Cardinal Thoughts

@WalmartThomist @ChristopherHale Also allowing a NYC social worker to have access to your kids should border on child abuse.

@ChristopherHale This is amazing, unless you allow in millions of non-Americans to also have the same benefits without paying in...then the numbers don't quite add up, unfortunately.

Pro-life, pro-family. Every Christian should support it.

@Catholicizm1 @Richard15322800 That’s rash judgement if I’ve ever seen it. That statement is a complete non sequitor. Just because she appeared on his podcast doesn’t mean Brian caused her suicide. There’s a lot you could criticize him for but that’s an unfair accusation.

@Richard15322800 It’s not a joke. He exploited her on his podcast and now she took her life

@DavidAFrench The Founding Fathers never held to this stupid idea that foreigners can come into another nation and gain citizenship just by birthing anchor babies. And even if they did, that idea should still be rejected on the basis that it's staunchly anti human nature.

Birthright citizenship is especially noxious to the populist right. They scorn it as relying on magic dirt — the idea that there is something inherent in American soil that makes a person an American citizen. Yet the same populists seem to believe in something like magic blood — that one’s lineage can make one superior. America doesn’t have magic dirt, and it certainly doesn’t have magic blood. But it does have a magic idea — the creed that declares “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” nytimes.com/2026/07/09/opi…

@huntimack @realDaveReilly @PNW_Zoomer @MLJHaynes Schism against the church is an evil act, but you commit schism against basic human nature by being a sodomite. You in no sense should be opening your mouth on anything theology related.

@realDaveReilly @PNW_Zoomer @MLJHaynes “Uh oh can’t argue with that! Quick! Deflect to sexism and blaming ecumenical dialogue!”- @realDaveReilly former Catholic and now proud Protestant

BREAKING: Holy See declares all 6 SSPX bishops are excommunicated Bishop Galarreta committed "an act of a schismatic nature through the episcopal consecration" All four bishops consecrated received "have ipso facto incurred the latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See." Bishop Fellay as co-consecrator "thus publicly adhered to the schismatic act" Holy See warns clerics & lay faithful "not to join the schism of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, because they would ipso facto incur the penalty of latae sententiae excommunication."

@realDaveReilly @MLJHaynes If a uniate church decided to stop being in communion with the Pope, their parishioners would be duty bound to no longer attend that church. That same principle applies. I feel for the SSPX and in many ways appreciate what they have stood for but this is a dangerous act.

@MLJHaynes So what does this mean? If I go to the SSPX for mass this Sunday (just like I did with no problems last Sunday) I'll get Excommunicated? What a joke. How can you get excommunicated for doing what you've always done?

@Melissa_WongMT @TheeDrGroyper Both are terrible for the soul. A whataboutism isn't going to justify something as grave as schism.

We need to return that mindset of “getting excommunicated is worse than death” in society

@JCVance3 @BreeSolstad Also, traditional protestantism holds to the right of private interpretation. So by your own standards you don't even have the authority to call her or any other Christian out if their reading of the scriptures personally tells them they can do such practices.

@JCVance3 @BreeSolstad Luther famously tolerated polygamy, which at root is as degenerate a sexual practice as any. The question of pornography is also highly debated to this day by various protestant sects. So clearly your claims are incorrect.

This is Protestantism. As much as people will shriek and try to explain it away, the truth cannot be denied. This is the rotten fruit of the Protestant revolution.

@timotheeology It is amazing how the 6 women who have been on the supreme court have all been terrible for this nation. Almost like there is a trend or something.

Told ya so

@AndrewTWalker She deserves every ounce of scorn she receives. Also the sexes are vastly different in all ways except worth in God’s eyes. Women are largely terrible at the enforcement and dispensing of justice due to their biological drive. Not their fault but they should never be in that spot

Disagree with Justice Barrett's jurisprudence all you want—that's your prerogative. But discrediting her reasoning by appeal to her sex or her status as an adoptive mother—as some on the populist right now do—is a category error. It's also textbook Bulverism, C.S. Lewis's name for the trick of explaining why someone is wrong without first showing that they are wrong: "you only think that because you're a woman." A legal argument is sound or unsound on its own terms. The sex of the one making it has no bearing on whether it tracks with the truth—the intellect's apprehension of reality is not indexed by sex. And the human intellect, male or female, is equally capable of apprehending truth. Truth corresponds to human nature's fittedness to reality as such, not truth qua sex. That sex carries real teleological weight for vocation and embodiment is true and beside the point here. The adoptive-mother line is worse because it isn't even about her reasoning. It infers bias from biography. A judge's conclusions stand or fall on the law's construction (for good or for ill), not on the shape of her family. Attack the argument, or concede you don't have one. I'm no expert on the Constitution and immigration. Justice Barrett could be wrong—if so, make that argument on the basis of text and history—not sex. Doing so on the basis of sex denies the ontological and epistemological equality of the sexes as made in God's image.

