Indian Air Force

@treeni 180 + girls , meaning every 2 days a “ New Girl “ 🤣🔥🔥🔥 Common guys, give us a break 🙏

SUPER EXCLUSIVE! Amravati Scandal accused Mohammad Ayaan had also shared the stage with AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi! Video from his Instagram account. Mohammad Ayaan Ahmed, Mohammad Joyan and others are accused of exploiting 180+ girls and leaking 350+ videos.

@M0SC0W0 Filariasis

قسوة الحياة قد لاتقتصر على الفقر الذي يجعل المرض البسيط يتحول الى مستعصي ويجعل الحياة اكثر قسوه مشهد لرجل يعاني من مرض غريب جداً حيث أصيب بنوع من الورم في المنطقة الحساسة مما جعل المعاناه مضاعفه بينما اصبحت كل أمنيته في الحياة هو ان يشفى من مرضة .

@DrSJaishankar @narendramodi This guy needs to retire. He is a disgrace to India.

Key #CabinetDecisions taken today under PM @narendramodi’s leadership: ✅ Nutrient-Based Subsidy for current Kharif season set at ₹41,534 crore, an increase of ₹4,317 crore over the previous Kharif season, protecting farmers from global price volatility. ✅ Total equity investment in HPCL Rajasthan Refinery Limited project in Pachpadra, Balotra, Rajasthan raised to ₹119,600 Crore, reducing import dependence of petrochemical sector and driving regional development. ✅ ₹26,070 crore approved for the 1720 MW Kamala Hydroelectric Project on the Subansiri River in Kamle, Kra Daadi and Kurung Kumey, Arunachal Pradesh, boosting clean energy capacity. ✅ ₹14,105.83 crore cleared for the 1200 MW Kalai-II Hydro Electric Project on the Lohit River in Anjaw district, Arunachal Pradesh, enhancing infrastructure and power availability in the region. ✅ Expansion of Jaipur Metro network through a 41-km long Phase-2 North–South corridor at a cost of ₹13,037.66 crore, significantly boosting connectivity in the city.

@IraninHyderabad It has been my wish to see the beautiful ancient architecture of Iran 🇮🇷. Hoping these timeless masterpieces will survive. I will visit Iran after this illegal war is ended.

The Stone Age was far from #Iran.

@supriya_sule @DrSJaishankar @MEAIndia @HCI_London Surprised that you’re tweeting about someone waiting @ The Royal London Hospital 🏥. You should be aware that there is a triage system and if the complaints are trivial, they will be waiting for hours or days. They can’t gate crash. Please don’t entertain such frivial requests.

Indian citizen Nupur Kulkarni and her husband Ivan Sunnam are facing a medical emergency in London. Ivan is admitted at The Royal London Hospital and has been waiting for over 6 hours without a doctor’s consultation. Requesting Hon. @DrSJaishankar ji, @MEAIndia and @HCI_London to kindly extend urgent assistance. Thank you 🙏

@malpani Gen Z ( Gujarat )

Inspiring next gen leadership 😂

@IraninHyderabad I am a layman, scratching my head to see the run way. Where is the improvised runway ???

Only the US can create a false narrative of victory from this scene. Killed many to save one, but couldn't save him.

@RebelliousPari8 You missed the main ingredient.

Need That Kind Of Patience In My Life..😌😌

@ANI He looks and sounds like an idiot. Why we need a discourse from these irrelevant fellows ??

#WATCH | Delhi | On India’s diplomatic handling of Strait of Hormuz crisis, Congress leader Anand Sharma says, "We have to support them. They are holding the tri-colour aloft. They are representing the country. They are working for our people... I think we are balancing it correctly. There's no other way. We can't lean. We can't tilt. That is what is called skillful diplomacy, that everybody is okay with you and we have to keep this continued so the Indian diaspora is safe."

@TinyDhillon Sir, what impact it will have on the Troops in the battle field ? Thanks

When you sack the Army Chief in the midst of a war, proves only one thing … … You are definitely not winning the war.

@softgrowl Amen ( only for Crucification )

Ah! The crucifiction bit is left to be done

@realkaypius This fellow is another idiot and am disgrace to the country

Goes in uniform to swamijis who want PoK as “dakshina”. Replaces legendary 1971 victory pic in his office with a pedestrian caricature of medieval folklore. When trolled for repeated indiscretions, visits temple in civvies & drags in an entire secular force. How low is too low?

@TigerCharlii It will be better to give a short background story about the reasons of his martyrdom.

