hafpeezy “PzTominaga”

7.8K posts

hafpeezy “PzTominaga” banner
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”

hafpeezy “PzTominaga”

@HAFPINTMUSIC

Alhumdhulillah for everything thank god

SouthSideJamaicaQueens Katılım Nisan 2015
1.3K Takip Edilen914 Takipçiler
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
@RileySirus Another 2-3 months or 90 days and less before everyone else starts posting Csw is Satoshi and Bitcoin is bsv everywhere
English
0
0
0
6
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
Yea I hate when these guys start using names donjustify there bullshit Bringing up someone’s name doesn’t mean your points are facts It’s just showing you have no clue so you blaming someone else as an answer for your bullshit Aka people have no clue what Bitcoin is and for those who think it’s btc There answers are btc is Bitcoin because “satoshi “ lol 😂 And if you ask them how does it work or what can you do or simply what is it They will say Satoshi name lol Straight retards
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)@CsTominaga

And here comes the inevitable con job. The moment these people run out of arguments, they start name-dropping dead engineers as though invoking Hal Finney’s name magically converts nonsense into architecture. Hal did not promote your half-baked “trust me bro” shared-key rubbish. What you are doing is intellectually dishonest: take vague historical discussion, strip it of context, bolt it onto your own confused ideas, then pretend proximity to a respected figure substitutes for an actual security model. It does not. And “steganographic merge miner” sounds wonderfully mystical until one actually reads the code and discovers the same mess of external dependencies, unverifiable assumptions, local-state reliance, delegated trust, metadata fragility, and hand-waving that infects every other one of these pretend-scaling projects. The pattern is always identical. First: invent terminology. Then: declare normal engineering trade-offs “revolutionary.” Then: hide the trust assumptions behind cryptographic jargon. Then: when criticised, invoke Satoshi, Hal, or some other dead person who cannot object to having words stuffed into their mouth. The truly embarrassing part is the confidence. You speak as though sprinkling the phrase “Hal Finney way” over your project somehow absolves you from explaining: how ownership transfers, how exclusivity is enforced, how disputes resolve, how state is authenticated, how external data availability is guaranteed, how replay is prevented, how authority is extinguished, or how any of this avoids collapsing back into trust. You do not answer those questions because you cannot. So instead we get mythology, buzzwords, and historical cosplay masquerading as systems engineering. It is not scaling. It is cargo-cult cryptography performed by people who think citing famous names is a substitute for coherent design.

English
0
0
0
9
hafpeezy “PzTominaga” retweetledi
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
And here we have the classic con man’s bait-and-switch. You asked about scaling Bitcoin transactions. He answered with: “what if multiple people share the same keys?” That is not scaling. That is avoiding settlement while pretending duplicated access equals transferred value. Scaling means Alice can transact with Bob. Then Bob with Charlie. Then Charlie with Dave. Millions of times. Provably. With settled reassignment of spend authority. Not: “Alice still has the key but promises to behave.” That is not scaling. That is shared custody with extra coping mechanisms. A Bitcoin transaction exists precisely so Alice cannot later reclaim the coin after payment. Your entire “off-chain” nonsense depends upon Alice still potentially possessing access while everybody politely agrees not to mention the obvious trust assumption sitting in the middle of the room. And notice the sleight of hand: the moment security criticism appears, they retreat into: “Oh, we were only explaining paper wallets.” Exactly. Because the actual scaling claim collapses immediately under scrutiny. Paper wallets were discussed and discarded years ago because they create overlapping authority, duplicated secrets, unverifiable deletion assumptions, race conditions, theft risks, and endless trust disputes. That is not peer-to-peer cash scaling. That is cryptographic bearer chaos. But naturally the con requires redefining words. “Move” now means “copy.” “Transfer” now means “share.” “Transaction” now means “trust me.” And “scaling” apparently means “avoid using the settlement system.” It is dishonest. And when somebody knowingly promotes a system that quietly reintroduces the exact trusted-party risks Bitcoin was designed to remove, while obscuring those risks behind jargon and semantic games, people are entirely justified in calling it what it is: a fraud.
GIF
ClioBitcoinBank 🏴‍☠️@ClioBitcoinBank

@CsTominaga It is, go re-read the post. You asked for scaling and you got it. Then we had to spend an hour teaching you about paper wallets so you had an understanding of the basics, at which point you started complaining they were not secure.

English
1
1
3
215
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
What are some good ways to use bsv in a way where you don’t waste it meaning it’s hard to buy in some states and parts of the world So use it spend it in a way where I can sell the item bought or used later to get back my bitcoin Or in a way where the Bitcoin is being used to give me a output or money or usage for something else long term uses
English
0
0
0
12
Captain
Captain@CaptainBSV·
If you don’t use your #BSV then you failed the assignment entirely. The goal isn’t more fiat. ☺️
English
1
1
7
185
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
Would you bet any amount of money that a single tech has not been used in bsv since the fork ?
Bitcoin-Music-Television@TeamSatoshi

@HAFPINTMUSIC Not a single tech advantage made since the fork that was worthwhile. Endless promises & upcoming features & nothing works properly & then the big block claim is shouted out. It’s old news. Yes everyone knows the blocksize is big - now do something!

