Pera

278 posts

Pera

Pera

@Hos1__

Permanently positive $ANyONe $LINK $SDL $PEPE $ALPH $ONDO

Northern Mariana Islands Katılım Şubat 2018
111 Takip Edilen27 Takipçiler
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@CCIPTracker Keep in mind this tracks just the DeFi side of CCIP fees and volume...
English
0
0
0
136
Pera retweetledi
ROGER MOON | HCC
ROGER MOON | HCC@rogermoonCrypto·
That's right ladies. We don't stop. $ANYONE is about to take off. 🚀 One quick look at their new VPN app, and you instantly know this privacy coin is destined for billions: play.google.com/store/apps/det… @AnyoneFDN // $ETH $ZEC $XMR
ROGER MOON | HCC tweet media
English
5
12
79
838
Pera retweetledi
LINK Archive
LINK Archive@LINKArchv·
Sergey explains why CCIP is the most secure cross-chain infrastructure “CCIP has many individual key security design decisions, but three of the larger ones that I tend to think about when I look at its security compared to other cross-chain systems would be the amount of decentralization that actually confirms a transaction” “There are cross-chain systems that are basically multi-sigs of one, two, three sets of signers or keys. Then there are cross-chain systems that are basically hubs where all transactions flow through one hub” “And then there's CCIP, which for every single lane has three oracle networks. Not three nodes, but three individual separate networks responsible for confirming three separate aspects of the transaction” “The amount of decentralization within CCIP just by the amount of nodes independently verifying key parts of the transaction in a very focused way is at a much higher level than any other bridge” “The second key difference is the fact that there's a risk management layer. So, there's a risk management network, which is one of those key networks where you can encode specific policies and configurations and conditions around how to approach different security risks that might emerge” “If a specific chain has a certain type of risk—it reorgs, there's reliability issues, an adversary has invented a new attack—you have a place where you can go and you can write some code and encode those set of risks and those set of conditions separately from the core protocol” “So, you're not changing the core protocol that provides the core security; you're adding security by putting more conditions on what a transaction needs to meet in the risk management network” “So, you're keeping the core security in a stable protocol and you're adding more security by putting more code, more configurations in the risk management network. This is another kind of layer of decentralization and the ability to quickly adapt” “One of the third key things that was done is actually that the two core transactional networks—the committing DON and the executing DON—and the risk management network have been written in separate codebases” “The core protocol is written in a completely separate codebase in a completely different language, initially written by a completely separate team from the team that wrote the risk management network in its own codebase and its own language” “And both of these parts of the system are continuing to be very separate not only in how they operate, but also in that they're separate codebases written in separate different languages” “And this is a very significant difference because even if you're able to break one of those codebases because you know one language or you found one flaw, that flaw does not extend to the other codebase” “And so it's really the only bridge in which you have a kind of client diversity and separate codebases interacting with each other in a secure way” “There's many other great security features within CCIP that far