IncomeDen

@jakobjelling Maybe not the same work that you did until now. Maybe accept that DR it's just a made up metric and doesn't do anything for your SEO efforts.

@IncomeDen True - still a lot of work to be done

Yeah🎈 Now 250 linking websites and DR 41.

@Francklp2 @JespernissenSEO How is it impressive?

@JespernissenSEO Impressive! Does it work that well for new substack accounts?

Parasite SEO with Substack is crazy Today I published a small article about Entity stacking seo. I sent it to Primeindexer, and in 4 minutes it shot straight to number one in Google! Even outranking many top websites.. This parasite is so powerful, that you dont even need any backlinks to rank it... #parasiteseo #substack #jespernissenseo

in-house seo: we've never had to buy backlinks the company they work for:

@DavidGQuaid 1) you have at least 30 pages on the site. 2) you have backlinks to the site dating back to Feb-March. 3) there is no competition for the keyword because no traffic. More impressive is the guy under you: just 1 page, just 200 words, zero backlinks, and not even an EMD.

Last week we put a 1 page WordPress site up on palmbeach-investments.com - a domain I bought for $12 Its ranking 1st, above palmbeachinvestments.com EMD all the way baby

@_socialmediamgr how did you end up with this list?

Top Parasites in 2026: 1. Issuu 2. Scribd 3. Dev .to 4. Write .as 5. Calameo 6. Doc droid 7. Slideshare 8. Telegra .ph

Do News Publishers That Block AI Crawlers Get Cited Less Often by AI? "Using data from Citation Labs’ AI citation-tracking tool, XOFU, we examined 4 million citations from 3,600 prompts in ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews, and AI Mode, across 10 industries." buzzstream.com/blog/news-bloc… via @VincetheNero

A whopping 56% of citations on ChatGPT now go to a brand website. It was 8% with GPT-5.3, but it has now increased 7X with GPT-5.4. The data is from Writesonic, which ran 119 conversations and analyzed 1161 citations.

I've just finished analysing over 6,000 Lovable websites and I found one thing in common. I'll save you thousands of dollars and an endless headache. 1. None of them rank. 2. They all have MAJOR indexing issues because of how they are built. 3. All of them have SEO foundational flaws (incorrect schema, page titles that don't pull through correctly, multiple H1 tags). Sure the website looks pretty. But what good is a nice looking shop on the 15th floor of a warehouse? I'd rather have an ugly shop on a busy high street. Be careful if you're looking to move away from WordPress to an AI vibe-coded website, especially if SEO is your main traffic source. This ain't the way to do it.

Alibaba is hyper scaling their /product-insights/ subfolder using AI - let's see where this ends #SEO Both content & even author information seems all AI generated. They are publishing tonnes of these pages every week.

complaining about GEO and having GEO Lead in profile is low-key crazy 😄🙁

New Google update, same spam 🤷

Everyone is building the same thing.

@illyism what happened to the site?

✍️ Year 2 update I built a small news site a few years ago. Nothing fancy. No VC money, no PR. Just a domain, some content, and a bit of SEO. It was a simple test site for SEO: just add some content, find interesting news topics, write about them, and try to rank. I didn’t expect much. I was testing. Then this evening I opened my inbox and saw an email from Nestlé Not a newsletter. Not marketing. A formal letter from their Communications Lead in Vevey, Switzerland. They’d found an article on my site about their baby formula recall and the Henniez water situation. They wanted corrections. They’d listed every point they disagreed with, with links to their own timelines and PDFs. They’d even clarified that their pesticide levels were “one droplet in an Olympic swimming pool” I sat there and laughed 😂 A $250 billion company. A global PR machine. And they’d noticed a small 37DR site that ranked high enough to matter. Someone had searched, found my article, escalated it, and their comms team had spent time drafting a response. That’s when it hit me: distribution isn’t about budget. It’s about being where people look. I didn’t have a newsroom. I didn’t have journalists. I had a domain, some content, and a bit of SEO. And that was enough to get on their radar. Most people think you need a big brand, a media team, or a huge ad spend to be seen. You don’t. You need to rank for the right things. When you do, the right people find you, including the ones you’re writing about. That’s why I care so much about SEO. Not because it’s clever, but because it works. A small site can compete with big players if it’s built and optimized correctly. And when it ranks, it gets noticed. That’s the same idea behind what we do now: SEO strategy & content (magicspace.agency), link building (linkdr.com), AI search visibility (aiseotracker.com), audits (seoroast.com). It’s all about getting your content in front of people who are already looking. No gatekeepers, no media buys, a $10 domain and just ranking. The Nestlé email was a reminder: if you show up where it matters, even the biggest companies will pay attention.

I love the "drop ur startup link" and "promote your site" posts because it's free research material. Many times you can actually find a good niche or keyword with low competition. Keep them coming 👍

If you read nothing else, this section is key. 👇

Percentage of Google visitors who also visited ChatGPT November 2022: Launch December 2022: 1.6% January 2023: 2.9% February 2023: 4.5% March 2023: 5.0% April 2023: 5.7% May 2023: 5.7% June 2023: 5.5% July 2023: 5.0% August 2023: 5.0% September 2023: 5.3% October 2023: 5.5% November 2023: 5.9% December 2023: 5.6% January 2024: 5.5% February 2024: 6.0% March 2024: 6.0% April 2024: 6.3% May 2024: (domain change for ChatGPT) June 2024: 7.9% July 2024: 7.3% August 2024: 7.6% September 2024: 8.7% October 2024: 9.4% November 2024: 10.1% December 2024: 9.9% January 2025: 10.0% February 2025: 10.9% March 2025: 11.2% April 2025: 12.6% May 2025: 12.2% June 2025: 12.6% July 2025: 12.9% August 2025: 14.3% September 2025: 13.8% October 2025: 14.3% November 2025: 14.2% December 2025: 13.5% January 2026: 13.0% February 2026: 14.1% >>

I don’t know what you call them, but these little side tabs are like the emdash of vibe coded UIs

Nearly 90 million search visits wiped out in the last 9 months. And traffic from AI didn't replace even 5% of it. (across ~75k websites connected to free @Ahrefs Web Analytics) Here's how other traffic sources held up: ▪️ Paid traffic is UP 13.8% (188M → 214M) ▪️ Social stayed flat (103M → 105M) ▪️ AI chatbot traffic? Just 4M at its peak Full data breakdown here 👉 chatgpt-vs-google.com Now the big question is: Does search traffic stabilize from here, or do we lose another 15-20% by the end of the year? What's your prediction? ... P.S. Learn more about FREE Web Analytics: ahrefs.com/web-analytics?…

@mddanishyusuf you paid $11 for a useless backlink. go for it 👍

I just listed SuperDev Pro on marketingdb.live (DR 34). Cost me only $11 — instant publish + a solid backlink. Absolute steal.