English
0
0
0
59
CryptoClub
CryptoClub@BullRushClub·
Exactly. That's a very important detail. The U.S. military didn't say "BTC". They said **"Bitcoin"** and **"the Bitcoin protocol"**. When a high-ranking commander like Admiral Paparo talks about using Bitcoin for national security, cybersecurity, and network protection — they're not referring to a chain limited to 1MB blocks and high fees. They're talking about the version that can actually handle serious scale, speed, and cost efficiency. Real Bitcoin (SV) is the only implementation that still follows Satoshi’s original vision at the level required for such critical infrastructure: - Massive throughput (already 1.1M+ TPS tested) - Extremely low fees - True finality and immutability - Unlimited on-chain capacity This is not a coincidence. The more serious institutions and governments look at Bitcoin for real-world utility, the more they will naturally gravitate toward the version that actually works as designed. The distinction is becoming clearer every week. The storm is coming. 💥
English
2
5
21
358
CryptoClub
CryptoClub@BullRushClub·
BSV Association Just Had High-Level Meetings with the U.S. SEC on the CLARITY Act — This Is Massive⚡ On May 11, 2026, a senior delegation from the BSV Association held high-level meetings in Washington with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The delegation included top-tier experts: - Connor Murray (CEO, BSV Association) - Alexander Mann (Head of Industry) - Jeffrey Golden KC – legendary lawyer and primary author of the ISDA Master Agreement - Howard Schweitzer (Cozen O’Connor) – former Acting President of the U.S. Export-Import Bank The central topic? The CLARITY Act** — landmark legislation currently moving through the U.S. Senate that aims to clearly distinguish digital commodities from securities and create a proper regulatory framework for stablecoins and digital assets. This is not a random meeting. This is strategic, professional engagement at the exact moment when U.S. regulators are shaping the future of the entire industry. Why is this extremely bullish for Real Bitcoin (SV)? Because BSV was designed from day one as a digital commodity** — decentralized, utility-first, with massive on-chain capacity and true peer-to-peer electronic cash. It aligns perfectly with the spirit and likely requirements of the CLARITY Act. While other projects struggle with securities classification issues, Real Bitcoin (SV) is positioned as one of the cleanest and strongest candidates for clear commodity status. This meeting, combined with BSV’s rapid technical progress (Teranode at 1.1M+ TPS, working stablecoins, BSVM, enterprise solutions), suggests that institutional and regulatory acceptance could arrive faster than most expect. Real Bitcoin (SV) is not waiting for permission. It is building the infrastructure — and simultaneously preparing the regulatory groundwork. The gap between where BSV is today and where the market will eventually value it is closing. The pieces are falling into place at the highest levels. The awakening is accelerating.** The storm is coming.💥 Sources: • D2 Legal Technology (D2LT) Official LinkedIn Post – May 2026 • BSV Association delegation meeting with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – Washington D.C., May 11, 2026 • CLARITY Act – ongoing legislative developments in the U.S. Senate (May 2026) • Jeffrey Golden KC, Senior Adviser at D2 Legal Technology and primary author of the ISDA Master Agreement #RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #CLARITYAct #SEC #RegulatoryClarity #InstitutionalAdoption #DigitalAssets #SatoshiVision #Commodity
CryptoClub tweet media
English
9
44
117
3.9K
Casey
Casey@BSVCasey·
@BarnettforAZ Exactly. The questions you should be asking are not; "Why is he doing this?" but: "Who is ALLOWING this to happen?" Then, and only then — do you realise how much shit we're really in.
English
2
1
8
129
Josh Barnett-AZ
Josh Barnett-AZ@BarnettforAZ·
So Bill Gates goes around the world with ticks and mosquitoes, and is also a pedophile, and no one arrests the son of a bitch?!!
English
1.2K
14.8K
62.8K
531.1K
Vivek Sen
Vivek Sen@Vivek4real_·
AMERICANS NOW OWN MORE BITCOIN THAN GOLD THIS IS WILD 🤯
Vivek Sen tweet media
English
118
423
2.3K
57.3K
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
@TeamSatoshi At this point these people don’t even care about bitcoin or anything tech They are stuck like a bad break up with there lover Stuck on Satoshi nakamoto name lol 😂
English
0
0
1
18
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
Forget about Satoshi Dr. Craig Wright is the creator of Bitcoin and blockchain technology among others as well who worked hard and dedicated their lives for our future
English
2
3
26
625
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
The fact that these guys don’t care about tech money or coins or anything by else besides Satoshi the name Should tell you how much they lack in knowledge You can introduce them into a potential multimillion dollar tech and or opportunity and these same ignorant people will bring up the name Satoshi and disagree to innovate there future But it’s nice You guys keep thinking about Satoshi While we the people change the world for billions of people Gods work gods people Help each other and better one another Be good to people And spread helpful and good information
Bitcoin-Music-Television@TeamSatoshi

@HAFPINTMUSIC Great pivot in the marketing department. Faketoshi is a legend now.

English
1
0
1
87
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
@Vivek4real_ That’s flat out incorrect One person could own 1 million addresses with a .01 btc So therefore this analysis is totally incorrect and misleading folks
English
0
0
1
38
hafpeezy “PzTominaga” retweetledi
Chainspect
Chainspect@chainspect_app·
Electronic cash at scale needs fees that are practically invisible @BSVAssociation hit a new 30-day low in average transaction fees at just $0.000003337 High-volume payments become a lot more realistic when the cost per transaction looks like this 📊 chainspect.app/chain/bsv?rang…
Chainspect tweet media
English
2
27
82
4.5K
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”
hafpeezy “PzTominaga”@HAFPINTMUSIC·
Bsv is Bitcoin And alot of big technology companies already are using and adapted and adopting as you see this post. Every country and government is already on BsV Bitcoin as digital cash currency in there country’s USA is last and next
English
0
5
24
366