noone nobody

@thelefttake He listed the house boat as his personal permanent home on the official documents. If it was not his permanent home, he has committed fraud. So, an idiot or a fraudster… which is it?

Guys, nobody cares that Zack Polanski didn’t pay council tax on a boat he lived on from time to time. Nobody even knows you’re meant to pay council tax on a boat. Get a grip.

@Sillyshib Moron !

The press have made the British people hate Keir Starmer like they made the British people hate Megan Markle. No one could give you a coherent reason why they hate either of them

@ChrisVinceMP Delusional

The public will not forgive us if we start turning inwards. We were elected with a clear mandate. When we go into the next election with the question of who should run the country: Keir, Kemi, or Nigel - the answer is clear. Keir delivered 2024, he can deliver again.

A poll asked people if multiculturalism is working, 95% voted no, and only 5% voted yes. Since it clearly isn’t working, why do they keep pushing for more of it?

Ideologically Labour cannot turn course on immigration, net zero and economic policies that are gutting British industry, communities, towns and families. They just can't and they just won't - the dogma is too ingrained and the dogma is killing us all

You know what’s interesting about Angela Rayner’s statement? She does not mention - not once - the number one reason why 3.8 million people just voted Reform. Including why 18 of 19 seats in Rayner’s own seat just went Reform. Immigration.

@AngelaRayner FFS. Reform are a one policy party and loads of people voted for them because this is the number one issue for so many voters. Just a clue… it isn’t the cost of living.

Our party has suffered a historic defeat. Many good Labour colleagues have lost their seats despite working hard for those they represented. We have lost good Labour administrations and lost the chance for more. What we are doing isn’t working, and it needs to change. This may be our last chance. The Labour Party must now live up to our name: we must be the party of working people. We’ve heard the same on the doorstep as we’ve seen in the polls - the cost of living is the top issue for voters of all parties. People have turned to populists and nationalists because we have not done enough to fix it. Living standards are barely higher than they were a decade and a half ago. People feel hopeless - that the cost of living crisis will never end, and now they see oil and gas companies use global instability to post record profits. Once again, ordinary people are paying the price for decisions they didn’t make. It’s no wonder that across the UK, working people feel the system is rigged against them. Things can be so much better than this. Countries including Spain and Canada have shown that economies can grow and people can thrive when governments stay true to labour and social democratic values and put people first. We need to learn from that. In London, we lost young people who fear they will never afford a home. In my patch and across the north, we lost working people whose wages are too low and costs too high. In Scotland and Wales, people do not currently see Labour as the answer.  We are in danger of becoming a party of the well-off, not working people. The Peter Mandelson scandal showed a toxic culture of cronyism.  Decisions like cutting winter fuel allowance just weren’t what people expected from a Labour government. For too long, successive governments have allowed wealth and power to concentrate at the top without a plan to ensure the benefits of economic growth are shared fairly. The result is an economy that does not work for the majority, with wealth concentrated in too few hands. This level of inequality, alongside squeezed living standards, is the outcome of a model built on deregulation, privatisation, and trickle-down economics. But we have the chance to fix this.  1/2

@DarrellChaloner @AaronBastani @ShippersUnbound If it was pretty much the first statement a new Mayor made, yes! FFS prioritise solving local issues.

@AaronBastani @ShippersUnbound No point arguing with racists, especially those who would deny their racism. Local authorities have had twinning arrangements for ever. Would they be getting on their high horse if twinning with a town in France, for example, was being proposed?

I have to live among people who voted for this nonsense. How about fixing the bins

@AaronBastani @ShippersUnbound Please tell me you do understand the difference between an MP and local Councillors…

@ShippersUnbound I just don’t understand why this is articulated re one side? My MP took paid trips to Israel. Does that mean he can’t do local case work?

@Sharky_vs_cobra @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja The Casey report looked at a broad range of CSE and pretty much ignored grooming gangs. She recommended a follow up investigation into grooming gangs specifically because she hadn’t looked into them.

@Glenn02660664 @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja Didn't cover all CSE cases in general it specifically was about Rotherham, I'm not arguing against a national enquiry in itself but ine thats specifically again one race/religion instead of ALL perpetrators os pointless. The majority of CSE cases in the UK are WHITE british men