surpass what you see in other bridges, and that's why CCIP has been operating successfully with no value loss, no hiccups, continual reliability, and a bunch of other successful outcomes” “I think it's something that the time that it took to build was a good decision, and that's consistently what I see when you make infrastructure that's going to process and move and interact with trillions of dollars in transactional value, which is what the Chainlink system and CCIP are being built to do” “Our goal is not to just transact and process the transactions and move the data of today, but it's to do that for the whole world in the trillions and trillions of dollars, possibly at some point even reaching the size and amount of transaction value that you see in the traditional financial system, which is in the quadrillions per year”
English
7
45
225
24K
MOUZ
MOUZ@mousesports·
We are making the following roster changes effective immediately. Our roster will be as follows for the next three tournaments: Astana and Shanghai: • xelex • Spinx • torzsi • xertioN (IGL) • jL (On loan from NAVI) Cologne Major: • xelex • Spinx • torzsi • Brollan • xertioN (IGL) #VAMOUZ
MOUZ tweet media
English
290
171
6.3K
1.5M
Chainlink
Chainlink@chainlink·
$₿Ξ€¥ → $LINK
Ελληνικά
55
269
1.1K
54.6K
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@ecom_joseph Yep seems like you have to be super specific in what you're asking. Now you have to tell it to take certain things into consideration. It won't think. It just does what you ask it to and saves as much tokens as it can
English
0
1
1
4.3K
Joseph Siegel
Joseph Siegel@ecom_joseph·
Yeah Claude Opus 4.6 is nuked RIP
English
153
34
2.2K
756.9K
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@usernamoss @arcamids If you think that way you're ill informed. Token is designed in such a way that higher value = higher security for the whole network. But we'll see man, I don't have a hurry in the world
English
1
0
1
18
brass
brass@usernamoss·
@Hos1__ @arcamids Good luck with the circulating supply. Sergey doesn't care about token price and if you don't realize that you don't have the brains for this.
English
2
0
1
29
brass
brass@usernamoss·
@arcamids I would refrain from using the word supply shock and $link in the same sentence. At this rate that's about 20 years away.
English
1
0
1
174
MountainCity
MountainCity@StevenY03870741·
@ChrisBarrett Read the comments of the original post. Looks like the once great community has figured out Chainlink is only in for the team. Team getting rich while token holders lose. The Link Marines have had enough losing and have moved on (not that the team cares)
English
1
0
3
55
JC
JC@jccrwchmc·
@WuBlockchain Meanwhile, the paid shill, mentally-weak blocking retards like @ChainLinkGod and @LINK_Zilla will claim the meaningless Reserve buybacks are important while ignoring this
English
1
0
5
376
Wu Blockchain
Wu Blockchain@WuBlockchain·
According to EmberCN, Chainlink completed its routine quarterly unlock around an hour ago, moving 19M LINK (about $165M) from 3 non-circulating supply addresses. About 14.375M LINK ($125M) was sent to Binance, while 4.625M LINK ($40.1M) went to multisig address 0xD50...8Af. Chainlink typically carries out a similar unlock every ~3 months, with most tokens sent to exchanges and a smaller portion used for staking rewards.
Wu Blockchain tweet media
English
25
14
131
29.1K
Ivan 🎖️
Ivan 🎖️@Ivan_the_gent·
🚨TRUMP'S NEW CYBER STRATEGY IS POWERED BY CHAINLINK $LINK 🚨 President Trump’s new U.S. cyber strategy pledges support for the security of cryptocurrencies and blockchain networks connected to real-world data through Chainlink. $LINK 🫡🇺🇸
Ivan 🎖️ tweet mediaIvan 🎖️ tweet media
Coin Bureau@coinbureau

