HoyaHusky

5.1K posts

HoyaHusky banner
HoyaHusky

HoyaHusky

@HoyaHusky

I'll be honest: no bio description will make my page seem coherent. Just go with it, ok?

Katılım Ekim 2016
350 Takip Edilen79 Takipçiler
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@CoffeewClassics This perfectly encapsulates my opinion on it. It actually makes the translation worse because it’s not ignorance but rather modernist partisanship that underlies the entire translation.
English
0
0
6
199
CoffeeWithTheClassics
CoffeeWithTheClassics@CoffeewClassics·
If you insist on debating for the umpteenth time whether Emily Wilson’s “complicated man” was an appropriate translation of “polytropos,” please at least acknowledge she knowingly chose it as a reference to the “complicated man” pop culture antihero trope that was en vogue when she wrote her translation. She knew exactly what she was doing with her opening line. It was a bold choice that triggered the reaction she intended. Pedagogically, the choice is not indefensible, but it captures only one aspect of the word’s double meaning. Other translators had sound reasons for different choices, most of them imperfect too. My problem with her word choice (to the extent I even care, life’s too short) is the extra-textual and anachronistic cultural baggage it imported, not the word on its own.
English
32
6
254
19.9K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@jkauf38669 @zachflipspages Very readable. I read it when I was 12 and really enjoyed it. Takes forever though, and the middle of it with the Italy stuff is a bit of a drag, but only for like 100 pages or so.
English
1
0
0
21
Josh
Josh@jkauf38669·
@zachflipspages Is it readable? My fear with all classics is the prose being archaic and brutal to get through.
English
3
0
0
142
Zach Flips Pages 📚
Zach Flips Pages 📚@zachflipspages·
My midway update of the The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas:
English
10
8
277
9.7K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@SandyofCthulhu Elrond should be the only human. He’s so wise and respected because he’s just some guy.
English
0
0
0
8
Sandy Petersen 🪔
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu·
Yes yes. No one wants to see Lord of the Rings remade. But hear me out. MUPPETS. One or two should be live people. Sam? Merry & Pippin? Who Do you think?
Sandy Petersen 🪔 tweet mediaSandy Petersen 🪔 tweet mediaSandy Petersen 🪔 tweet media
English
312
52
1.4K
40.1K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@nick_kapur I guessed 1910. Candlesticks are a dead giveaway it’s older than you’d expect.
English
0
0
8
2.4K
Nick Kapur
Nick Kapur@nick_kapur·
Quick, guess which year this painting was painted? (answer in the reply)
Nick Kapur tweet media
English
176
147
5.5K
2M
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@Will_Tanner_1 True but there’s some issue with the artificial fixing of the price of gold that impacts this comparison. It was fixed at $20.67 in order to keep the dollar stable.
English
0
0
12
398
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@LadyHalcon1986 @VirtueCrusader @bonchieredstate @varadmehta Plutarch uses it as “complicated” and Thucydides uses it as “various.” It’s usually described as many-turned (and that’s roughly how I’d translate it) but she’s not factually wrong for translating it as “complicated”
English
0
0
0
38
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
The Odyssey pitch meeting: The Room: “You’ve got the greatest mythology ever written in its original form. You’re going to use that, right?” Christopher Nolan: “Nah, I’m gonna use this 2017 version written by a left-wing feminist that changed stuff to fit her politics.”
GIF
English
87
956
11.5K
110.3K
Noam Blum
Noam Blum@neontaster·
Interesting to see most negative reactions to the Odyssey press tour coming from what would normally be Christopher Nolan's most robust fanbase. I'm very curious how this might affect its numbers.
English
47
8
390
22.3K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@MattWalshBlog @NWordBiden The rise of progressivism in the 20th Century and the woman’s rights movement. I find it interesting how different the suffrage movement was from modern third and fourth wave crazy stuff.
English
0
0
0
59
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
So far with Real History we have given you the true story of slavery, the American Indians, the Civil War, and the civil rights movement (part 2 coming in a few weeks). What historical episode would you like to see us tackle next?
English
2.5K
457
8.3K
436.1K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
In terms of the literal words, yes you can. Words have multiple translated meanings that are grammatically and functionally correct. Each of these are functionally correct translations of the opening verse, but they vary in tone because they prioritize different things. Wilson’s translation, interestingly enough, most similar to Fitzgerald in that they both use iambic pentameter to preserve the original pace of the text. In that sense, she and Fitzgerald are more “accurate” than Lawrence or Fagles. I take issue with Wilson because she intentionally tones down the overall poetic connotation to make the entire epic seem less divine and fanciful, but to say she isn’t being technically correct in her translation is just incorrect.
HoyaHusky tweet media
English
1
0
7
175
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@Andrew669631 And this graphic doesn’t even consider the cost of raising the sheep
English
0
0
2
628
Andrew Эквадор
Andrew Эквадор@Andrew669631·
I found out that our Marxists friends don't understand surplus value or even info-graphics. You have to explain it to them as if they were kids. I took effort to make this.
Andrew Эквадор tweet media
English
335
631
6.9K
1.1M
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@bumbadum14 @JadeAtrophis Also isn’t this a good argument for nuclear? Like you’re a rural state that needs a ton of power. Why not fuel the entire thing with nuclear and reap all the economic benefits with virtually zero effect on the environment?
English
1
0
3
301
bumbadum
bumbadum@bumbadum14·
It’s literally the anti nuclear movement all over again. Just massive fear mongering based on nothing. The amount of heat generated on earth from the sun is 100 million atomic bombs. Totally useless metrics exclusively designed to scare people.
Pubity@pubity

