Harry Ziman

@DrHWazir @DrLukeCraddock @Aadam_Aziz That was disgraceful. I hope you will complain to the TV companies.

I was on the picket line today with @Aadam_Aziz and many doctors across London. And as the camera zoomed in on us, Jeremy Kyle made comments about people having “come into this country to be doctors’’ - looking straight at us, and deciding that based on the colour of our skin. Let me be absolutely clear. My parents were born here. I was born and raised in London. I have given nearly 6 years of my life working in the NHS as a doctor. And still - in 2026 - that’s not enough to be seen as someone who belongs in Britain. This isn’t just about one comment. It’s about hearing, over and over again: “Go back to where you came from.” “We don’t want you living around us.” It chips away at you. It makes you question how you’re seen. And the worst part? It actually doesn’t even shock me anymore. That’s how normalised this has become in our society. But I refuse to shrink myself to make other people comfortable. I refuse to stay silent while doctors, people who care for patients in this country every single day, can be treated like outsiders in it. I am not going anywhere. I will keep speaking. I will keep standing up. And I will keep fighting for this profession, no matter how loud the abuse gets. Solidarity to every resident doctor across England taking lawful industrial action today. Together, we will win.

@Sunnanbyrg @sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP That could be why a whole manual was written on how to investigate such deaths. Sounds like Cheshire Police didn’t use it though.

Well... If the police are bright they'll ask how the events were identified as "suspicious" in the first place In a hospital setting many events can be recast as suspicious - this isn't a body with a dagger in it If they are not bright they'll let the nurse's accusers compile the list of events and then get an obliging expert who never loses a prosecution case cast his unreliable eye over it And then they'll have to explain why dozens of experts are now insisting the events aren't remotely suspicious They'll also have to explain why those same experts suspect that Letby was (effectively) framed

In his closing speech at Lucy Letby's trial Ben Myers alleged Dr B (V at TI) caused Child P's collapse that led to the baby's death by negligence with Dr Brearey and Dr B covering it up by blaming Lucy Letby. See attached.

@sergeantdixie @DJBandana @oh_biscuits_ @OldLodskins @RealJudgeBredd @MartynPitman @DebRoberts22249 @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @NeilRos55889793 @DavidDavisMP You need to compare the low probability of a cluster of cases with the even lower probability of a serial killer. At a national level it isn’t too unlikely that there will be a natural cluster. theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/j…

@DJBandana @oh_biscuits_ @OldLodskins @RealJudgeBredd @MartynPitman @DebRoberts22249 @noBWrexit @HarryZiman @gill1109 @simon170528 @NeilRos55889793 @DavidDavisMP My niece is an A&E consultant with over 20 years in multiple disciplines. Her comment was that this isn’t the Middle Ages where doctors have no idea what’s going on. You might get one that surprises you, but over 20 in a year is inexplicable by natural causes.

@brianoflan46772 @sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @Sunnanbyrg @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP It’s well known that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This seems to have been swept aside by confirmation bias in this case. Rather disappointing by those who are required to have open minds when reviewing evidence.

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @Sunnanbyrg @HarryZiman @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP "Suspicious" and "lacking explanation" are light years apart. The former implies malicious action is believed to be afoot.

@OldLodskins @sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @MartynPitman @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP I think you make a good point. I am not aware of any examples where LL’s testimony has been discredited. Rather the opposite as we saw with pyjamas.

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @MartynPitman @noBWrexit @HarryZiman @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Sorry Joe, the picture painted is proving imaginary. Lucy Letby appears to have rigidly stuck to the truth when the accounts of many others are now in dispute. The trial was extraordinary in many ways, the 'events' in the circumstances probably not. More facts are emerging.

@brianoflan46772 @sergeantdixie @MartynPitman @NeilRos55889793 @whyyyy94 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP My understanding is that they interviewed everyone else and left LL to the very end despite her offers to come in for interview. Now tell me that everyone was treated equally and they didn’t have anyone in mind.

@sergeantdixie @HarryZiman @MartynPitman @NeilRos55889793 @whyyyy94 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP The doctors presented the police with the suspect. There is no evidence whatsoever that the police made any good-faith effort to look into possible natural causes or alternative suspects.

@brianoflan46772 @sergeantdixie @MartynPitman @NeilRos55889793 @whyyyy94 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP They chose a suspect and then hunted for crimes and then publicly spat their dummy out when the CPS didn’t proceed.

@sergeantdixie @MartynPitman @NeilRos55889793 @HarryZiman @whyyyy94 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP In order to have a suspect, you must first have a logical reason to assume a crime. There was no such logical reason, ergo, no logical reason to seek a "suspect".

@Chuckdm44 @Mylovanov Because otherwise it is just a random assertion devoid of veracity. I have rejected nothing. I just want you to prove your claim and then I can accept it.

@HarryZiman @Mylovanov Why ? You will make up an excuse and reject it . You Ukraine lovers can’t take the truth if it smacked in the face .

Syrskyi: Russia gets about $700M a day from oil, and that money finances the war. Our strikes on refineries, Ust-Luga, Primorsk, and missile plants are strategic actions. They cut export capacity, hit military production, and reduce the aggressor’s offensive potential. 1/

@FleurPoynter @MartynPitman @NeilRos55889793 @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @RealJudgeBredd @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP It’s a classic Texas sharpshooter case. Move the target until it embraces the maximum number of bullet holes and then claim to be a marksman.

