? What are the finest shades you can distinguish? Apparently I'm a bit special. What's My JND? 0.0047 Can you beat it? keithcirkel.co.uk/whats-my-jnd/?…

@PaulEmbery @Aromatica365 That’s nothing to do with insulting the country, it’s squarely aimed at Starmer and I would I would imagine most on the right in Britain will agree with him. Starmer has done nothing but insult the British - from the riots last year to the shameful display of Islamists last week

What an insult to our country by this increasingly unhinged narcissist. I suspect most British people - even those who loathe Starmer - will find this statement extremely disrespectful. As I have said previously, the populist Right in Britain is making a big mistake by hitching its wagons to Trump and his unpopular war.

@WingsScotland @spidercatnz For the brave… reddit.com/r/salmacian/s/…

@spidercatnz Not quite 😳

Oh readers, you’ve GOT to see this one. I promise you, it gets better with every line.

This might blow your mind, but In the real world everyone calls and treats me as a woman because I am one. 🏳️‍⚧️

@TONE1923 @AaronBastani Oh well if that’s what’s the opinion polls say then Tony Moobs must be correct

@FromTipToToeXX @AaronBastani Opinion polls show the majority of the British public against Dementia Don's Epstein War. So there is that.

The right wing media is completely at odds with the British public on this one. As are Reform and the Tories. Reform, I suspect, reflect their voters. Which is their job. But basically everyone else disagrees.

@AaronBastani @martinplaut Yes you’re right Arron, better they hang from cranes than become refugees.

@martinplaut Oh no, so now we should cheer on the millions of people that become refugees I guess.

Anyone sympathising with Iran's brutal regime should remember how they treat gay men

@campbellclaret Epstein was wildly popular with your friends too, wasn’t he?

The right wing rags and the plastic patriots are in for a surprise when they learn that right now Trump is about as popular as Epstein

@pmosligo @PeterTatchell What’s good for the goose and all that.

@PeterTatchell So it’s ok to murder people if you don’t agree with their views?

The clerical fascist dictator of Iran is dead. Iranians rejoice! Ayatollah Khamenei authorised the massacre of around 30,000 democracy protesters in January He was a racist, misogynist, antisemite & homophobe He crushed workers rights & trade unions bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

@gllnkk @DXW_KC @Keir_Starmer “I’m not a lawyer but…” Come off it.

@DXW_KC Your argument has been debunked. @Keir_Starmer and as right to refuse the use of U.S bases for Trump’s illegal war. x.com/gregbagwell/st…

I disagree with Lord Hermer KC, the Attorney General. I don’t accept that international law requires our Prime Minister to deliver a pusillanimous statement setting out the UK’s position whose first point is “We did not participate”. I’ve set out the gist of my approach below. ⬇️   The Prime Minister has refused publicly to support the US and Israel strikes, and also refuses to allow the US to use UK bases, because of international law advice he has reportedly received from Lord Hermer.   International law ought to provide a mechanism to restrain and, if necessary, end despotic and tyrannical regimes such as that in Iran. If the doctrines of international law prove unable to restrain Iranian terrorism and mass murder, and tie the hands of democracies while forcing them to stand and watch Iranian atrocities, international law will have failed. It will have become a fundamentally immoral system of law, and one which is worse than worthless in the modern world.   To be clear: I don’t believe that it is. I think international law is important, and both can and should provide a just legal order. I do, however, have serious questions as to the moral attitudes of some of its expositors; too many international lawyers serenely promote an analysis which ultimately protects tyrants.   Seven points, and some questions:   1 The inherent right to use force in the face of an imminent attack from a hostile nation which is responsible for a pattern of hostile actions exists for good reason: a country cannot be expected to remain idle and just wait for the next attack.   2 Iran has repeatedly threatened to attack the UK’s bases and personnel. Those threats come in the context of persistent Iranian attempts to launch attacks on UK soil, too; the Director General of MI5 has stated, and the PM confirmed last night, that the UK has responded to tens of Iranian-backed plots, presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents. There is also a constant barrage of cyberattacks; while not all cyberattacks are armed attacks in sense of Article 51 of the UN Charter, some may be, and all confirm not just hostile intent but action pursuant to such intent.   3 The UK’s long-standing allies, the US and Israel, were right to consider that they faced further attacks prior to their recent military action, given that (i) Iran has previously attacked both states directly and also through its many proxies; (ii) Iran has repeatedly stated its intent to destroy Israel; (iii) Iran was assessed to be on the brink of acquiring a nuclear capability with uranium enrichment at 60% (which can only be for military use); and (iv) Iran already possessed – as demonstrated by its recent attacks – a sophisticated and effective long-range delivery capability which Israel cannot fully neutralise with defensive weapons.   4 The acquisition of a nuclear capability by Iran represents a genocidal risk for Israel and its people. Iran’s repeatedly stated aim is to wipe the State of Israel, and its inhabitants, off the face of the earth. The slogan of the proxies through which Iran has often attacked Israel is: “God is greater, death to America, death to Israel, curse to the Jews, victory to Islam”. In these circumstances, whether they are characterised as part of an ongoing armed conflict with Iran or as a new use of force based on self-defence, Israel’s actions are justifiable.   5 The UK (and also the US) is permitted under international law to use force to aid another state which is acting in self-defence. Moreover, the UK is under an obligation in international law is to prevent genocide, not just to stop it: stopping an on-going genocide is required, but it necessarily means that action was taken too late. 1/2

@CallherVic @billypilgrim333 @MatthewStadlen @RupertLowe10 What’s an aboriginal?

@billypilgrim333 @MatthewStadlen @RupertLowe10 You mean Aboriginial ?

If I moved to Japan, and lived in Japan for decades, speaking the language, integrating into society, contributing to the economy. Would I be ethnically Japanese? No. No I would not. I would never pretend to be. Nor would that apply to India, Thailand, Mexico, Denmark or anywhere else. So why is England different? Of course there is an English ethnicity. I am entirely bemused by how so many argue against that. It’s just a fact. Politicians who say otherwise are cowards. This is painfully obvious. Restore Britain’s position is clear. English ethnicity exists - it’s the only sodding data point that the Government collects on anything. Of course someone who is not of that ethnicity can be British, obviously. But it equally does not mean that the English ethnicity is imaginary. Those two things can be true at the same time. I got in trouble years ago for suggesting that the footballer Paul Pogba was French, but not ethnically French. It’s insanity. That is just a factual position. Common sense, clearly. Separately, Restore Britain has said from the very start - owning a British passport does not make you British. We have seen how lazily those documents have been frittered away. Holding that piece of paper does not automatically make you British, we are very clear on that. Is the Egyptian lunatic Alaa Abd El-Fattah British? He has a passport. Restore Britain says NO. No, he is not and he should be stripped of that paper and deported. Being British encompasses so much more than that, it means so much more than that. It is not simply a piece of paper. It is culture, shared beliefs, patriotism, language, a common understanding of what is right and wrong. That has nothing to do with ethnicity, obviously. But for even daring to suggest that English ethnicity exists I’ll be roundly attacked. It is just a fact. Every other country in the world manages to acknowledge ethnicities exist without descending into hysteria. England should be able to do the same.

@FondOfBeetles @RupertLowe10 I’m English and I live in Australia where I’ve gained Australian citizenship. I’m still English. My Australian citizenship can be revoked and I can be deported if I was to commit a serious enough crime. Dual citizenship isn’t a guarantee of residency.

@RupertLowe10 My mother is not British but holds a British passport. You are deporting a 77yo woman?