Hunter Stires

8.4K posts

Hunter Stires banner
Hunter Stires

Hunter Stires

@HunterStires

History, Strategy, Seapower, Statecraft. Proudly served as the Maritime Strategist to the 78th Secretary of the Navy. Be curious; when you can, be kind.

Like/RT/Follow ≠ Endorsement Katılım Eylül 2014
5.9K Takip Edilen3.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Hunter Stires
Hunter Stires@HunterStires·
History demonstrates that: 1) No great naval power has long endured without also being a great commercial maritime power. 2) No great naval power has long endured that cannot build its own warships. 3) Ships win battles. Shipyards win wars.
English
2
10
37
3.7K
Hunter Stires
Hunter Stires@HunterStires·
@cdrsalamander Apparently one particularly obnoxious Army LTC is, in fact, under that impression.
English
2
0
5
223
cdrsalamander
cdrsalamander@cdrsalamander·
I served with 0.0 Company Grade, Field Grade, General and Flag Officers who thought this is what national security is. If we needed war colleges and JPME to “teach” this simple fact, then we would need to shut down our service academies, ROTC units, and OCS schools until we figured out exactly what is going on. What a silly comment, Tom.
Tom Nichols@RadioFreeTom

Thinking that "national security" is limited to "whatever people do in the Army" is one of the reasons that war colleges and national security education programs exist: To help military officers get past this narrowness and understand how civilians make national security policy.

English
14
24
200
9.8K
Hunter Stires
Hunter Stires@HunterStires·
Big thanks to @katekelly for including my perspective in her deep dive into the impact of industry political influence efforts on the Navy’s USV acquisitions in @nytimes: “‘While politics has always been a factor in defense procurement, what we are seeing in the way companies are navigating the second Trump administration is very different from what we have seen in the past,’ said Hunter Stires, who was the Navy secretary’s maritime strategist until last year.” nytimes.com/2026/07/14/us/…
English
1
1
5
574
Henrietta Levin
Henrietta Levin@Henrietta_Ivy·
This is not "I'm a confident and enduring great power" behavior...
English
1
0
2
136
Henrietta Levin
Henrietta Levin@Henrietta_Ivy·
This is pathetic - in a way that's oddly reminiscent of the CCP. Why would Rubio feel threatened by a borderline symbolic court holding no real authority over the US? Why would China cut off trade with a small country 6000+ miles away after Taiwan opened a tiny office there?
Secretary Marco Rubio@SecRubio

The International Criminal Court seeks to become the unaccountable arbiter of a new global law — empowered to prosecute and arrest our citizens at will and existentially threaten American sovereignty. We will teach the ICC the full meaning of American resolve.

English
4
3
9
1.7K
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Admiral Mike Franken
Admiral Mike Franken@FrankenforIowa·
Hey, MAGA... So now Trump has volunteered our US Navy to 'own' transit collection in Hormuz, for a commodity he says we don't need, that was free passage before he blew up a girl's school, because his SecDef cut targeting staff, because Epstein files must NOT be released.
Forest Heights, MD 🇺🇸 English
17
327
908
7.6K
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Senator Roger Wicker
Senator Roger Wicker@SenatorWicker·
The Russian sanctions legislation championed by my friend Sen. Graham will continue to have my full support in the Senate. We should enact this bipartisan measure to exert maximum economic pressure on Putin’s war machine and help bring this unjust war to an end.
English
67
155
819
17.6K
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Jay Nordlinger
Jay Nordlinger@jaynordlinger·
It drives our "post-liberals" crazy to hear Zelensky described as "Churchillian." All the more reason to do so? When Trump asked Zelensky whether he would be willing to go to Moscow, to meet Putin, he answered, "It is difficult. There are a lot of Ukrainian drones there." Moscow is "dangerous." As remarks go, that is frickin' Churchillian. I think Sir Winston would smile and recognize a (rare) kindred spirit.
English
16
105
627
59.7K
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Ray Powell
Ray Powell@GordianKnotRay·
As a reminder, a primary reason there cannot be a #SouthChinaSea Code of Conduct is that 🇨🇳#China has routinely, blatantly & systematically violated Articles 3-5 of the very same 2002 DOC agreement @Chinaembmanila invokes below. These articles read as follows: 3. The Parties reaffirm their respect for and commitment to the freedom of navigation in and overflight above the South China Sea as provided for by the universally recognized principles of international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea; 4. The Parties concerned undertake to resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes by peaceful means, without resorting to the threat or use of force, through friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states directly concerned, in accordance with universally recognized principles of international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea; 5. The Parties undertake to exercise self-restraint in the conduct of activities that would complicate or escalate disputes and affect peace and stability including, among others, refraining from action of inhabiting on the presently uninhabited islands, reefs, shoals, cays, and other features and to handle their differences in a constructive manner. The Code of Conduct negotiations depend on the existence of good-faith negotiators. China has proven to be nothing of the sort.
Ray Powell tweet media
ChineseEmbassyManila@Chinaembmanila

On the basis of the full and effective implementation of the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (DOC), China is actively advancing consultations on the DOC. China has the confidence and determination to work with relevant parties to overcome distractions, bridge differences, guard the blue waters, and coexist in harmony.

English
7
49
114
4.2K
Hunter Stires
Hunter Stires@HunterStires·
@cpgrabow BECAUSE WE KILLED THE REST OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE MARITIME POLICY IN THE 1980S
English
0
0
0
41
Colin Grabow
Colin Grabow@cpgrabow·
Bingo. There's almost zero shipbuilding (0.03% of global output) and there are far more effective/efficient means of providing US citizen crews to meet sealift needs. The Jones Act is a failure.
John Arnold@johnarnold

Jones Act is based on idea that higher shipping costs are worth paying to preserve the capacity to build and crew ships in wartime. If the tradeoff was real, maybe. Instead, we've ended up with the worst of both worlds: higher costs, but still without the shipbuilding capacity.

English
1
4
33
5.2K
Hunter Stires retweetledi
The American Waterways Operators
We don't allow foreign airlines on domestic routes. We don't allow foreign trucking companies to move freight between U.S. cities. Why allow foreign vessels in our domestic waters? Over 100 nations enforce cabotage laws. Why waive ours??? #EndTheWaiver @realDonaldTrump
The American Waterways Operators tweet mediaThe American Waterways Operators tweet mediaThe American Waterways Operators tweet mediaThe American Waterways Operators tweet media
English
7
9
33
8.7K
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Hunter Stires retweetledi
Collin Koh 🇸🇬🇺🇦
Allowing PRC to host the secretariat is an affront to UNCLOS. Of course, if Beijing starts to recognise and abide by the 2016 arbitral award on SCS it’ll be a different matter.
Bill Hayton@bill_hayton

Big question now is which country will host the BBNJ Secretariat. The choice is Brussels, Valparaiso (Chile) or Xiamen in China. If only China could be trusted to respect international maritime agreements and rulings…

English
18
17
79
7.2K