George Kate

@mufinsp Who's is this bitch that's a pipe

Baru tau kalo ada 1 buah yang rasanya bisa ada 2

@peter_rechnagel So is over between us right? 🤷‍♀️

@djarvils @Progresivie Ich wünschte, ich könnte dich besser kennen.

Pirms 20 gadiem šis video bija humors... Tagad tas ir konkrēts @Progresivie darbības un domāšanas stils!

@CynicalLord1974 😂

I got you new girlfriend

@marklimbert6 Make sure you stop man city for us

Do spurs deserve relegation? Champions league to the championship in a few months Will they go bankrupt?

@saxonnicholls73 @DrCraigEmerson Have you forgotten I made the visa Saxon

@DrCraigEmerson What utter nonsense- “Welcome to Country” is recently a invented synthetic Marxist cultural trope. What is appalling is the hijacking of ANZAC day by the left - it does not reflect Australian property law or Indigenous culture. Forget the faux outrage Craig

Booing at the Dawn Service on ANZAC Day during the Acknowledgement of Country is not only disrespectful of First Nations people it is disrespectful of all those who fought for our country - including my father. He would have been appalled.

@saxonnicholls73 @TonySheldonNSW Ms rinehart is good woman

@TonySheldonNSW At least Ms Rinehart is paying rather than scavenging from the taxpayer

One Nation’s private jet dinners with Gina Rinehart and their voting record tell the same story - they back billionaires over working Australians.

How many likes impressions I have

Kids re good thing

@Swordsman_Pete 😂 under her pants

@GeorgeKate33 Where's the rest of her?

@saxonnicholls73 @Ryandally08 Saxon

@Ryandally08 How on earth does this woman have any credibility with her evidence when she constantly says such stupid things in public ? It demeans all law enforcement and the Courts

#BREAKING AFP Commissioner, Krissy Barrett, stands in front of the Aboriginal flag to announce that the “National Securities Investigation Teams” are a flying squad of “hate disruptors” They focus on “hate & division” “14 people have been charged” due to social media posts.

@saxonnicholls73 @RositaDaz48

@saxonnicholls73 @RositaDaz48 Talk to me Saxon

In a stunning development in Ben Roberts-Smith’s impending war crimes trial, prosecutors have ­revealed that four Australian ­soldiers who have admitted ­complicity in executing detainees have been granted immunity from prosecution in return for their evidence. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has provided formal undertakings to the four witnesses, three of whom – identified by the court pseudonyms Person 4, Person 56 and Person 66 – are directly involved in the Roberts-Smith prosecution. The move to admit evidence from soldiers given immunity for their role in multiple murders is likely to be strongly challenged by Mr Roberts-Smith’s defence team. The revelations in the CDPP’s statement of facts came as the Victoria Cross recipient was granted bail after spending 10 days in Silverwater prison, following his arrest last week on five charges of murdering unarmed detainees during his service in Afghanistan with the SAS. Mr Roberts-Smith was released late on Friday, giving a thumbs up to waiting media as he was driven away from the Sydney prison by his smiling partner, Sarah Matulin. It was alleged in the defamation case that Mr Roberts-Smith was directly involved in the “blooding” of several junior troopers, including Persons 4, 56 and 66, whose testimonies now appear to form the backbone of the prosecution. “Each of these witnesses has admitted their personal involvement in executing one or more detainees at the direction or with the complicity of Roberts-Smith,” the statement says. In each instance, Mr Roberts-Smith was their military superior.

@saxonnicholls73 @DrewPavlou You won’t say a word to me

@DrewPavlou Deport them all - they should be apologising for the Bondi massacre

The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils issues statement condemning calls to select migrants based on Australian values

@saxonnicholls73 @ctindale Hi baby 👋

@ctindale Paul Keating is OWNED by China 🇨🇳 so of course he is saying these sorts of things

Keating’s move here is the oldest trick in the political handbook: take a dispute about culture, cohesion, assimilation and national continuity, and flatten it into a morality play in which one side gets to preen as virtuous while the other is denounced as wicked. It is a way of avoiding the argument by declaring it already settled. Once the word “racism” is used as a ritual incantation rather than a serious description, the discussion is no longer about policy, citizenship, or the terms on which a nation holds together. It becomes a theatre of denunciation. And that is convenient, because the deeper question Angus is trying, however imperfectly, to reach is whether a country may still ask what sort of common culture it intends to sustain without being told that the very act of asking is morally disreputable. The historical abuse is just as bad. To drag Menzies into this as though he were a patron saint of borderless liberal abstraction is ridiculous. Menzies believed in immigration, yes, but immigration into something. Into a common civic life, a common language, a common set of national habits and loyalties. He did not believe that a nation was a hotel lobby, a place through which populations drift while elites congratulate themselves on their enlightenment. He believed citizenship meant belonging, and belonging meant adaptation. That is not racism. That is the elementary grammar of nationhood of which Keating is poor student . What Keating is really doing is protecting a modern taboo. He knows that once you permit people to discuss cultural confidence, assimilation, and continuity in plain language, the entire managerial pose begins to crack. So the racist accusation must come first because it silences. It creates a false bifurcation: either you accept the dissolving of national culture without protest, or you are to be classed with bigots and fools. That is not argument. It is intimidation dressed up as moral seriousness Much of Australia’s modern political discourse now operates through this bifurcation: not an argument about policy, consequences, or national interest, but a moral sorting ritual in which one side claims virtue and the other is cast as morally illegitimate before the real question can even be asked. As much as Keating is entertaining he’s corrosive to the country’s future

@saxonnicholls73 @ctindale Saxon 🤦🏼‍♂️

@saxonnicholls73 @AlboMP Pls for God sake talk to me pls

@AlboMP You unadulterated idiot - it’s 1 day fool

We’ve just secured an extra 100 million litres of diesel for Australia.

@saxonnicholls73 @AlboMP Saxon why you don’t want to talk to me anymore

@saxonnicholls73 @matt_barrie Baby you’ve forgotten all this Saxon

@matt_barrie What is the probability? Coincidence or correlation? Seems odd

what a coincidence

@saxonnicholls73 @AngusTaylorMP @SenSHenderson And Saxon you talking to someone else that’s replying your text I guess you talking to some scam baby

@AngusTaylorMP @SenSHenderson Well said

Response to statement from Paul Keating: I always suspected that Paul Keating didn’t support Australian values, but now he has dropped any pretence. To suggest it is “racist” to put Australian values at the centre of our immigration policy shows just how out of touch he is with Australians, as is the Labor Party. This is the immigration policy we have to have. Immigration numbers are too high. Immigration standards are too low. And both must change. It’s time for Paul Keating and the Labor Party to put Australians and Australian values first.

@saxonnicholls73 @RizviAbul So you’re online and you choose to abandon me Saxon

@RizviAbul What rubbish - the sooner we start deportations en masse the better - many immigrants do not share our values.

Everyone supports migrants having OZ values. But Taylor gives no examples of a breach of OZ values that is not also a breach of existing character provisions. Visa cancellations based on breach of OZ values would become a logistic & legal nightmare. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…