Michael Myers
31 posts


In response to community feedback, we're removing the paywall from the warden mod, we priced it in a way we thought would be acceptable, but the community has made its stance clear. We understand your positions, and have acted accordingly. Who bought the mod write to me in dm and I'll refund you money if you want, and we hope that you may donate instead.
Link in Reply
English

Because women fundamentally do not see the world objectively.
Females perceive reality from a *me* perspective. Its hard baked into their DNA, everything they think and do is in relation to themselves. For example its not about whether deporting illegal migrants is good for the economy or society (its not even about crime rates) to them its about "well how does this make ME feel" they operate on emotion and ego and will support anything that makes them *feel* good and reject anything that makes them *feel* bad.
This is why women don't think about Rome. You have to imagine putting yourself in female shoes. Why would I care about Rome? They are all dead anyways. It has nothing to do with me. Its not relevant. Not once does it occur to them that maybe Rome has parallels to modern society, or that its simply interesting.
Men make better philosophers because they are able to detach from their own egos and make observations, a man can see a fact like "different groups seem to have different average intelligence's" and he may not like that scientific conclusion but a wise man will accept it anyways, but give the same scenario to a woman: "People have to equal because if people aren't equal that's not fair and that makes me feel bad" its a completely different mindset.
To be clear, I'm not saying women are bad or even wrong for this (its how they evolved) because these traits are VERY GOOD in other ways, for example, a woman will feel worried about her husband, tell him to stop eating so much salty greasy food because his heart is fat and his blood pressure isn't good, and what will she do alone with the kids how will she take care of them. Here I cooked a healthy but tasty meal 3 times a day you must eat it we have to mind your health. Or "I don't want you riding that motorcycle with your friends doing tricks on the highway you will get hurt" etc. Its things like this that make women good nurturers and caretakers, ironically this is why feminism is such garbage, it teaches women to not do these things they are actually good at and instead "be like men" which translates to (when combined with the me mindset) "I will have fun no matter the consequences" which leads to women drinking, sleeping around and basically wasting their lives away (because they have nothing else now)
I cannot think of a single female philosopher, I think there were some (I know of at least one) but generally female philosophy is batshit insane or just highly egocentric. It varies of course. Ironically, true female philosophers are the LEAST LIKELY to seek fame/recognition and instead provide wise council to family friends and loved ones, because a woman wise enough to be a philosopher wont' have big egos in the first place, or simply are able to detach like men and be objective—its not impossible just rare.
That's why I think there aren't a lot of female philosophers.

Andrew Torba@BasedTorba
There are no female philosophers.
English

@RockChartrand This entire thing has to be ragebait.
YES there should be minimum welfare gives those who are who are unable to gain a certain income houses with electricity (internet not included) and stable food. NO these should not be considered 'good' houses, they should be livable ones.
English

“People should have” is doing a lot of work here.
Shelter, food, and electricity don’t exist by moral declaration. They have to be produced, maintained, and delivered by someone. If access is guaranteed regardless of contribution, then production must be guaranteed regardless of consent. There’s no escape from that.
A system that treats labor as an obligation turns everyone into a servant, then calls it compassion. Refusing to acknowledge this is labeled “not being brainwashed,” because once you trace cause and effect, the fantasy collapses.
Forgetting where things come from isn’t moral clarity. It’s the most effective form of indoctrination.
Matt McManus@MattPolProf
English

@GooberBrigade @DudespostingWs Man’s scared of flash and bang. That’s not a good trait for soldier of this century.
English

@DudespostingWs If you're that afraid of lightning, you probably shouldn't be a guard.
English

@worldranking_ Matter of fact went and googled it because its really not that hard, while it is true shits not gonna take enough effect till millions of years. Holy fear monger.
English

@ICEgov @LoriMills4CA42 Can we PLEASE go ahead and just lock this lying btch up already?
English

THIS IS AN ABJECT LIE.
The child was ABANDONED by his father, a criminal illegal alien from Ecuador, who fled from our officers. Our officers ensured the child was SAFE.
Does your heart also ache for the thousands of families who have lost loved ones to violent, criminal illegal alien MURDERERS?
You haven’t tweeted about those Angel Families once.
Hillary Clinton@HillaryClinton
Enforcing the law is one thing. Terrorizing a population, using children as pawns, is another. My heart aches for Liam Ramos and his family. mprnews.org/story/2026/01/…
English

@benonwine No link to article, searching for this shows nothing.
Right on.
English

The World Economic Forum has openly admitted what many suspected all along: the COVID-19 pandemic was used as a test to measure how willing the public would be to comply with their long-term vision for the planet.
Lockdowns, mandates, travel restrictions, and digital tracking weren’t just emergency measures, they became a real-world experiment in obedience, authority, and behavioral control.
Now that the admission is out in the open, people are asking hard questions about consent, accountability, and how far global institutions believe they can push societies during a “crisis.”
If COVID was the test run, what does that mean for the future?

English

@AmericanMama @WhiteHouse Me when I lie
pewresearch.org/short-reads/20….
@ABCPolitics)%20August%2029%2C%202016" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">abcnews.go.com/Politics/obama…
ucdavis.edu/blog/curiosity….
pix11.com/news/local-new…
English


Make no mistake: ICE is arresting the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens—gang members, murderers, rapists, and drug dealers—removing them from our streets. The brave men and women of ICE are true patriots.
The raid at the church in Minnesota was horrible and unacceptable. The DOJ has launched a full investigation.
English

@nettermike Exaggerated but mostly true, and that guy doesn't exist.
English

German Professor on President Trump:
Trump has been President for a year now and has achieved:
-4.3% GDP growth
-the oil price is 20% lower than a year ago
-unemployment below 4.5%
-the American stock markets have risen by about 20% during this period
-inflation is at 2.7%
-the trade deficit is the lowest in 17 years
-the crime rate has declined significantly
-illegal migration has dropped by 95%
Here in Europe, we get indignant, demonize or sabotage him wherever we can. But Trump isn't Germany's Chancellor—why should he do anything positive for us? We could, however, learn from it and actually tackle our own problems.
Trump isn't alone in this. But what I see: His team works with tremendous efficiency.
In German politics, by contrast, success is unwelcome. It is rendered impossible by a multitude of agreements, separation of powers, and regulations. The Bundestag is the best example of that.
- Prof Matthias Mordor's

English

@spelunky_ Talking about something like that in a public space let alone loud enough for others to hear clearly shows you're well adjusted to social interactions.
English

@the_jefferymead The fact that he showed restraint by not only not striking him with whatever he was hitting his car with, but getting off of him after he went full fetal, yet the guy covering his face couldn't even stop himself from damaging another persons property because they didn't gaf.
English
Michael Myers retweetledi

@Lianthesilly Think the image is saying that letting you're hobby become you're entire life and not contributing to society is the problem.
You can do whatever you want for a hobby as long as you're contributing to society and not living with your parents who gaf.
English

Genuinely what age is it still accepted to have interests do I have to abandon my stuff once im 20
Why everyone loves Pokemon@pokemon_twts
English

@RealSchlep If the idea was to almost turn it into a walkthrough telling of the events that happened in an educational manner it wouldn't be terrible. We need to educate children early on to not only be critical thinkers but also understand that no one's government is all good.
English

@Dylan55886398 @DistressDark You wanna know what happened last time a group of people tried that?
They made Gypsy Crusader.
English

@DistressDark Gypsy crusader is on borrowed time someone is going to get so mad that they'll get him
English












