HMTN Analyst

@probablytired2 @ItIsHoeMath Things can be awful without being the “worst thing ever” I hate when liberals do this. I hate seeing people on the right do it.

@Gar80977209 @ItIsHoeMath His argument is that *because* they were slaves, they were necessarily supported and maintained, fed and housed They didn't have freedom, but he'd argue neither do white men now

Yes, white men in 2026 are a great deal more oppressed than black men in 1826. Black men in 1826 were given free food and housing. White men in 2026 are denied resources as aggressively as possible. Black men in 1826 had a place to escape to. White men in 2026 face a global institutionalized genocide with nowhere safe to run. Black men in 1826 were thought of as inferior and forced into the lowest social class. White men in 2026 are again institutionally portrayed as inferior, forced into the lowest rung of society, told that we have no right to exist, are labeled with words like "Nazi" which means "worst possible person," and we are imprisoned and killed if we try to speak up about this. Black men in 1826 would be safe and well-fed if they did what they were told. White men in 2026, even if we do what we are told, we can be attacked in our homes by blacks and illegals who are not supposed to be in our countries at all, and if we defend ourselves the law will throw the book at us. We are not allowed to even be safe and at peace even if we slavishly obey. Black men in 1826 eventually grew into the wealthiest group of blacks in the world. White men in 2026 are going extinct in our own countries while being forced to pay for Somalians to have 20 kids apiece. I could go on, and you know this very well. Once again, you were already aware of all of these things, and you are pretending not to be because you are a stupid, evil, dirty rat, and you are emotionally, financially, and genetically committed to assisting in White genocide, having what looks to be a Chinese wife and kids. You only make yourself look stupid by trying to deny it.

@probablytired2 @ItIsHoeMath I understand what he’s saying. White men face extreme discrimination in 2026, I don’t deny this. I’d rather we confront this head-on, rather than pretend we are, what did he say yesterday, “the most persecuted minority group of all time” Come on, man

@ItIsHoeMath If you want to go down the based ancap route I’d actually agree with you. I’m not a fan of govts HOWEVER, how does this message look to normies? White men can travel freely, own weapons, speak their mind, cannot be legally raped, are not owned by another person. Night and day

@Gar80977209 White men are literal slaves in 2026. The IRS is your slave master. They take your money to feed your enemies and if you resist they kill you. It only looks ridiculous to you because you have a low IQ

@aTmtremble @NavyDigi I’m not sure, but likely air launched ballistic missiles and agm-88 variants

@Gar80977209 @NavyDigi What equipment was Israel using to hit Iranian IADS?

Everyone just watched us completely disassemble the second most capable IADS on the planet, to the tune of ZERO losses. That capability, which both RUS and UKR lack, is *why* the war in Ukraine is being fought trench to trench.

@SSameerHRizvi @StefanMolyneux Or jamming prevents accurate targeting. Plenty of options

@Gar80977209 @StefanMolyneux it's not indiscriminate, they just can't Aim.

No On the US military bases in those countries Big difference

@toddmh1969 @FaytuksNetwork The two are closely related. Fundamentally, who cares if Iran builds a conventional missile to strike the U.S.? They would kill at most 50 people, and spark a 9/11-level blowback. That same missile armed with a nuclear warhead, however…

@FaytuksNetwork No mention of ballistic missiles after Rubio just made a big deal about it last night? I doubt this real or complete

WSJ: Here the demands US brought to Iran in Geneva: 1) Destroy all 3 nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan 2) Deliver all enriched uranium to US 3) No sunset clauses 4) Zero enrichment, but can keep Tehran reactor 5) Minimal sanctions relief up front; more if Iran compliant

@crossedkeyz @sentdefender Look right below the turret

@Gar80977209 @sentdefender It looks like that but I don’t see the red and blue racing stripes looks to be all white.

Footage published by the Russian state-owned media network RT, which appears to show a naval vessel - claimed to be a cutter with the U.S. Coast Guard, however, it does not appear to represent any ship operated by the United States - closely following the Guyana-flagged Iranian-linked sanctioned crude oil tanker, Bella 1, also known as the Russian-flagged, Marinera, in the Northern Atlantic.

@MVargo6 @sentdefender The solution to a delayed project is not a replacement that is wholly unsuited to requirements

Its probably that and they keep Bradleying ship design. The canceled Constellation class only shares 15% of its design with it's parent design. The Constellation was 10% complete and its design still wasn't finalized. By forcing production fast and early, it should, in theory, prevent Navsea from fucking it up and preventing endless changes.

Making the class of ships entirely pointless. What in the actual fuck are we doing? Like seriously? Do we just want to lose to China?

@MarkoBaran @sentdefender @PM_ViktorOrban Isn’t saying if he loses the election he’ll be imprisoned extremely counterproductive? You’ve just told him he must win or his life is over. What sort of behavior do you imagine that will inspire?

@sentdefender Can’t wait until @PM_ViktorOrban is ousted, arrested, and imprisoned. Hopefully the start of the fall of the corrupt dictator mafia. Lukashenko and putin will have to die to be removed unfortunately.

Prime Minister Viktor Orban is exploring how to keep his grip on Hungary regardless of the outcome of the upcoming election in April, with polls currently showing the opposition many points ahead, as Orban is reportedly toying with the idea of assuming the presidency and rewriting laws to make it into the most powerful office in the country, a prospect that he brought up during a meeting at the White House last month with U.S. President Donald J. Trump, according to Bloomberg.

@sentdefender Erm actually those are F-35s and F-15s ☝️🤓

@Bob____19 @LucasFoxNews Maximum speed != cruising speed

@LucasFoxNews Come on now you're a "qualified" journalist and think it's only going 15 kts

At 15 knots, it will take Ford about two weeks to reach the Caribbean.

@OakPupper @Dan_Brisbois @disclosetv You’re replying to a chatgpt comment dawg

@Dan_Brisbois @disclosetv It's on flightaware

NOW - Trumps says reports that U.S. sent B1 bombers to Venezuela are not true, "It's not accurate, its false."

@jonatanpallesen @BabyAlchian @petesivey Dawg why are you pretending you don’t understand what selection bias means in your replies? People who might want kids in the future will choose larger housing from the onset. Unless the study controls for this, your assumptions are foolish or deliberately misleading

@BabyAlchian @petesivey Ok, but that still not a hypothesis that cities have a causal effect on reducing birth rates, which is the claim that the post is arguing against.

This is one of the most important findings in recent times if it holds up. We know that fertility is much lower in cities. However, it has been difficult to determine whether the causality stems mainly from "city-ness" itself or from the inability to afford sufficiently large apartments in cities. This figure suggests that it is the latter. Fertility in the city is about the same as in a suburban home with an equivalent number of rooms. This has very important implications for policy and points to a way forward in addressing the fertility crisis: • Allow much more and much higher building in cities. Also important: • Until this is achieved, halt mass immigration. Immigrants often settle in cities, which worsens the problem, especially given the limited building taking place.

@emmabgo @nytimes Maybe something happened last week that caused Mrs Kirk to move into a leadership role within the company? Maybe she was prioritizing her family until a little bit ago, for some reason? Very strange article summary

I wrote about Erika Kirk's new role as CEO of Turning Point — and the growing group of conservative women, in the Phyllis Schlafly who are telling young women to prioritize family over career, while building high-profile careers nytimes.com/2025/09/18/sty…

@emmabgo @nytimes Holy tone deaf headline