@MartynPitman @NeilRos55889793 @HarryZiman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @RealJudgeBredd @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Very true! And the jury weren’t told this either! Full article here unherd.com/2025/02/why-th… #Letby

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Watch again.

@HarryZiman @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP She doesn’t answer my question in any way shape or form. So there is nothing to rebut. She does claim hospital doctors had a role in directing the investigation which is of course a lie.

@premnsikka Do you want to charge VAT on the donation?

Hedge fund billionaire to donate £190m to Cambridge University. Elites funding elite universities, deepening the class divide. Others face financial squeeze as the state pressed not to increase taxes on corporations and wealthy elites to fund education. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Watch what Jane Hutton has to say. m.youtube.com/watch?v=iEpT9I… That’s not deflecting but a direct answer to your question. I look forward to your detailed expert rebuttal.

@HarryZiman @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Tell me how having identified over 20 suspicious incidents in a single workplace the police identify a suspect/ Don’t deflect, just answer my this simple question? Hint, the same way they do it for every workplace offence.

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Wrong. Look at what people like Jane Hutton have to say about it. Failure to recognise clear experts just discredits the points you do make. telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/09/2…

@HarryZiman @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP It isn’t a statistical argument, it’s evidence of fact.

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP No. That statistical argument has been thoroughly discredited.

@NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @HarryZiman @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP The bullshit divert technique you made up. Who was present at 1 collapse isn’t relevant. Who was present at all 20+ of them is.

@sergeantdixie @NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP That’s recycling the discredited shift rota chart evidence.

@NeilRos55889793 @MartynPitman @whyyyy94 @brianoflan46772 @DebRoberts22249 @RealJudgeBredd @noBWrexit @HarryZiman @gill1109 @simon170528 @DavidDavisMP Were these same 2 staff present at every collapse? Stop inventing theories.

@premnsikka Have you heard of the Laffer curve? Such tax rates were ineffective and easily avoided

1974: Top marginal rate of UK income tax, 83%+15% unearned income surcharge. There were no university fees & food banks Now top rate is 45% Trickle-down? 1% have more wealth than 70% of the population combined. 13.4m live in poverty, food banks everywhere, £292bn student debt

@rosiew5 @ccrcupdate @legalmarkmc @sarahknapton I would rather they acted thoroughly

Lucy Letby. Front page splash yesterday in a national newspaper that she afraid she will be victim of Huntley type prison attack. Good grief. Her convictions are undoubtedly unsafe. Cannot CCRC act fast refer her case to Court of Appeal? @ccrcupdate @legalmarkmc @sarahknapton

@ContrarianJolly @gill1109 @DebbieKennett @OldLodskins @DebRoberts22249 @noBWrexit @FleurPoynter @BRD0464 Worse than that, the CoA fell into the same trap while loudly proclaiming they they didn’t.

Yes, the funny thing is that people like Debs sort of get it, but then manage to miss it completely at the same time. But, probabilities are so counterintuitive. If we can all get the Monty Hall problem wrong, and fall victim to base rate neglect—and we all do—we should not be surprised that prosecutors, judges and juries do too. “The fact she was highly unlikely to commit murder is beside the point, if she actually did commit murder”. This is correct. But (unlike Debs, who is special, obviously) a criminal court deals not in “ontological certainty” — unimpeachable truth— but “epistemic uncertainty”—a collection of observations from which inferences must still be drawn. These are not known knowns. They can only be estimated. They are expressed as probabilities. There were not witnesses. No-one knows. The jury must draw inferences. It can only do that probabilistically. Expressed in Bayesian terms: “That Ms. Letby’s prior probability of committing murder was very low is beside the point, if posterior facts indicate strongly that she actually did commit murder”. Correct. If. A very low “prior” probability can be converted to a very high “posterior” one, if there is specific information justifying it. That information is “evidence”. Evidence is very important. Evidence can be strong—a room full of eyewitnesses; closed-circuit TV footage—and it can be weak: random words scribbled on a post-it note. In Ms. Letby’s case, there is very little strong “posterior information”. There is a striking absence of evidence that specifically implicates Ms. Letby. this is why the staff attendance sheet was so pivotal. Nothing else, in the slightest, implicates Ms. Letby specifically. Nothing whatsoever. There are fewer implicating correlations than you would expect by sheer chance. Hence, the CPS were obliged to resort to things as feeble as “oh look! she wrote the word insulin next to the title of a Roberta Flack single on a cramped piece of A4 that someone found in her handbag three years after the alleged event!”

Of all the things the “Evanites” say, the least compelling is “but you are hurting the feelings of bereaved parents.”

@oh_biscuits_ @sergeantdixie @OldLodskins @RealJudgeBredd @MartynPitman @DebRoberts22249 @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @NeilRos55889793 @DavidDavisMP The cross examination was rigorous and extensive but that doesn’t mean the information given to the lay jury wasn’t nonsense.

@sergeantdixie @HarryZiman @OldLodskins @RealJudgeBredd @MartynPitman @DebRoberts22249 @noBWrexit @gill1109 @simon170528 @Seagreen2707 @NeilRos55889793 @DavidDavisMP You say it was “tried and rebutted”. You actually mean incomplete, complex and befuddling medical nonsense was delivered unopppsed to a jury of lay folk with god only knows what level of intelligence, education, scientific and medical understanding. You think that’s ok? #Letby

@Chuckdm44 @Mylovanov Please share the data that underpins that statement. Thank you.

@Mylovanov The Russians output is unchanged they fix this stuff in a day a week at most . They manufacture the parts themselves dumb ass