Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡

13.3K posts

Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡ banner
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡

Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡

@GazLarking

Bitcoin Adviser and sound money advocate. Not financial advice. #npub12e35m593rwz666x9chfxavxf83muw224dv4p49d6mecefyplw9ysqhjz6z

Global Katılım Ağustos 2021
1.9K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
Mr. Nobody
Mr. Nobody@MmisterNobody·
What do you think should be free in this world, but isn’t?
English
278
9
80
12.3K
Reserve Bank of Property
Jim Chalmers is in Singapore at business event explaining the benefits to startups why they should start their business in Australia under the new CGT regime
English
70
204
2.3K
101.7K
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡ retweetledi
Australian Bitcoin Industry Body
Vires in Numeris We've updated the CGT Reform engagement page so you can clearly see those those MPs who are in marginal seats. If you've not already, have your email join the almost 5,000 emails sent to MPs accross Australia. You're welcome to make the sample template personal to you. bitcoinindustrybody.org.au/engage
Australian Bitcoin Industry Body tweet media
English
1
15
35
976
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡
@MDBitcoin Price = legitimacy in many people's eyes. Only those who have done the work still understand bitcoin after a major price pullback .. it is known.
English
0
0
1
22
MDB
MDB@MDBitcoin·
I've come to realize, The highest-conviction holders usually weren’t convinced by a pitch. They hit a moment where the old system stopped making sense. Bitcoin is rarely adopted through persuasion. It is adopted through necessity. A person has to experience the problem before the solution has weight. Until then, it sounds like a trade. After that, it looks like an exit.
English
2
0
20
495
MDB
MDB@MDBitcoin·
I stopped trying to orange-pill my friends and family. Now I just let them come to me when they’re ready to buy or actually learn. The last few cycles taught me one thing you really can’t force adoption. People find Bitcoin when they’re ready. Anyone else in the same boat?
MDB tweet media
English
25
4
96
1.9K
Charles
Charles@lungdoge·
I've had a few birthdays by now but let me tell you, this one ranks as one of the least happy.
English
4
0
2
436
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡ retweetledi
Australian Bitcoin Industry Body
🚨 Vires in Numeris 🚨 This is a timely reminder that there is a resistance. Australians buying Bitcoin, and businesses working on Bitcoin products and services are fed up with the dismissive behaviour of banks who don’t want to be held accountable for their bad decisions. There are at least three things you can do to be take action, and to heard:
English
2
15
62
2.5K
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡
@pete_rizzo_ Imagine being a leveveraged degwn, they never learn.. chopsolidation wrecks levered shorts and longs with equal disdain
English
0
0
1
56
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡ retweetledi
Аnja Dragovic ⚡
Аnja Dragovic ⚡@BitcoinAnja·
ICYMI - What happens when a government budget changes the incentives of an entire country? 🎙️ @PeterBTCAdviser joins @honestmoneyshow to unpack the latest Australian budget and what it reveals about wealth, property, taxation, entrepreneurship, and Bitcoin in Australia. This conversation explores the deeper structural forces reshaping Australia’s economic future, and why incentives matter more than most people realise. 🟠 Government incentives and economic behaviour 🟠 Property rights and wealth preservation 🟠 Tax reforms and capital gains changes 🟠 Growing pressure on entrepreneurs and businesses 🟠 Superannuation and future tax risks 🟠 Debt, credit markets, and Bitcoin adoption 🟠 Wealth migration and declining trust in institutions A discussion about incentives, sovereignty, and adapting to long-term economic change brought to you by my sponsor @HardBlockBTC 📺 YouTube: youtu.be/O3p9IuY0Wfg 📷 Fountain: fountain.fm/show/0zzZDUIBP…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
5
29
1.4K
Jeremy Raper
Jeremy Raper@puppyeh1·
Literally the only people defending this heinous budget are the takers. Anyone who’s actually a net payer into the system; anyone who’s built, or trying to build something in this country, sees it for what it is - massive government overreach and yet more confiscatory policy to fund an ever encroaching handout state. See you all in Singapore 🇸🇬🇸🇬
English
25
17
399
18.2K
Simon Gerovich
Simon Gerovich@gerovich·
