Golden

Cant wait for when we will be able to use this goated dex $HDN #hydranet

@coinbureau meanwhile #Hydranet is cooking offchain crosschain native swaps. all these wrapped coins are utter dogsh$t

⚡️CIRCLE TO LAUNCH WRAPPED BTC "cirBTC" The cirBTC will be backed 1:1 by bitcoin and deployed on Ethereum, Arc, and Circle Mint. It is designed to be a “secure and neutral” wrapped BTC for institutions, targeting OTC desks, market makers, and lending protocols.

@PhilMainlander @cryptoquick @_jonasschnelli_ you completely overlook the fact that its hundreds of orders of magnitude harder to make bitcoin quantum resistant

@cryptoquick @_jonasschnelli_ U aren’t wrong. It’s math. If a janky coin like $QRL can be quantum resistant then $BTC can do it

Not enough people talk about the risks of rushing Bitcoin’s quantum “fix”: - PQ signatures are x-times larger than Schnorr - Either block size war 2.0 or <1 TPS - PQC algorithms have a fraction of the battle-testing ECDSA has The cure, rushed, could be worse than the disease.

@counterpartytv qrl ftw

Threadguy reveals how many times each cryptocurrency was mentioned in the google quantum paper Bitcoin: 339 ETH: 157 Zcash: 38 Solana: 16 XRP: 14 DOGE: 12 QRL: 11

@johnso13475 @Cointelegraph qrl may not have many partnerships, but it does have a working blockchain (mainnet and a WIP PoS testnet chain that will go live in the coming months)

🚨 BIG: Google research shows a future quantum computer could crack Bitcoin's private keys in just 9 mins, 1 min short of Bitcoin's average block time. The research warns mempool attacks could become a real threat, urging immediate migration to post-quantum cryptography.

@MartiniGuyYT @GeorgeKcb350 idk is it?

@GeorgeKcb350 It's coming.

🚨WARNING GOOGLE SETS 2029 DEADLINE TO MAKE ALL SYSTEMS QUANTUM-PROOF THIS INCLUDES ALL TECH, NOT JUST BLOCKCHAIN!!

#Ethereum PQ Migration strategy, let’s break it down and get real. “Quantum computing will eventually break the public-key cryptography that secures ownership, authentication, and consensus across all digital systems.” Officially, it is no longer if, but when. Important narrative change. Definitive. Absolute. “Enabling users to transition to quantum-safe authentication through account abstraction, without a disruptive ‘flag day.’” This references migration only, not disabling legacy ECDSA signed transactions. The important part has still not been solved. The official page pq.ethereum.org explicitly states that the fate of unmigrated funds “is ultimately a community governance question. Two natural scenarios exist: do nothing, or freeze vulnerable coins.” To me, this language points toward forks. If you hold ETH today, a “do nothing” outcome leaves vulnerable coins stealable, while a freeze (or lockup in a smart contract for years) means you could effectively lose access to those funds. Either path creates winners and losers. Assuming everything runs as designed, the implication, though never stated outright, is that some legitimate accounts will lose funds. Governance decisions, and in my view inevitable forks, will ultimately dictate who keeps what. Is this acceptable? Maybe, maybe not. It is a philosophical question, and not everyone will agree. Hence forks. I see no other realistic outcome. Ethereum’s own consensus puts the at-risk portion at roughly 0.1 percent to 5 percent of supply. But here is what is not said. This narrow risk estimate assumes that all upgrades will be completed before cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) become available, development of which is occurring under extremely high levels of nation-state classification, with public timelines highly uncertain. “What is at risk” also does not factor in the very real conditions under which accounts might not migrate: dormant or long-inactive accounts, lost or irrecoverable private keys, unaware or uninformed users, technical or UX friction in migration, economic disincentives or negligible value from dust holdings, institutional or custodial or contractual barriers, immutable or non-upgradeable smart contracts, multi-party coordination failures, timing and governance delays, distrust of new PQ schemes, and legal or estate complications. Justin Drake (Ethereum Foundation researcher) has explicitly framed this view in the recent Bankless podcast, estimating that “at max two, three, four, five percent maybe” of Ethereum supply consists of funds that are “both lost and in quantum crackable addresses,” with his concrete prediction being around 2 percent, roughly an order of magnitude less than Bitcoin’s comparable exposure. He argues this small percentage carries “qualitative consequences,” leading him to “strongly advocate for not doing anything and really honoring property rights because at the end of the day, whatever, 2 percent is not a big deal.” Independent verification has not been performed and even so, well, it's probably not a big deal.... at least to 95% of the Ethereum community, minus the unrepresented account holders listed above. They might not be to happy about it. So the real question is still unanswered, how much is REALLY at risk? No one knows. Sources - (Bankless podcast, March 2026) Citations / Sources: • Official Post-Quantum Ethereum page: pq.ethereum.org • Justin Drake on Bankless podcast (March 2026): bankless.com/podcast/ethere… and full transcript at podscripts.co/podcasts/bankl… pq.ethereum.org

