Genevasuggestion2345

157 posts

Genevasuggestion2345

Genevasuggestion2345

@Genevasugg77587

Katılım Ekim 2025
34 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Woody
Woody@nyrbhimself·
Akademiks calls out Sneako for getting upset over the San Diego incident manifestos, using Sneako’s own logic against him by arguing that if they’re “just words,” then he shouldn’t be mad about what the attacker wrote 😳
English
67
140
2.9K
243.2K
Skeletor 🧼🧽🫧
Skeletor 🧼🧽🫧@TheMuppetPastor·
If you’re so obsessed with a real life politician that you rewrite a show to make a mockery of him, and then violently and gruesomely murder him, it says a LOT more about YOU and your morals than it does about his.
Kaguya’s Top Gal@hayasaka_aryan

The Boys ended with a fantasy of Trump begging for his life and a parody of Elon Musk worrying about white replacement What a terrible anticlimactic ending for a terrible anticlimactic show

English
173
587
9.8K
186.8K
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@nyrbhimself Since Akademiks believes physical violence is a valid response to words, then he should have no issue with getting murdered over his speech, that may have caused offense.
English
0
0
5
2.1K
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@Zentrification1 I wonder what would happen if white people started murdering black people over the C-word or other offensive words. Would black people still believe in "free speech =/= freedom from consequences"?
English
0
0
0
44
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@ChrisCadence_ It would be really funny to see how your belief in "free speech =/= freedom from consequences" gets put to the test.
Genevasuggestion2345 tweet media
English
2
0
0
252
Chris Cadence
Chris Cadence@ChrisCadence_·
White People Make Up Scenarios To Justify Their Racism
English
397
297
2.7K
35.6K
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@Akademiks If you believe in "free speech doesn't mean freedom from consequence", then I'm sure you wouldn't mind getting murdered by someone offended by your speech now, would ya?
English
0
0
0
2
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@kevinblue345 Black guy is lucky he's separated from a screen otherwise, the white guy would educate him about "free speech =/= freedom from consequences".
English
31
0
2
9.3K
kevin blue
kevin blue@kevinblue345·
Does he look like he bathes every day? Does he look like he changes his underwear every day?
English
210
531
7.5K
62.4K
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@LeftyWinter The irony of "free speech =/= freedom from consequences" folks being afraid of the consequences of their speech.
English
0
0
0
11
Winter
Winter@LeftyWinter·
Glad they have a bullet proof glass protecting our future President. I worry about AOC's safety at times.
Winter tweet media
English
576
119
2.2K
872.4K
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@TheBrancaShow So I guess that means if conversatives what to stop leftists from mocking Charlie Kirk, they just have to threaten them violence, and when they do, shoot them and get away with it in by court by claiming provocation?
English
0
0
0
8
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@youngdonforvr @MyronGainesX I don't think you realize, Don, the precedent Chud's guilty verdict would set. It would mean we could shut you up with threats of violence, and you'd lose self defense if you defy the threat and defend yourself from the consequences.
English
0
0
0
1K
YOUNG DON
YOUNG DON@youngdonforvr·
@MyronGainesX You’re just worried that you’re next. I understand.
English
105
14
1.1K
19.2K
YOUNG DON
YOUNG DON@youngdonforvr·
Dumbass he's not in jail because he said a slur. He's in jail because he used lethal force on a guy who hit him with his hands. Being too pussy to throw hands after a guy you insulted wants to fight, does not give you the right to shoot them with a gun.
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen

I was wrong about Chud The Builder. No one's life or freedom should be forfeit over a magic no-no word. Until we're all agreed on that, the issue of propriety can take a back seat.

English
510
1K
12.6K
394.2K
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@youngdonforvr I guess that means if we want to stop you from saying "cracker" or insulting Charlie Kirk, we can just threaten to kill you if you dare say it, and if you react, you'll self defense and we can claim "provocation" as defense for responding to your speech with violence.
English
0
0
1
563
Genevasuggestion2345
Genevasuggestion2345@Genevasugg77587·
@TomJone88257703 @BBally81 Threatening people with violence to shut up and not insult them, is literately what ISIS did. Not sure why black people think adopting Islamic terrorist's strategy for forcing people to respect them would be a good idea.
English
0
0
0
2
BBally 🇪🇬 🇬🇧 ☪️
To anyone using the “Chud the Builder was just exercising his freedom of speech” argument, Chud constantly harassed black people with the intention of causing retaliation for views. That’s not free speech, that’s harassment with the intent to provoke unlawful action.
BBally 🇪🇬 🇬🇧 ☪️ tweet media
BBally 🇪🇬 🇬🇧 ☪️@BBally81

Chud the Builder is basically the white Johnny Somali. Both are piece of shit streamers whose methods of getting views are harassments and being racist to targets of their harassments. Fuck them both.

English
14
44
261
4.7K
Chris Shepherd
Chris Shepherd@Galaxy83_i·
@TheBlackChannel @MattWalshBlog @Timcast Calling a Black person the N-Word is ASSAULT. The end. What is a person's INTENTION when using a racial epithet towards another person? It's not just a word it's the energy when saying. There's a reason you get fired from your job for using the N-word. It's banned in corporate.
English
313
3
33
55K