Kevin O'Leary's proposed data center in Utah will require 9 Gigawatts of energy to function when fully built, double Utah's current energy usage for the entire state. It will dump around 23 atomic bombs worth of thermal load on the environment every day.

English
214
487
5.6K
154.9K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@motivatedjoy @MaxNordau Dobbs didn’t do that. It returned the decision to the states, and many states still have it as a right. And even if you mean it destroyed her federal right to choose, that was effectively done by Casey anyways and yet no one did anything about it in response.
English
1
0
40
562
Mj✡︎
Mj✡︎@motivatedjoy·
@MaxNordau Oh gosh, I don’t know, maybe because it striped her of her right to choose? Are you okay?
English
52
0
17
12.3K
Max 📟
Max 📟@MaxNordau·
Feels like you’re not cut out to be a lawyer if you react like this to reading Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Maybe pass a law banning theater kids from attending law school?
English
149
145
6.1K
391K
HoyaHusky retweetledi
Sarah Fields
Sarah Fields@SarahisCensored·
Texas pregnancy deaths did NOT suddenly rise 56% because abortion was banned. The statistic they’re throwing around measures year-over-year increases from 2019–2022… and Texas didn’t ban abortion until August 2022. I’ll give you one guess what major event happened between 2019 and 2022 that might’ve impacted pregnancy-related deaths. Hint: it wasn’t the abortion ban.
GOP Ls@GOP__Ls

🚨 Pregnancy related deaths in Texas have jumped 56% since abortion was banned.

English
95
1.2K
13.3K
902.9K
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@Aelthemplaer How is that flight path shorter/safer than just going across the Pacific Ocean?
English
0
0
1
18
HoyaHusky
HoyaHusky@HoyaHusky·
@ashwxrya As someone currently attempting to write a high fantasy novel, I don’t know where to stand on this lol
English
3
0
1
2.5K
Ash
Ash@ashwxrya·
Ash tweet media
ZXX
59
275
5.2K
245K
PoIiMath
PoIiMath@politicalmath·
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. All the "smart" Democrats are saying that the court should have addressed this issue before the election. But the Court says IN THE DECISION: "Thoughout this litigation, the Commonwealth (ie the Democrats) has insisted that we cannot lawfully decide this case prior to the referendum" Before the election, the Democrats *successfully* argued that "courts cannot interfere to stop any of the proceedings while this permanent law is in the process of being made" The Democrats WON the argument that the Courts MUST allow the election to go ahead without ruling on the constitutionality of what they were voting on Now they are complaining that the Court should have ruled on this case before the election. This is the most cut-and-dried case of intentional idiocy I've seen in at least a week and a half
Adam Parkhomenko@AdamParkhomenko

The best argument re: Virginia decision I’ve heard is this:

English
230
1.5K
9K
348.3K