@elonmusk Shame on your Elon for re-posting this. I'm sure you consider this free speech, but it offers no value to the real issues in this election. Please stop.
English
Hoaloha Robotics
307 posts
Hoaloha Robotics
@HoalohaRobotics
A company dedicated to creating autonomous, socially-interactive robot companions to empower the growing number of people needing assistance with daily living.
Katılım Mayıs 2010
119 Takip Edilen2.7K Takipçiler
The governor of California just made this parody video illegal in violation of the Constitution of the United States.
Would be a shame if it went viral.
Mr Reagan 🇺🇸@MrReaganUSA
Kamala Harris Campaign Ad PARODY
English
@aurimas_knepa @tsarnick Yep. HB promised us Rosey in 1962. Then Bushnell after he sold off Atari, but so far the only success has been Roomba. That said, simpler forms (but not humanoid) may get here soon.
English
@tsarnick I am still waiting for robots to come. Several decades passed already.
English
Jensen Huang says in the near future, humanoid robots will be available for $10-20,000
English
@tsarnick Too bad he doesn't give a timeframe. Consider that an NVidia Jetson module alone is ~$1600, and you need batteries, motors, sensors, etc. Unlike cars, which are driven by a human brain, it will need a lot more software to do all those tasks we want. How much is a Telsa Model X?
English
Creators “have got to paid” Hear, hear! What’s the plan?
Matt Burgess@mattburgessca
Sam Altman on artist pay with Generative AI "People have got to get paid" Artists want to: - Opt-out from people using AI to generate their style - Get paid when they opt-in One of the most powerful people in AI supports a model where artists get paid
English
@MelMitchell1 @tlbtlbtlb As a happy Dublin resident - I’d be really shocked if those lines didn’t work! #AIfordating !
English
In honor of OpenAI getting into the tourism business, I found some ways your chatbot can enhance your Dublin experience.
OpenAI@OpenAI
We are partnering with @DubCityCouncil to explore how GPT-4 can enhance European tourism for visitors and cities. This exploration will include the creation of an AI assistant for bespoke itineraries and a hands-on AI workshop for European city leaders. dublincity.ie/news/dublin-ci…
English
What if there were technology options that extended your potential to age in place?
nytimes.com/2023/11/19/hea…
English
English
20+ @cruise driverless in Austin, TX. [Thanks to Tandy Trower & @garymarcus] This system is not ready for deployment at scale, and it is not a good business model to be subjecting people going about their lives to disruptive experiments that piss them off. instagram.com/reel/CxiMHssNA…
English
@GaryMarcus Glad you had a great trip, but would have preferred it had been to DC at Schumer’s invitation. Hopefully he still will.
English
A long day’s journey around the globe: Met with the Mayor in Seoul earlier today and made it to San Diego just in time tor the last rays of sunset.
English
@GaryMarcus This is why it is a folly to assume these companies can be “self-regulating”. If OpenAI, Microsoft, etc. could be trusted they would already be transparent about the data they used.
English
Fascinating article, fascinating potential lawsuit
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20…
English
@StefanFSchubert @GaryMarcus @anilkseth My take is that tech/tools (e.g. phone, calculator, etc.) doesn't have to be conscious to be useful. Further as we don't fully understand how conscious works, it is somewhat a folly to assume we can or should.
English
That sentence doesn't say they ought to be built.
There's nothing wrong with analysing this question. On the contrary, those who want such systems *not* to be built should welcome careful analysis of what sorts of AI systems could become conscious. If you don't know those conditions, you can't prevent it.
English
But do we actually *want* to build conscious machines? I am not at all sure it is a good idea.
Cc @anilkseth
Eric Elmoznino@EricElmoznino
1/8 Thrilled announce our new preprint, which considers the question of consciousness in AI from the perspective of leading theories in neuroscience. A big multidisciplinary collaboration with people from philosophy, neuroscience, and AI! arxiv.org/abs/2308.08708
English
@aidan_mclau @GaryMarcus @anilkseth Gary can probably speak for himself on this, but snake oil can be considered dangerous to ingest even if it is not effective.
English
@GaryMarcus @anilkseth Gary, I ask you seriously:
How do you reconcile your claims that Generative AI is a dud with your fear of current capabilities?
English
@bobehayes @GaryMarcus Perhaps a starting point would be to stop calling this stuff artificial “intelligence” and use a more appropriate term like “Statistical Heuristic Inference Technology “😆
English
"What would make artificial general intelligence general is generality: the ability to cope with new things. And that’s precisely where current #AI is still lacking." ~ @GaryMarcus
#ArtificialIntelligence
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus
No, Virginia, AGI is not imminent. Some thoughts on what AGI is — or should be — and why we aren’t close, expanding on my recent conversations with DeepMind cofounder @shanelegg Available at Marcus on AI or wherever restricted Subst@cks are sold. (link below)
English
Current examples of AI demonstrate some amazing results but it is important to understand that it isn’t without risks, (that are much more pragmatic than the imminent destruction of humanity). This post provides a balanced perspective on the issues. spectrum.ieee.org/self-driving-c…
English
@etzioni But where is the commitment to transparency regarding what data they are using for training or commitment to compensate those whose data they use or commitment to enable people or entities to opt out of their data being used?
English
English
English
LLM hallucinations will be largely eliminated by 2025.
that’s a huge deal. the implications are far more profound than the threat of the models getting things a bit wrong today.
English
@VinceMtenga @GaryMarcus If you are implying that Gary Marcus is a Luddite, you don’t know Gary, or understand his concerns. But maybe you are one of those rogue AIs he warns about that often get the facts wrong.
English
Stephen and Chey Cobb: Independent Researchers: What is ChatGPT and how can AI get things wrong: an annotated example using jackware scobbs.blogspot.com/2023/04/what-i…
English
@cosmojg @ylecun @emerywells I think you misunderstand how GPT works, in that it’s responses are derived from the collection of information it was trained on. So if there is no history in its training of human developing that, it isn’t going to generate that.
English
@ylecun @emerywells no, but it could probably write the code required to get a robot to do it
and given OpenAI's interest in multimodality, GPT5 could probably design the robot, complete with sketches
it might be shit, but it might work
English
Before we can get to "God-like AI" we'll need to get through "Dog-like AI".
English
@MelMitchell1 @katecrawford Public statements from most of the suppliers of these technologies suggest that they agree, but there seems to be NO ACTION that they are taking to proactively move in that direction.
English
I didn't sign "the letter".
Current AI poses lots of risks, but describing these systems as "ever more powerful digital minds" that no one can control is likely to make the problem even worse.
What's needed: more transparency and better public discourse.
English
@GaryMarcus Major creators of LLM technologies (e.g. OpenAI, Microsoft, etc.) have publically acknowledged that 1) there are potential dangers now, 2) that there should be regulations around use, and 3) that there should be more transparency. So where is their commitment to these objectives?
English
Wrong question. All five could lead to disaster.
Without rank ordering them, I will note that (e) can be used to subvert very large numbers of people (e.g., a la the Captcha incident and via production of misinformation that could increase aggression), thereby potentially increasing issues with (a-d).
It’s not either/or. These are all genuine concerns.
nferraz@nferraz
@GaryMarcus @GaryMarcus Which one is the *least* important threat: a) Nuclear weapons b) Biological weapons c) Conventional weapons d) Climate Change e) GPT-5 Which ones could possibly kill millions of humans and, more importantly, how?
English