@DonaldJTrumpJr Who gives a shit? The future of the nation was essentially killed by your father’s appointment.

YUGE NEWS: The Supreme Court correctly sided with female athletes and ruled in West Virginia v. B. P. J. that Title IX allows schools to keep men out of women's sports! Damn right & it’s about time we stop the insanity. 6-3 ruling because the crazies are still gonna crazy, but I’ll take it.

Deliver us, O Lord.

@WhiteHouse You put the stupid bitch on the supreme court who screwed the future of this nation over and you want us to cheer for you? You are all clowns.

BIG WIN!

@ChristianHeiens Women’s suffrage and the 14th amendment tag teaming for another historical death keel to America’s greatness. An illegal alien with an anchor baby being equal to a 10th generation American is an unmatched disgrace.

Unless this ruling is overturned one day, then America is probably now trapped in a death spiral with no hope to rescue it. And I’m not exaggerating here. There is no possible way the Constitution could be amended to overturn this ruling. The votes don’t exist in Congress or the state legislatures and likely never will because Democrats will oppose this out of a combination of pure spite and political opportunism. They know that laws can easily become political weapons, and birthright citizenship is a weapon they alone get to use. Under no circumstances will they ever voluntarily surrender it. Why would they? Every time it’s used, it becomes stronger. It's just a matter of time until Democrats win another election and find themselves in the position to re-open the flood gates, mass import millions of culturally incompatible foreigners from the Third World, let them give birth to anchor babies, and eventually overwhelm this country's existing electorate through sheer deadweight of numbers. America will be lost in stages, with periodic attempts to fight back along the way. But baring a reversal of this case, it will be lost all the same. The Brazilification of the United States has already been underway for decades. This ruling now guarantees its inevitability unless a future one negates it.

@AFpost You can be the most loyal zionist for years to the point of stabbing every one of your allies in the back, but if you step out of line once they will turn on you in a second. A naturally disloyal and warmongering people.

Trump has lost nearly half of Israel in 3 weeks, a 46-point swing against him, with the majority of Israel disapproving of him after major Israeli figures started attacking him for the Iran ceasefire. Follow: @AFpost

@paleochristcon @LizzieMarbach By her metrics, Jesus committed necromancy because He spoke with Moses, who physically died. Or when He told the physically dead Lazarus to rise again. Dumb af and ahistorical to what the definition has always been of necromancy.

@LizzieMarbach What does that mean? Physically passed? Are you alive eternally or not?

Necromancy is simply inquiring of those who have physically passed away here on earth. Adding extra technicalities to this definition is just trying to create a loophole to justify your unbiblical practices.

@emuse1955 Galatians 1:8 is reason enough to consider the Quran and Book of Mormon to be demonic in its inspiration without even reading a word of those texts.

@majoriansmusing @Manhattva I highly doubt 19th century American conmen were considering the theological and philosophical implications of their paradigm when it comes to rebaptism lmao.

When you say you baptize everyone, you're conceding that the practice is indifferent to moral history by design. That indifference has a theological cost. Every major treatment of divine attributes from Tertullian through Aquinas holds that God's justice and mercy are not separate faculties He deploys situationally, but rather they are one conjoined act of His nature. A ritual system that applies identical salvific treatment to the victim and her murderer doesn't reflect that unity in mercy and justice. What you're describing is a system that processes Hitler and Anne Frank identically and asks us to see that as an expression of divine mercy. All it shows us instead is that your conception of God is an unjust one. It's a claim that human ritual can operate where God's own judgment makes distinctions.

Mormons really out here telling Christians they rely too much on man-made traditions while sneaking into a secret temple to baptize Anne Frank by proxy for the third time.

@tradcatboy JWs need to be removed from that list too btw.

@tradcatboy The only reason they push for this title is because it makes them look appealing to uneducated evangelicals for conversion. All of their marketing for years now has been based upon looking like just another protestant group and hiding all the crazy beliefs they have.

A foundational doctrine of Mormonism is the “Great Apostasy”, the belief that every Church literally lost the faith shortly after the death of the Apostles. They believe that all the pre-Mormon creeds are “abominations” in the sight of God. Mormons can’t have it both ways.