Prudence Morninstar

255 posts

Prudence Morninstar

Prudence Morninstar

@PrudenceMonvll

Katılım Mayıs 2026
1 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
IveBeenRadicalized
IveBeenRadicalized@Opensesame44·
@PrudenceMonvll @KellerRaym8123 @dafrickengerman @ArchetypeTheory You’re on here arguing it wasn’t self defense for chud and in the same replies saying “you’re not a lawyer but won cases”. The real icing on the cake is you calling it racist when its done for free speech purposes, you’re mentally retarded. I told you, you wouldn’t understand.
English
2
0
1
18
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'
Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

English
224
624
4.8K
373.1K
Prudence Morninstar
Prudence Morninstar@PrudenceMonvll·
@Opensesame44 @KellerRaym8123 @dafrickengerman @ArchetypeTheory Also, why would I look like a moron? I’m not a public figure advocating for racism. Dalton being locked up has nothing to do with me personally. It only affects his life. You’re not good at debating. Also you’re beneath me. I can’t entertain your slow ass anymore. 😭😭😭
English
1
0
0
18
Prudence Morninstar retweetledi
nobody
nobody@ArbbiMane·
@RichRhizo88 The funny part about all this is maga ppl are always talking about criminals being let out on bond..prior to this chud was out on multiple bonds in different cities…then he went And shot a guy. It’s not really rocket science.
English
2
1
89
1.9K
fashy stacey
fashy stacey@fashpoetic·
There should exist no greater offense to the White Man than to be badmouthed and physically attacked by the subhuman races who lie, cheat, steal, & kill to invade our beautiful nations. Our time of being overly-gracious hosts is done; they’ve overstayed their welcome.
English
24
109
699
4.8K
Prudence Morninstar
Prudence Morninstar@PrudenceMonvll·
@Opensesame44 @KellerRaym8123 @dafrickengerman @ArchetypeTheory You didn’t answer the question so I’m going to assume you never had a valid argument. You racists make it so easy. You clearly lack intelligence, morals and ethics. Thanks for proving my point about you people. 😭🥰🥰. None of you can ever debate me with facts or valid rebuttals
English
0
0
0
6
Frank Oxman
Frank Oxman@AlphaBitSage·
You realize people are shot and killed justifiably every day, right? Shooting someone is not a crime by itself. The legal question is whether the force was justified under the facts. Also, when you end with insults instead of analysis, it does not make your argument look stronger.
English
1
0
0
33
Prudence Morninstar
Prudence Morninstar@PrudenceMonvll·
@Opensesame44 @KellerRaym8123 @dafrickengerman @ArchetypeTheory Challenge accepted. Quote what I stated that was not rational and provide the reasons why it is not rational. I’m not a lawyer, but I actually know quite a bit about the law. I don’t know everything but I’ve won a few cases with irrefutable evidence cause I know my information.
English
1
0
0
17
Prudence Morninstar
Prudence Morninstar@PrudenceMonvll·
Racists are not very smart individuals. They block you when you possess intelligence and critical thinking skills. I asked for evidence and got blocked. Thanks for proving my point. 🤡🤡🤡. Baseless claims and fallacies.
English
0
0
0
10
Prudence Morninstar
Prudence Morninstar@PrudenceMonvll·
@Antaenna100 @ArchetypeTheory That’s not going to happen. 😭😭😭😭😭. The delusion is strong. Yall are a bunch of weird, hateful, racist individuals. The person who retweeted is making Daltons situations worse and will probably run off with that bootleg Go Fund Me money. 😭😭😭.
English
0
0
2
9
Antaenna
Antaenna@Antaenna100·
@ArchetypeTheory I’m amped for 9am tomorrow. I pray Chud’s bail is dropped 90% and he’s out.
English
1
0
2
32
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'
"Chuds actions dont have anything to do with what others did.... " This is what we are up against folks.
Prudence Morninstar@PrudenceMonvll

@dafrickengerman @ArchetypeTheory Once again, we’re speaking on Chud. His actions don’t have anything to do with what others did. You’re using “whataboutism” here. Try again. Also, you have to consider the factors that went into the judge deciding the bail. Try again.

English
4
2
30
922