Absolute Welsh ICP Conviction

AWS can host the hardware. ICP ♾️ by @DFINITY turns it into cloud engines. ICP ♾️ by @DFINITY is not just leading, it is separating. This chart shows ICP at 4,700 average TPS over the last month. That is: 38.2% higher than Solana at 3,400 TPS 2,168.3% higher than BNB Chain at 207.2 TPS About 51.1% of all TPS shown on this chart combined Slightly higher than the combined TPS of every other chain shown by about 4.6% And it gets better. The chart shows ICP at 10 ms average block time versus Solana at 395 ms. That is about 97.5% lower block time. Now add cloud engines on AWS to the picture. AWS can provide the infrastructure, but ICP adds the sovereign execution layer. That means the real story is not just raw speed. It is the idea that enterprise workloads can sit on hyperscale infrastructure while gaining the benefits of onchain execution, integrity, and auditable logic through ICP. So this is not “AWS or ICP.” It is: AWS for the metal ICP for the trust layer Cloud engines for the next step That is why this matters. If ICP is already posting 4,700 TPS, taking 51.1% of all throughput shown here, and doing it with a 10 ms block time, then cloud engines are not some side narrative. They are the bridge between traditional cloud infrastructure and a new model of internet-scale compute. ICP ♾️ by @DFINITY is not trying to be another blockchain. $ICP ♾️ is not waiting to be discovered. It is building the conditions for a supply shock in plain sight. ♾️ $ICP ♾️ The Swiss Army Knife of blockchains. @JeffBezos @Marmightlite @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @meneseprotocol @caffeineai @dehypokriet @BobbyO_ @PIF_en @Mubadala @aramco @SABIC @Acwa_en @MaadenKSA @SaudiEnergyCare @stcbank_ksa @alrajhibank @snbalahli @RiyadBank @SaudiBanks @AlinmaBanky @BankAlbilad @anb_bank @BankAlJazira @WhiteHouse @POTUS @VP @StateDept @of_dept78357 @DHSgov @USTreasury @CommerceGov @USNavy @usairforce @USMC @USCGHeartland @spaceforcedata @thejointstaff @ChiefsofStaff @USNavyCNO @CMC_MarineCorps @DARPA @NSAGov @CNMF_CyberAlert @NATO @bjoernassmann $ICP #ICP #DFINITY #InternetComputer #ChainFusion #CloudEngines #OnChain #DeFi #AI #CryptoAlpha #Web3 #Blockchain #DePIN #Cloud #CyberSecurity #AI #InternetComputer

@PierreSamaties Anything centralized is 👎👎👎

If you still think centralized stablecoins are fine, you're not paying attention.

@dfinity @circle Dom will fix it, I have every faith.

A judge in a sealed civil lawsuit in New York was persuaded to order Circle to freeze 16 unrelated addresses. One is the ICP ckUSDC minter address. We are currently working with Circle and others to understand what on earth is going on. Thank you for your patience. @circle @zachxbt

Cloud Engines running over AWS could be a huge unlock for $ICP. Not because AWS suddenly becomes outage-proof. The real hopium is this: If $ICP can plug into the infrastructure enterprises already trust and already use, adoption friction drops fast. That means: • easier enterprise entry • faster deployment paths • more real workloads • more on-chain activity • more cycle burn • more demand for ICP utility So the bullish case is not “AWS will never fail.” The bullish case is: $ICP can sit on top of major cloud infrastructure and still bring something AWS alone cannot offer — tamper-resistant software, autonomous services, and blockchain-based execution. If Cloud Engines make ICP easier for governments, enterprises, and large operators to adopt at scale, that is where the real upside starts. Not magic. Not zero downtime. Adoption. And if adoption lands, the market will do the rest. ♾️

@BobbyO_ @ThomasCocirta Yaaaaa Boi ♾️ 🏅

🧵 For anyone who hasn’t seen my GooglePhotos<>ICP video. I would recommend watching that. Bc conceptually it will tie in to my videos about cloud engines. Hypothetically. This would be the easiest way to onboard all institutions/Governments. (Similar to how Google Photos would be the easiest way to onboard a billion Normies and simultaneously migrate their data - with Google keeping their users) Build in a service offering with institutions/Governments existing providers (BigTech Cloud) that enabled the “fusion” of AWS<>ICP but in a way that inherited the benefits of ICP This would also likely be the most efficient way to migrate tons of data that (ideally) gets from where it is now (BigTech Cloud) to ICP BigTech Cloud technically keep their existing clients. And handle the migration/transition to *their new service offering* with Cloud engines - for clients who opt in. Then build in their AI into the new cloud engines. Their AI powers the software. They set everything up for their clients. They just offload (incrementally over time) the expenses and liability that come along with the status quo. This will also make it possible to automate the workforce with AI. If you solve the software problem, and eliminate the need for IT, and manual processes. Bc everything can run on autonomous software. You can get rid of sooo many jobs that are solely dedicated to managing an obsolete software stack. Cloud engines are the endgame Will cover this more in upcoming videos. This was one of the last pieces of the puzzle for me. $ICP $CLOUD ☁️♾️

How cool and crisp this new application. Many thanks @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @dfinity

@PierreSamaties Very clean and smart . Thank you.

