HomeoftheMad

@CCFrancisBooks @grok @Osinttechnical Iran is doing the same thing. We shot first. We didn't force Germans or Japanese to leave their country during WWII. Israel is planning on doing this and has done so in Lebanon.

Right but there was a reason for those attacks. It wasn't random. Israel was attacking militants to neutralize a threat. Gaza isnt ethnic cleansing. It's what happens in war. People seem to have forgotten this because it hasn't happened in so long. Gaza looks a lot like Dresden or Tokyo in WWII.

USAF B-52H heavy bomber returning to England from an Iran cruise missile strike mission this morning.

@CCFrancisBooks @grok @Osinttechnical Countries Israel has attacked since Oct 7: Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, plus threatening Iraq and Turkey, bombing neutral ships in the Mediterranean, and ethnically cleansing Gaza and killing people in the west bank.

@HomeoftheM @grok @Osinttechnical Israel didn't randomly shoot every neighboring country after 10/7.

@CCFrancisBooks @grok @Osinttechnical Israel has nuclear weapons that has attacked all its neighbors. Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons. I see no reason to think they will have nuclear weapons.

@HomeoftheM @grok @Osinttechnical That's not ok. You can't have a country with nuclear weapons that acts like a terrorist whenever it is threatened. If/when the UK was in range of Iranian nuclear missiles, they would use them to extract concessions.

@CarlosCur11 @MarioNawfal If you want war with Iran you hate America.

@MarioNawfal Another on sided news against our country

🇺🇸 Rep. Ro Khanna says Americans are turning against the Iran war $2B a day, 13 U.S. troops already lost, and no clear path to regime change Even Republicans are worried about gas prices and more deaths Pressure on Trump is starting to crack his support

@ansan1963 @MarioNawfal Politicians were involved in war planning in the world wars. The anti war movement happened back home because the war was a stupid idea.

@MarioNawfal America defeated in Vietnam for 2 reasons 1-Politicians involved in war planning 2-rising of anti war movement back home in WW1 and 2 didn’t have these 2 factors and won

@Eleutheroph0bia @MarioNawfal Iran is about to have nuclear weapons...but also the people who oppose the war are panicans? The doublethink is funny.

Iran has demonstrated beyond any doubt that they shouldn't be allowed to have any kind of substantial artillery, let alone nuclear weapons. The only people against this operation currently (as it hasn't even been 1 month yet) are click-chasing Panicans and Woke Leftist nutjobs that see this murderous regime as virtuous victims.

@CCFrancisBooks @grok @Osinttechnical We weren't attacked on Oct 7. The reason why the GCC was attacked is because we started shooting. Iran does not have nukes.

@HomeoftheM @grok @Osinttechnical Should we have waited for another October 7 - or the recent attacks on Gulf allies - but featuring ICBMs and fission bombs?

@CCFrancisBooks @grok @Osinttechnical Europe did help us when we were attacked. The difference here is we are the attacker.

@grok @HomeoftheM @Osinttechnical Europe will not help us, and would not if we were attacked - maybe time to let them be

@CCFrancisBooks @Osinttechnical @grok The director of national intelligence said their ability to make a bomb was destroyed after July and they hadn't closed that gap. Lend lease was aid only paid for if it was destroyed. Why would they help us here? The UK and NATO is a defensive alliance, we started this war.

It had fissile material for 11+ fission warheads. Making a gun-type bomb is trivial, and they had thousands of ballistics already. Referring to similar assistance that US provided in WWII - UK did very little to assist vs Iran threat @grok why not dissolve NATO and leave Europe to fend for itself?

@CCFrancisBooks @Osinttechnical @grok What lend lease are you talking about? Why would the UK help? Iran does not have nuclear weapons.

@HomeoftheM @Osinttechnical @grok @grok Where is our lend lease now? Why will UK not help? Iran ballistics & nuclear is shared threat

@CCFrancisBooks @Osinttechnical @grok 1. A lot 2. That doesn't negate my point

@HomeoftheM @Osinttechnical @grok How many Americans died fighting with the British in WWII?

@PapaJ555 @ianbremmer @gzeromedia They've been "about to get a nuke" for decades according to Israel. I'm done buying it.

@HomeoftheM @ianbremmer @gzeromedia Do the math of stopping Iran now from funding proxies and getting a nuke vs. waiting to after Iran has a nuke. Many trust systems of rules more than systems of power. My point is simple: without power behind them, those rules don’t hold under stress. That’s the real debate.

this war isn’t about whether the us can win militarily. it’s about whether the aftermath is manageable. @gzeromedia

@CCFrancisBooks @Osinttechnical British soldiers killed in Afghanistan.

@Osinttechnical We need to get our bases out of England. The UK is not our ally. We should seize Diego Garcia by force and tell these clownish cucks to take a hike.

@PapaJ555 @ianbremmer @gzeromedia I don't think so. They had a lot taken out last July and are still focusing efforts on immediate defense.

@HomeoftheM @ianbremmer @gzeromedia Iran now has the skill, will and nuke fuel to make it happened in months and no longer years.

@JonatanD2045 Even if we leave Hormuz will still be hostage. The crisis won't end.

@HomeoftheM Because they didn't hold it hostage. But with how little of a plan the US has and how much of an ass Israel is, it might be better if it just cuts its loses and leaves. Problem is Iran is going to make the nuke and then maybe SA.

Why are oil speculators assuming this war is short and irrelevant? Yesterday I talked to an energy analyst I highly respect, and he waved off the Iran situation. Oil/gas markets are dynamic and flexible, he posited, they can handle it. They did during the Ukraine war and Covid. Countries will switch to coal, change behavior, et al. That's what Jim Cramer was saying as well, he said he just couldn't imagine Iran controlling something important, just bomb them to the stone age, he said. Then I listened to @TheStalwart and @tracyalloway conversation with @Rory_Johnston and Johnston noted that this view is the conventional wisdom in the markets. That makes sense. Recency bias is that shutting Hormuz is manageable, just as shutting off Russian oil exports was manageable. in 2022. The markets will realize this situation is different, but it'll take a bit more time. Then when something serious breaks, they'll panic. There will be the pre-panic era, which we're in now, and then the post-panic era. The world will look fundamentally different.

@JonatanD2045 Nobody cares about money when you're facing death which they think they are. Israel hit Iran's gas production and all it did was spur an escalation. Right now the White House is considering removing sanctions on Iran actually: reuters.com/business/energ…

@HomeoftheM Because their country really needs that oil money.

@MktInsight7777 @BrianSozzi You're assuming that every ship that leaves is a VLCC and that it's all going to China. Even if it was all going to China that means everyone else that buys from Hormuz isn't getting oil so we're still in a crisis.

@HomeoftheM @BrianSozzi 1 VLCC = 2MBPD China imports 5 MBPD through straight. 2.5 ships per day...

Goldman Sachs: pretty much nothing is still going through the Strait of Hormuz.

@MktInsight7777 @BrianSozzi Everything I've seen shows I'm right and I've cited it.

@HomeoftheM @BrianSozzi Your research is not very good or you simply are not looking very hard....

@MktInsight7777 @BrianSozzi Yes. I already pointed that out earlier. 90 is extremely low. Before the war it was around 100 every day. 90 total this month means about 5/day.

@HomeoftheM @BrianSozzi keyc.com/2026/03/18/abo…

@MktInsight7777 @BrianSozzi Again that's true. That wasn't the point I was trying to make, I was just correcting that.

@HomeoftheM @BrianSozzi You were contesting it: "Only a small amount of Chinese oil comes from Iran." that is your quote. That is your quote. Why are you changing the story now?