Henri Fortuin
3.7K posts

Henri Fortuin
@Henri_F
Music, literature, science, philosophy, news.
South Africa Katılım Mayıs 2010
87 Takip Edilen88 Takipçiler

@Mufasa0062 Biggest problem is Public Works not repairing broken equipment.
English

@runningmann100 The number collection setup is very impressive this year. Lots of pleasant young people serving us.
English

FEEL FREE TO BUG A BOARD MEMBER
Lovely article covering the 5 board members who will be running the ultra on Saturday: twooceansmarathon.org.za/leading-by-exa…
Feel free to chat to any of us along the route with your questions/improvement ideas (just hold your thoughts up Constantia Nek please).
English

@Simon_Ingari Poor planning, incompetent management expecting to be rescued by unpaid overtime.
English

A friend of mine hired a young employee in her department, 21 years old. Yesterday he told me:
“Can you imagine—it's the end of the month, reports are due, everything is hectic, and this young girl stands up exactly at 6:00 PM and starts getting ready to leave. When I told her it would be good to finish the report since it has to be submitted tomorrow, she replied:
‘My working day is until six, and I plan my personal matters accordingly. I’m not obligated to stay late. Organize the work properly so that people don’t have to sit in the office in the evenings.’
She turned around and left.
I’m in SHOCK! Is this what the so-called “healthy boundaries” of Generation Z look like now, or is it just immaturity and unwillingness to work?”
English
Henri Fortuin retweetledi
Henri Fortuin retweetledi

According to Devyn Cousineau of the BC Human Rights Tribunal, this is hate speech and I am violating the BC Human Rights Code by posting this.
You will be too, if you repost this.
Will you let Cousineau's implicit threat of a massive fine scare you into silence?
The American Girl@TheAmericanGrl
English

NEW: “I’ve been covering this controversy for about a decade from a left-of-center perspective, and I’ve found that anyone who questions these treatments, even mildly, is invariably accused of bigotry.”
🧵on @jessesingal’s important new piece in the New York Times this morning.

English
Henri Fortuin retweetledi

@Sosie2 You have the right to walk naked down the street, but would you? You have the right to be refused service also. And the right to walk out empty-handed.
English

@KrisztinaMaria Sounds like the omnibus bills in the US Congress
English

EU Follow-up❗️
The recent vote in the EU, which included wording about gender and biological definitions, and where a majority voted against the position that only biological women can become pregnant, has sparked debate… with good reason!
But it is not only the result of the vote that raises questions. It is the way it takes place.
In the EU, large comprehensive packages are often voted on. Several very different issues are gathered into one single text, and you can only vote yes or no to the entire thing. You cannot vote point by point.
This means widely accepted elements and highly controversial ideological changes can be bundled together. Even if many disagree with one specific point, it can still pass because the majority supports the rest of the package.
It does not feel like transparency, but rather like a political tactic.
When fundamental questions about gender, biology and definitions are embedded in larger compromises, they do not receive the independent and open debate they deserve.
This is where, in my view, it begins to resemble manipulation.
Because the consequence is that normative changes happen without clear and isolated decision-making.
When, for example, gender in official documents and political texts is gradually loosened from biological definitions and made more flexible or linguistically neutral, it changes the way we talk about reality.
Language matters. Words carry great power.
If biological categories are downplayed or replaced with broader formulations, it affects public debate and the framework within which we understand society.
This is not about denying that people experience themselves differently. It is about whether biological realities should continue to be the foundation of legislation and official texts.
When that debate is not taken openly and directly, but instead packaged into broad agreements, it creates a slippery slope.
Not because the world collapses tomorrow, but because norms change gradually and without voters being given a clear opportunity to take a position on that specific issue.
We see it as well in climate and energy packages, economic relief packages, immigration and asylum reforms, digital regulations and surveillance issues, military or security agreements, and so on.
And I believe this is a huge problem, because it slowly but surely undermines and dissolves everything our strong foundation is built upon.
The only way to stop all of this is for the majority across Europe to raise their voices and create the necessary counter-pressure - the kind that cannot simply be ignored.
In the end, the people hold the power.
But that requires them to take responsibility, instead of sitting at home binge-watching Netflix with their hand in a bag of chips, silently watching while the world falls apart around them. Get up.🦍💃🪽❤️🔥

English


