🔥TRUMP'S NEW CYBER STRATEGY BACKS CRYPTO President Trump’s new U.S. cyber strategy pledges support for the security of cryptocurrencies and blockchain networks.

English
13
68
441
26.3K
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@baebong42 @DMG3465 To me it seems like 1k will probably be enough. 2030-2032, beyond that Link will likely scale much more though...
English
0
0
1
16
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@TheLinkPanda @arcamids @ChrisBarrett @Crypto_BitC @thegraphers This list is just retarded grifting ragebaiting fagotts. Might aswell consider this list as who you should block if you didn't want trash on your feed. X algorithm is the reason these profiles gain traction. Hope it will change soon.
English
1
0
4
64
⬡ The Crypto Panda ⬡
⬡ The Crypto Panda ⬡@TheLinkPanda·
Follow these top 10 $LINK geniuses! @arcamids if you want that chainlink patent in yo face! Yeah you want it. @ChrisBarrett if you want that fresh out of the gate chainlink news on the run. @Crypto_BitC if you want the reasons why $LINK will be $1000+. @thegraphers if you want some half positive and half negative news. I don't get it sometimes. XD @TheLinkPanda You know why you follow me. The most bullish bear in crypto. @ChainlinkP If you want an OG to tell you exactly what's going to happen. @ChainLinkGod If you want to follow the biggest Chainlink account with direct ties to chainlink itself. @ARiHBARi If you want full skitzo behavior, funny, bearish, bullish, who knows what you're gonna get... I don't, he probably doesn't know either haha @QuintenFrancois One of the biggest crypto advocates in the space. Definitely follow this guys. @veryHighLander A smart contract architect with direct knowledge on Chainlink and how they use it at @Overtime_io
⬡ The Crypto Panda ⬡ tweet media
English
15
13
137
7.5K
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@MrMib @thegraphers Yeah that's a hypothetical situation and has nothing to do with reality though... In reality chainlink svr could capture maybe 1% of that at maximum so 1920 dollars per staked 1k link. I don't know why you pull numbers out of your ass and state them as facts
English
1
0
1
53
Maⓣthew
Maⓣthew@MrMib·
This is part of $LINK economics 2.0 road map. Makes total sense. People need to understand how huge RWA and derivatives will be. We’re talking global financial system not just crypto. Asked grok some speculative questions about Chainlink powering global RWA and Derivatives markets and projected liquidations “In this highly speculative scenario assuming Chainlink scales SVR to trillions in global markets with realistic recapture rates, annual Chainlink SVR revenue could reach tens of billions (e.g., around $72 billion in an extreme upside case), leading to roughly $8.64 billion passed annually to stakers at the 12% share. With the current Chainlink staking pool capped at 45 million LINK (community pool fully filled at 40.875 million LINK plus node operator allocation, per official staking.chain.link data as of February 2026), this would equate to about $192 in annual revenue per staked LINK, or approximately $192,000 in pass-through revenue for every 1,000 tokens staked—representing massive potential value accrual for LINK holders if SVR achieves widespread TradFi/DeFi adoption. 🚀 “
GIF
English
4
0
24
824
•iskorpitx
•iskorpitx@thegraphers·
Today at Chainlink Labs, a project manager mentioned that the possibility of distributing 12% of SVR revenue to Chainlink stakers twice a year in USDC is being considered. This is the first step towards a dividend system. $LINK
•iskorpitx tweet media
English
21
25
313
9.8K
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@CryptoWealthMgr Yes same few relay operators hoarding vps relays into some african shithole. Very decentralized when same few operators hold 90% of total relays👍 Hoard all the relay and staking rewards, making it impossible for smaller fish to turn profit. Then dump on stupid bagholders 👍
English
0
0
0
19
Crypto Wealth Management
Crypto Wealth Management@CryptoWealthMgr·
Genuine adoption going on behind the scenes for $ANYONE 📈 41 relays PER DAY added on average. Crazy numbers. 3x+ that of TOR network. Whilst the project is valued at only $15m. If you’ve done your research, you know where this project is headed… 🚀
MOZKO 🧠@DONMZKO

Since this post, which is 588 days ago,24145 relays have been added. Which equals to 41 relays added per day on average. $ANYONE relay adoption is still Parabolic.

English
5
8
57
1.9K
Pera
Pera@Hos1__·
@LinkBoi777 @chainlink Enjoy your block. Btw I suggest everyone else to do the same for retarded grifters like him. this makes X give them less visibility in general.
English
0
0
3
185
LinkBoi
LinkBoi@LinkBoi777·
Yesterday I came across something while doing some research on @chainlink. I couldn't believe my eyes when I first saw it. But after some more digging I couldn't unsee it. I couldn't sleep tonight. It just kept crossing my mind. It is something I can't stop thinking about. If it is what it seems to be. It will change crypto in general. Not just Chainlink. It's far bigger than that. Growth in crypto seems slow but I don't think this won't take long anymore. Once this information is known by the whole community it won't take long before we see ATH. $Link will reach ATH in several hours after the announcement and won't come back down anymore. $Link will be the biggest winner of all. I don't know when this information becomes public. But I recon it won't take that long. @ARiHBARi @arcamids @nicucrypto They probably all know. But I don't know if they grasp the scope of this advancement.
English
39
8
133
19.8K
The Factor Report
The Factor Report@PeterLBrandt·
Last chart question for the day. Is this a head and shoulders? Top noted in the box area? Yes or no. If no, explain your reason.
The Factor Report tweet media
English
215
10
266
188.3K
Pera retweetledi
ANyONe Protocol
ANyONe Protocol@AnyoneFDN·
See this working example of routing @monero CLI traffic through the Anyone Network. Our onion routing network ensures that, while using existing Monero RPCs, no server can link your transaction data to your IP address or location. See the guide: 🔹 docs.anyone.io/sdk/integratio…
ANyONe Protocol tweet media
English
32
94
358
52.1K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
Which privacy coin is your top pick for 2026? $ZEC or $XMR? 👇
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
935
110
1.4K
127.1K