There is a limited universe of listed preferred shares in Japan today. Upon listing, our preferred would be only the seventh in the market, and the first perpetual preferred. We view this as a meaningful contribution to the development of Japan's capital markets, but it is also why the path to listing is necessarily deliberate. In the Japanese market, dividends on preferred shares are expected to be supported by sustainable cash flows generated from underlying operations. The listing review accordingly assesses dividend-paying capacity based on projected financial performance over a multi-year period, including scenarios across different market environments. Metaplanet already has a six-quarter track record in its Bitcoin Income Generation Business, and we believe it is important to continue demonstrating that the business can generate stable, recurring cash flows across both strong and weak Bitcoin market conditions. We are also continuing to articulate the scalability and long-term viability of our related operating businesses that support this cash flow profile. A second consideration is dividend operations. Listed companies in Japan have historically paid dividends once or twice per year. The structure we are designing contemplates more frequent distributions, including monthly dividends. Implementing this requires careful work on record-date procedures, shareholder identification, dividend calculation, and recurring shareholder notice operations. We are working closely with our partners to build and modernize this infrastructure in a manner consistent with Japanese regulatory and market practice. The process has taken longer than we initially anticipated, and we appreciate that this has created uncertainty. We are deliberate about this work because Japan today is one of the most yield-starved major capital markets in the world, and we believe a preferred equity product supported by credible operating cash flows, robust operational infrastructure, and a long-term growth strategy can meaningfully address that need. We are deeply committed to bringing this product to market, and to doing so in a form that earns the long-term trust of investors and market participants.
English
78
106
1.1K
160.2K
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡
Gary Larking 🇦🇺⚡@GazLarking·
@gerovich Great work, looking forward to how the bitcoin bull will treat the company. Mars also, if approval is ever provided.
English
0
1
1
528
HOSTIS
HOSTIS@hostis_black·
The largest open library in human history, Anna's Archive, has been ordered to pay Spotify and the three largest record labels on the world $322 million. The defendant has not appeared in court and is not going to. The site is still up with two backup domains standing by and there's nothing the censors can do. Anna's Archive currently holds 63 million books, 95 million academic papers, and 1.1 petabytes of mirrored torrents. It is free. It is searchable. It is run by a pseudonymous person nobody has identified after four long years of searching. In the four months since the music industry filed the first of three coordinated lawsuits, the library has lost six domain names and added two million books to the catalogue. The cartel is suing it faster every month, and it is growing faster every month. In December, Spotify and the major labels filed. In January, OCLC, the company that runs WorldCat, won a default judgment of its own. On March 6th, thirteen of the largest book publishers in the United States, including HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, Simon and Schuster, Macmillan, Hachette, Elsevier, Wiley, and McGraw Hill, filed a third lawsuit in the same federal court. The publishers' complaint runs to seventy-four pages. They call Anna's Archive a "brazen pirate operation." They call it "an illegal supplier of stolen content to the AI industry." The same publishers are simultaneously suing Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, and NVIDIA for training their models on the same corpus the publishers want Anna to destroy. The cartel argues, in two parallel federal courts, that the corpus cannot be used by anyone. Not the pirate who built it. Not the AI company that downloaded from it. Not the graduate student who pulls a paywalled paper from it at two in the morning. Anna did not respond to any of the three complaints. Anna has never responded to any complaint. Anna is a name on a blog and a public key on a server and a person, or maybe several people, in a jurisdiction nobody has identified after four years of searching. The judgment is uncollectable. The permanent injunction binds Cloudflare, Public Interest Registry, Njalla, the Switch Foundation, Tucows, and nine other named intermediaries. The Greenland registry is not on the list. The Greenland registry has not complied. The site currently lives at .gl, with .pk and .gd standing by. The corpus has always moved faster than the censor. The censor has always called the corpus piracy. The corpus has always survived the censor by becoming the readers themselves. The publishers' lawsuit cannot reach the torrents. The torrents are already seeded across continents and IPFS nodes and personal NAS drives owned by people the publishers will never find. The default judgment is paper. The corpus is everywhere. The cartel will win every lawsuit but they will lose the war. The publisher who walks into court next month with a fresh filing will be filing against a defendant who has, in the time since the last filing was sealed, mirrored another half million books to another seven hundred volunteers in another forty countries. There is no defendant to find. There is only the next upload. It is already seeding.
HOSTIS tweet media
English
112
1.6K
8.4K
834.2K