Beelzebubba

18.7K posts

Beelzebubba

Beelzebubba

@HawkStrologer

Katılım Ağustos 2021
375 Takip Edilen113 Takipçiler
Football Analysis
Football Analysis@FBallAnalysisYT·
Emmanuel Pregnon to Seattle at pick 32 makes too much sense
English
31
8
247
20.7K
Beelzebubba retweetledi
G-PA INDY
G-PA INDY@GPAIndiana·
I am pretty sure this violates at least a couple of laws of physics! 🤣 That was Amazing
English
291
1.2K
19.1K
1.3M
Beelzebubba
Beelzebubba@HawkStrologer·
@bestofstarwar God Emperor Leto ruled the galaxy for thousands of years. There’s levels to this.
English
0
0
0
81
Marcus Mosher
Marcus Mosher@Marcus_Mosher·
I don't see how Spencer Fano isn't widely considered a lock top-10 pick. ✔️Three seasons of excellent production ✔️Can play multiple positions (563 snaps at LT, 1646 at RT) ✔️Allowed just two QB hits and 20 pressures over the last two seasons. ✔️Only 21 years old ✔️Elite athlete (9.75 RAS)
English
38
14
327
49.6K
Beelzebubba retweetledi
Vinnie Tortorich
Vinnie Tortorich@VinnieTortorich·
In 1932, a doctor ran a 10-year experiment that the food industry would rather you forget. Dr. Francis Pottenger fed 900 cats across four generations. Two groups. One ate raw meat and raw milk. The other ate the same food — processed and pasteurized. The raw food cats were healthy. Generation after generation. Strong bones. Normal behavior. Normal reproduction. The processed food cats fell apart. First generation — degenerative disease set in by middle age. Second generation — disease came earlier. Third generation — born sick. There was no fourth generation. They couldn't reproduce. When cats were switched back to real food, they recovered — but it took several generations to fully return to normal. Pottenger concluded that processing destroys something essential in food. He didn't know exactly what. We now know it was largely taurine — an amino acid cats can't make themselves, destroyed by processing. The food industry's answer wasn't to stop processing. It was to strip the food, add back the isolated nutrient artificially, and keep selling the same product. That's still the model today. Your food is processed. Then they sell you back what they took out. Usually in a worse form. Then they slap a label like "enriched" or "fortified" on it...to make you think you're getting something EXTRA. Question everything. #NSNG #NoSugarNoGrains #ProcessedFood #RealFood #PottengersCATS #QuestionEverything
English
18
570
1.2K
40.6K
Corbin K. Smith
Corbin K. Smith@CorbinSmithNFL·
Question for all the 12s today... Who is the "dark horse" prospect at a position that isn't perceived an area of need that you could see the #Seahawks drafting with their first pick? Either at #32 or after a trade down. Writing a lengthy piece on the subject on @EmeraldSpectrum.
English
40
1
31
10.2K
Beelzebubba
Beelzebubba@HawkStrologer·
@curtis93969 Didn’t the firm line between “man” and “zone” go away awhile ago? Doesn’t McDonald mostly call stuff that’s a mix?
English
1
0
0
137
Curtis Allen
Curtis Allen@curtis93969·
Some #seahawks context here. The league as a whole runs about 30% man coverage. The #seahawks have run in the 15% range under Mike Macdonald. Riq is great in man but when you're running zone 85% of the time...
NFL Researcher@NFL_Researcher

Yards per snap allowed in man coverage among DB in 2025 (minimum 125 snaps), per @NextGenStats... Fewest 1. Kyle Hamilton - 0.3 2. Riq Woolen - 0.5 3. Quinyon Mitchell - 0.6 4. Jamel Dean - 0.6 5. Deommodore Lenoir - 0.6 Most 57. Darius Slay - 1.9 58. Kool-Aid McKinstry - 2.1 59. Darrell Baker - 2.1 60. Emmanuel Forbes - 2.1 61. Marlon Humphrey - 2.3

English
3
2
62
11.6K
Beelzebubba
Beelzebubba@HawkStrologer·
@MathBomb lol I’m guessing he hadn’t practiced the 3-cone much.
English
2
0
63
2.7K
RAS.football
RAS.football@MathBomb·
Uar Bernard is a DT prospect in the 2026 draft class. He scored a 9.90 RAS out of a possible 10.00. This ranked 23 out of 2270 DT from 1987 to 2026. ras.football/ras-informatio…
RAS.football tweet media
English
20
55
414
279.8K
Beelzebubba retweetledi
Corbin K. Smith
Corbin K. Smith@CorbinSmithNFL·
Posing a hypothetical for today's @LOSeahawks... If Notre Dame's Jeremiyah Love falls out of the top 7-8 picks and you were the #Seahawks, would you be willing to move pick No. 32, next year's first and a future mid-round pick to trade up for him?
English
141
3
122
27.7K
Beelzebubba retweetledi
Mads
Mads@MadsPosting·
Mads tweet media
ZXX
45
2.8K
42.5K
600.2K
Beelzebubba retweetledi
Musafir
Musafir@MusafirNafar·
Former Israeli MP Moshe Feiglin on Israel's most watched news show: "As Hitler said, 'I cannot live if one Jew is left,' we can't live here if one [Palestinian] remains in Gaza.” When people tell you who they are, believe them
English
833
13.2K
36.8K
1M
Beelzebubba
Beelzebubba@HawkStrologer·
@tuckerdfranklin And by “turbodogshit” we mean the top 0.001% of humans playing that position, not 0.0001%. Just to be clear. I still laugh and think “turbodogshit” all one word every time I see “former first rounder” so thank you for this Gary Treeman.
English
0
0
0
1.1K
Beelzebubba
Beelzebubba@HawkStrologer·
@hawkblogger Late first seems like the sweet spot for the type of EDGE rusher the Seahawks used to great effect last season. RB is just a matter of if price is there at 32. Maybe Coleman in the third. Much less options. CB class seems good at the end of 1st or 2nd. S class less deep.
English
0
0
0
50
kira 👾
kira 👾@kirawontmiss·
“If the Iran deal doesn’t happen, I’m blaming JD Vance. If it does happen, I’m taking full credit.” - Trump How is this guy real?😭😭
English
634
3.5K
43.2K
1.5M
Carolina Painthers
Carolina Painthers@CAR_Painthers·
so 5115 196 is an undersized wr but “one of your favorite players” that’s 6000 199 isn’t?
Carolina Painthers tweet mediaCarolina Painthers tweet media
English
26
4
395
52.7K
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
Jordan Peterson shared one of the most sobering statistics I’ve heard in a long time. The U.S. Armed Forces — after over a century of careful psychometric research driven by life-and-death necessity — will not induct anyone with an IQ below 83. They concluded that there is simply nothing in the military (at any level) that such a person can be trained to do without being counterproductive. Peterson noted that this threshold captures roughly one in ten people. And if the military’s complexity is even roughly comparable to broader society, that means about 10% of the population has no viable place in our cognitively demanding world. He emphasized that this isn’t about lack of money or short-term training. The data shows it’s extremely difficult to turn low cognitive ability into the kind of adaptive, creative problem-solving that modern society requires. It’s a raw, uncomfortable truth about human variation that most people prefer not to discuss openly. What do you think — is this statistic something society needs to confront honestly, or is there a better way to think about it?
English
1.1K
1.8K
10.5K
2.4M
Beelzebubba
Beelzebubba@HawkStrologer·
@FieldGulls Stinky overall though I like taking a swing on banks if they stock extra picks
English
0
0
0
171