Survivors sat in a room and gave testimony. They were told the inquiry was independent. They were not told their evidence was being used to build a political party's policy platform. While survivors were still processing what it cost them to speak, Restore Britain was commissioning national polling from their testimony. While the hearings were still open, a political party's Director of Investigations was embedded in the room. The night the hearings closed, Restore Britain launched as a registered national political party. Rupert Lowe had already signed a legal declaration on 7 May 2025 stating the Rape Gang Inquiry CIC was not a subsidiary of a political party. Despite this, the survivors' testimony became the founding research of that party. Their words, their pain, their courage in coming forward, were turned into policy positions on deportation, dual nationality stripping and targeting the family members of the rapists. Yet, if we are to believe the documents submitted by Lowe, the Rape Gang Inquiry CIC is not affiliated with Restore Britain. If we are to believe his founding statement on Restore Britain, the Rape Gang Inquiry belongs to Restore Britain. Both cannot be true. Lowe controls both organisations. Which comes first? The rape gang survivors or the political party? Yes it is painful reading. And yes, I have an agenda. It is the same one I have had for the last eight years. redwallandtherabble.co.uk/the-survivors-…

@Sharky_vs_cobra @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja You are conflating issues. Nobody is stopping any other legal actions, but this is specifically to address the perception that there is a cultural element to the grooming gangs themselves and whether they received a “light touch” because of community relation concerns.

@PreetKGillMP @Keir_Starmer Yeah. But that “Contract” with the electorate was spelled out in the manifesto, and once elected, the manifesto was torn up.

A five year term, decisively won by @Keir_Starmer is not a revolving door for Westminster intrigue but a contract with the country. The challenge is to ensure that delivery is seen and felt in people’s lives. That is the responsibility of all of us. #VoteLabour

@yntkid @DouglasWhi81589 @toryboypierce O/c “people” don’t work in companies that sell whisky to the USA. Nor do these companies pay tax to the Exchequer.

@DouglasWhi81589 @toryboypierce I’m Scottish and I totally agree. Like it’s going to do any good to the people

Eat your heart out republicans. US tariffs dropped on #scotch whisky in 1st benefit of King Charles State visit.

@spookyvibes1995 @sophielouisecc This thread is specifically about jobs being available only to black/brown people. Most people regard this as blatant racism.

@sophielouisecc This demonstrates that you don’t fundamentally understand racism and its persistence/pervasiveness in employment, education, healthcare, housing, etc. It also opens the door to losing disabled and women’s access to the workplace and elsewhere.

I am the first person in this country to take DEI to task and stand up to this blatant racism. In Britain you can be denied a job if you are white. That is not the case for any other race. It is racism. And through my landmark court case - I will look to take the first step to bring it to an end. We will win this battle for fairness

@Sharky_vs_cobra @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja You seem very keen to deny that there might be a “ethnic” element to the specific issue of grooming gangs… The Casey report said this should be further investigated. The Jay report covered all general CSE in general. Lowe may be racist but in this context, so what?

@Glenn02660664 @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja I'm saying that rupert lowes enquiry is worthless due to his bias towards muslims and actively ignoring victims with white perpetrators which makes it inadmissable. The National enquiry is looking into ALL perpetrators of grooming gangs not specifically the tiny minority.

@Sharky_vs_cobra @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja 1) The inquiry is to establish whether there is a racial/ideological element to the grooming gangs and if so who is culpable in allowing them to flourish. 2) Are you really suggesting that you think the CPS would ignore clear evidence of a series crime! Nonsense.

@Glenn02660664 @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja The one that ruperts doing is purely about racism and political gain which is why is was never going to achieve anything. CPS would be highly unlikely to continue a case if evidence is gathered with bias.

@Sharky_vs_cobra @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja Not true. Maybe a private prosecution would be treated that way, but, not if the CPS pursued individual cases . They could and should consider each case in its merits. Court trials are about justice not racism. The inquiry is about accountability as well as justice.

@Glenn02660664 @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja Unfortunately because of ruperts enquiry being heavily racist and directly ignoring victims whos perpetrators are white, any evidence gathered would be shredded in court by any defendants lawyers as abuse of process.

@AdeGardens @kazmc39 @recusant_raja Have you any evidence that your funding was not used for its originally intended propose?

@kazmc39 @recusant_raja Agreed I am pleased I funded that. I did not fund putting justice in jeopardy. i trusted Rupert I thought he was a man of his word. This is so sad. This was what he said the money was for. Anything left was to help victims I presumed Maggie Oliver's trust.

@Sharky_vs_cobra @Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja There should be no need for private prosecutions. If Lowe’s inquiry has gathered clear evidence of abuse, no matter how narrow its focus, the CPS shouldn’t simply ignore the evidence.

@Paul__Erasmus @recusant_raja Rupert wont succeed in any private prosecutions and will never get justice for any victims because his enquiry has been proven to have ignored rape gang victims with white perpetrators. No CPS will take anything from his dodgy rscisg enquiry.

Yesterday's vote wasn't a test of whether Starmer is corrupt It was a test of which Labour MPs are.