GPCamper92
556 posts
GPCamper92 retweetledi
Jewish propaganda is simple to understand. Patriotism and nationalism are bad. That is why they created a White and blonde character named “homelander” to humiliate and emasculate. White men who are territorial are a threat to jewish supremacy.
★@POPin4k
i'm sorry but homelander trying to fly without his power had me laughing so bad lmao 😭 #theboys
English
@B1TuckerCarlson @JakeLang You want him in jail because you’re a scared little bitch.
English
🚨 BREAKING:
We are OUTSIDE Chud the Builder’s COURTHOUSE in Clarksville Tennessee!!! 😲
Courtroom is PACKED TO THE GILLS with tons of CHUD SUPPORTERS!!! 🇺🇸
His BOND has been set at an exorbitant $1.25 MILLION DOLLARS for SELF DEFENSE!!!!
TWO TIERED JUSTICE!! 😡
FREE CHUD
English
@kaleb_davis19 @WakeUpJacob Dangerous areas? You mean area with concentrated amounts of niggers?
English
@WakeUpJacob Dude what is your problem. You won’t say that word in public in dangerous areas…. Keep typing in your basement
English
English
@SithLordGroyper @NotMrsStan He’s trying to divert White rage away from jews towards muslims.
English
Jake Lang is a Jewish operative whose sole purpose is to provoke Americans into fighting Israel’s wars in the Middle East.
He needs to go back to Tel Aviv and shut the fuck up.
Fuck anyone who works with him.
Brendan Gutenschwager@BGOnTheScene
“If I lived in Texas, these mosques, they don’t need your approval. Burn ‘em to the f***ing ground” Jake Lang said in Texas on Tuesday during a Frisco City Council meeting
English
English
@KellerRaym8123 @dafrickengerman @ArchetypeTheory My IQ is clearly higher than yours, the person I’m Replying to, Dalton and your entire racist community. When you commit a crime such as attempted homicide you’re held accountable. It’s not my fault he chose to shoot someone. Try again. You don’t have critical thinking skills
English
Breaking news on Dalton's Case!
Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update
Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown:
• No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone.
• Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful.
• "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it.
• "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal.
• "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal.
• "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator.
• "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually.
• Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings.
• Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless.
• Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one.
• Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony.
• Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
English
@LibertyBlitz It's likely already too late. If people don't start shooting soon, it's definitely too late.
English
“Just wait till the Boomers die and then we’ll run the country.”
Ummm what do you think all the spy cameras and data centers are for? Why are all new cars starting in 2027 gonna scan your eyeballs?
Do you really think the demonically evil people in charge don’t have a plan? The surveillance state prison is being built all around you and the response is “oh I’ll just wait for the boomers to die.” People, please wake up the hour is late.
English
@AnonXIV14 Not only are there white Muslims, there are Muslim majority European countries you Nazi clown
English
I feel it necessary to remind pеоpӏе, yet again...
Jake is jеwish, not Wһitе. He does not;
and frankly can not speak for our pеоpӏе.
I want muslims deported just as much as the next guy, however doing this shit only trashes a movement, and makes it look bad.
Jake, fuck off.
Brendan Gutenschwager@BGOnTheScene
“If I lived in Texas, these mosques, they don’t need your approval. Burn ‘em to the f***ing ground” Jake Lang said in Texas on Tuesday during a Frisco City Council meeting
English
Van Buren Township, MI
A resident is forcibly removed from a meeting for expressing her disdain for a proposed data center.
Board members says “We love data centers here”
English
@271k_only A jew woman got a government job working with my ex recently. A unionized job at that, and was fired in 3 weeks. It wasn’t even that physically demanding a position.
English
🚨Tomorrow’s BOND HEARING for CHUD is the ULTIMATE litmus test for Americans…
White Leadership in America MUST SHOW UP TOMORROW IN UNITY FOR CHUD!!!! 🇺🇸
Paul Miller
Handsome Truth
Patriot Front
Jake Shields
Ian Buyington
Nick Fuentes
Elijah
Amiri King
Stew Peters
MEN OR MICE?
English
@UBERSOY1 @Aarvoll_ @BasedTorba My understanding is Shaare Tefila Congregation v. Cobb, 481 U.S. 615 (1987) already established jews as their own race.
English
@Aarvoll_ @BasedTorba Interesting. This could legally label Jews as White or non-White in America
English
GPCamper92 retweetledi
Evidence Exonerating "Chud the Builder" discovered: (by friend of family)
Screenshots showing premeditation by Joshua Luvv to fight Dalton to launch his "twitch streaming."
Joshua Fox / Joshua Luvv Facebook comments from Jan 10, 2026 (18 weeks before the Eatherly incident)
Direct quotes from Fox's own account, in a thread with users "Kudo Menace" and "Bishop Reemo Yeezy":
• Fox: "I been hopping to run into the chud mf but he don't be on this side of town. But outside of him ima call them a bitch and go about my day 😂😂😂"
• Kudo Menace (responding): "chud just trolling us for a reaction. Don't let him bother you either. I don't think he's really racist anyway. Just click bait."
• Fox: "trying to get some traction on my end so when I start my twitch I got a little fan base 😂😂😂"
• Fox: "oh he don't bother me I just wanna fight 😂😂😂"
• Bishop Reemo Yeezy: "on the internet correct. In person? Neutralizing the threat" (followed by a "NO PROBLEM…" meme image)
What this establishes:
• Fox publicly stated his intent to physically seek out "the chud" months before the incident
• Even his own friend characterized the target as "just click bait" and "not really racist"
• Fox's stated motivation was Twitch traction and a fan base, not a response to any actual harm
• Fox explicitly said "I just wanna fight"
• This is documented premeditation. The encounter at the Montgomery County Courthouse was not a chance escalation. It was the outcome Fox had been openly telling people he wanted.
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'@ArchetypeTheory
Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
English
Here’s the arrest warrant for Dalton Eatherly, CHUD THE PUSSY. It says Dalton “reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket…during a verbal altercation” after “turning his body to a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox”. And then a physical altercation ensued” after….
ENJOY PRISON, KAREN THE BUILDER! 🖕
English
Chudthebuilder meets a Scottish lass with an absolutely brutal accent — pure chaos ensues.
English
‘Walker, who 'self–identifies as White,' believed she would be eligible to join the community based on its requirements and disclosed that she has Jewish ancestry on her mother's side..Her husband is black and they have three biracial children, per the legal filing.’
Daily Mail@DailyMail
Arkansas whites-only community sued for discrimination by woman with black husband whose application to buy land was denied trib.al/nDK85Gb
English
English
@AmiriKing @HolidayInn lol amiri is a snitch just like chud 😂 just keyboard warriors
English
I got a chef from my local holiday inn threatening my life. ✊🏿
English
GPCamper92 retweetledi
naacpldf.org/wp-content/upl…
Help us defend our right to freely associate: givesendgo.com/rttl-legal-fees
English
@BridgetPhetasy Another post exemplifying why women should be property.
English