@PierreSamaties This is amazing nns.internetcomputer.org

The largest DAO in the world just received a fantastic upgrade!

@dfinity Wow this is amazing 🫶♾️

A reimagined ICP governance experience is live. Today, the governance team is launching a brand-new app designed to make participating in the NNS simpler, faster, and more intuitive. Cleaner UX. Streamlined flows. Built for everyone. Why was this needed?👇

@MikeArtwork @Zero2HeroZombie @caffeineai Always wanted the RS one myself Mike, with a turbo for the early 90's

@ICPLEGEND1966 @Zero2HeroZombie @caffeineai There were some nice fiestas.

2026 will be a Record Year for $ICP & @caffeineai ? (Data & Metrics) youtube.com/watch?v=qA2w0n…

@SmashNiKeR @dominic_w @zucaro_mar83047 @awscloud Day dreaming is a preminision. Keep it up. ♾️🫶

@ICPLEGEND1966 @dominic_w @zucaro_mar83047 @awscloud I can see the Ad in my mind 🚀AWS x ICP: The Era of the Unstoppable Cloud is here Don’t let physical or cyber disruptions take your business down With #ICP Cloud Engines now in the AWS Marketplace, your apps are natively replicated across regions Upgrade to the Digital Fortress

AWS in Bahrain went down after drone hit. The ICP solution coming – apps and services hosted on ICP "cloud engines" running over multiple AWS data centers will be immune. tradingview.com/news/gurufocus…

@SPAWNICP My bipolar Yoyo buddy 🤣🫶♾️

@ICPLEGEND1966 I agree

Anything under $100 $ICP is free money

@dominic_w @zucaro_mar83047 Get those turbos warmed up @dominic_w 🚀

@zucaro_mar83047 The ICP replica/node has been reengineered to run on AWS instances in addition to specialized ICP hardware, so node providers will be able to create nodes on AWS. AWS was incredibly helpful to DFINITY engineering teams and provided special functionality. No deal needed.

@dominic_w There is a silver lining to every cloud 💨

@dominic_w @traxexdoto Great @dominic_w 🫶♾️

@traxexdoto Working hard to *ship* early Q2. — Engines will auto-integrate with Caffeine — Skills for Claude Code, OpenClaw, etc

@Kwt04A All good. I turn out the best and free , factually content that hopefully people enjoy.

@ICPLEGEND1966 Not talking about you bro, thats why i mention some of

$ICP Governance Reminder polite notice. The Mission70 vote showed exactly why blindly following Undecided neurons is a problem for $ICP governance. Final proposal reference: Proposal 140888 Mission70: Demand acceleration and adjustments for voting rewards and node rewards Final recorded result: •Yes: 27.089% •No: 25.987% •Undecided: 46.924% Voting power shown: •Yes voting power: 126,311,842 •No voting power: 121,174,488 That means participating voting power was about: •247,486,330 And of that participating vote: •Yes share of participating votes: about 51.04% •No share of participating votes: about 48.96% So Mission70 passed, but only because the participating vote narrowly cleared the majority line. Now look at the bigger issue: •46.924% of voting power was still marked Undecided at the end •That is nearly half of the displayed vote distribution •The gap between Yes and No was only 1.102 percentage points In other words, on one of the most important recent ICP tokenomics proposals, a huge share of governance influence was not clearly committed, while the actual decisive margin was relatively small. That is exactly why blindly following neurons that stay undecided is bad for the network. It creates three problems: •it weakens your direct say in ICP governance •it reduces accountability in major decisions •it can affect rewards when voting behaviour is weak, delayed, or not properly aligned Governance should not be passive. If you are staking ICP and following other neurons, ask yourself: •Who am I following? •Did they make a clear decision on Proposal 140888? •Did they help produce signal, or just add drift? •Are they protecting my voting power, or wasting it? Mission70 was too important for autopilot governance. Proposal 140888 ended with 27.089% Yes, 25.987% No, and 46.924% Undecided. That alone should be a wake-up call for everyone in ICP. Think about how you vote. Think about who you follow. Because in ICP, blind following does not strengthen decentralisation — it weakens your voice and can cost you rewards.

@Kwt04A Hi Albert, hopefully you are well. You don’t have to doubt me and if you do, please let me know why? 👍🏻

@ICPLEGEND1966 Im start doubting to those people that has icp on there last name. Not all but some, they are the one mostly haveclot of question pointing oug of doubting icp.. very strange