We have selected @trailofbits as an audit partner for QRL 2.0. Trail of Bits, renowned cybersecurity firm that played a pivotal role in auditing Ethereum’s major upgrades, will bring that expertise to the world’s first post-quantum, EVM-friendly Layer-1. More details to come.

Rebuilding 4 critical layers via 7 network forks while millions of users are transacting is an engineering nightmare, not a quick fix. 🏗️ What if Q-Day hits before 2029? $QRL is already battle-tested & Zond brings full EVM compatibility natively. Don't bet on a 4-year patch. ⚛️

@NealinNFT @QANplatform wheres mainnet

@GoldEnCD_ @QANplatform 🤣🤣 time to dive into the documents man

GM, I really don’t understand how only 14 of my friends/followers see the potential of @QANplatform . Its just insane, you all say you are into crypto and new narratives. I doubt, to be honest Algo, show this to all my active followers please

@RexLux_ @Strike_Attack what is your proposal

@Strike_Attack You dont offer a solution for bitcoin, you are doomsday preacher saying its dead. What do you think will actually happen to qrl if bitcoin dies? Do you honestly think your obscure alt coin will save the world for the collapse of trust in digital assets?

Been in Bitcoin since 2013. Ordered mining hardware when 30 GH/s was serious power (proof attached). I had DVDs before most people knew what they were, bought a 1st gen Panasonic DVD-A300 for around $700. E-mailed people I knew to prepare for Covid before it was a pandemic. Lost a friend to it as well. I’ve always been early on tech shifts. Quantum computing is a threat to #Bitcoin. But, what people do not realize, is that the threat is mostly non-technical. If you connect the dots, you realize that in order for #Bitcoin to fully go post-quantum secure, you must break some critical component of it - Compromise property ownership, remain Vulnerable to CRQCs, or fork yourself into oblivion. Those are the options. #Bitcoin #Quantum #PQC

@projecteleven ECDSA blockchains are actually screwed. theres not much time left for them. if you hold crypto then u should hedge with atleast a small % of your portfolio in quantum resistant crypto

Update your assumptions.

@TechInnovationz @SandboxAQ Bitcoin consensus and successful migration is near impossible, especially with all the sleeper wallets, and satoshis wallet. Better hedge with an already quantum resistant chain

$IonQ 🚨 QUANTUM ALERT 🚨 @SandboxAQ CEO Jack Hidary issues critical warning: "China's quantum attacks are looming. NOW is the critical moment." SandboxAQ & IonQ are partners pushing quantum computing boundaries: • Advanced catalyst discovery with Dow • Noise-resilient quantum circuits on IonQ's ion trap systems • Hybrid quantum-classical computing for real-world applications The quantum race isn't theoretical anymore it's happening NOW. 🇺🇸🇨🇳 📹👇 #IonQ #QuantumComputing #CyberSecurity #SandboxAQ

@cryptorover qrl solved this 8 years ago

SHOCKING: $ETH FOUNDER VITALIK BUTTERIN SAID QUANTUM COMPUTERS COULD BREAK ETHEREUM AND BITCOIN BY 2028.

Most people think Bitcoin can just upgrade to post quantum cryptography when the time comes. It can’t. And it has nothing to do with the reasons you think it does. Thread 👇

@piovincenzo_ @notsoeasymoney not self custodial lol

@notsoeasymoney Yeah $3,000 (literally)

On a scale of 1 to we’re fucked… How serious is the whole quantum computing thing will crack bitcoin?

@mjsXRP23 @julianhosp hedera isnt quantum resistant

@julianhosp HBAR.

If I wanted to invest 1 mil $ into a quantum-resistant crypto... which one?

@StarPunkOG @julianhosp will?

@julianhosp $XMR #Monero Bros will figure it out.