Sad News! India lost Braveheart Agniveer Aadesh Kumar ( Indian Army ) He hailed from Mathura, Uttar Pradesh Salute 🇮🇳 #IndianArmy

@FurkanGozukara Yes, I remember that period. When Manishsnkar Aiyer, the Petrochemical Minister of India, signed the deal in Tehran and landed in NewDelhi, he was sacked under pressure from USA and Bush administration.

Absolute bombshell. The US intentionally sabotaged a massive gas pipeline between Iran, Pakistan, and India just to isolate Tehran. George W. Bush literally bribed India with nuclear plants and McDonald's to pull out of the deal. They made today's global energy crisis!

@SupriyaShrinate Agree with your assessment, but be careful while retweeting someone else’s message. Gork says this photo of the jet is an old one.

A terror haven like Pakistan is centre stage - but India is not. Unacceptable

@ANI With Iran 🇮🇷 displaying its ability to target 🎯 Diego Garcia, which is 4000 miles away, Vishwa Guru should develop diarrhea before he develops any thoughts of servicing the US Navy fleet in one of India’s Shipyards.

#WATCH | Gurugram | On the conflict in West Asia, Maj Gen (Dr)GD Bakshi (Retd.) says, "...US has got stuck in an endless protracted war. The global economy is hit by the war...The prices of oil are soaring due to the blockage of the Strait of Hormuz...The mid-term elections will also show the reality of this war...Donald Trump, after assuming the presidency, has launched attacks on 7-8 countries...The entire world is suffering..."

@SupriyaShrinate I am getting confused. Too many brothers in the Middle East and thank God, we have only one “ Father Land ( so far )😂

How about telling your lumpen rogue elements here in India to behave themselves and stop spewing venom against Muslims Or is a Qatari Muslim your ‘brother’ and Indian Muslim an enemy? Indian Muslims are also celebrating Eid!

@balbirpunj @RahulGandhi @narendramodi @AmitShah @NitinNabin @DrMohanBhagwat @myogiadityanath @rajnathsingh @kharge @priyankagandhi @Jairam_Ramesh @INCOverseas What nonsense is this ? Twitter is becoming a dustbin

An Open Letter To @RahulGandhi Dear Rahul ji, I write with candour, yet with due regard for the office you occupy as Leader of the Opposition in the #LokSabha. In any parliamentary democracy, this office is not meant merely to oppose, but to scrutinise rigorously, question the government of the day, fearlessly, and do so while safeguarding national interest. A mature democracy requires both - a strong government and a credible opposition. When either falters, democratic balance weakens. Unfortunately, I must say that the dignity of the office has declined since your takeover, due to your conduct and statements that appear impulsive, theatrical, and lacking a solid grounding in facts or historical knowledge. My concern is not limited to a single incident. The pattern predates 2014 and indicates a deeper intellectual attitude—one that is sometimes disconnected from historical realities and national sensitivities. In 2010, diplomatic cables released by #WikiLeaks recorded that you told the US Ambassador that radicalised “Hindu groups” posed a “bigger threat” to India than the Pakistani terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba— responsible for the horrific 2008 Mumbai 26/11. This disclosure came when India was still scarred by the Godhra train burning, where fifty-nine pilgrims were burnt alive by jihadist. Yet, instead of confronting Islamist extremism with clarity, a fake counter-narrative of “saffron terror” was constructed, even casting suspicion on organisations such as the @RSSorg. The 2007 affidavit questioning the historicity of Lord #Ram further reflected a disturbing intellectual drift. In a continuity of this disposition, you and your family chose to absent yourselves from the historic 2024 #RamTemple Pran-Pratishtha ceremony at Ram Mandir Ayodhya. In 2013, the country witnessed an extraordinary spectacle. During PM #ManmohanSingh’s tenure, you publicly dismissed your party-led Cabinet-approved ordinance as “complete nonsense” that should be “torn up and thrown away.” The ordinance had already been cleared by the Cabinet and the Congress leadership. Democracy welcomes dissent; it also demands institutional respect. Where do you get such arrogance? From a sense of entitlement owing to your dynastic roots? More recently, on 13 March last in Lucknow, while commemorating #KanshiRam’s birth anniversary, you suggested that had #JawaharlalNehru been alive, Kanshi Ram might have become Chief Minister through the @INCIndia. The claim surprised many observers — not just because it was speculative, but because it overlooked Kanshi Ram’s political journey and the historic disdain of Congress for dissenting Dalit voices outside its organisational structure. In 1994, I had the opportunity to meet Kanshi Ram several times. Each interaction lasted hours. These meetings were facilitated by a Dalit leader from South India who then served as a minister in the government of P. V. Narasimha Rao and remains associated with your party even today. Kanshi Ram impressed me as a man uniquely dedicated to Dalit empowerment. Unlike many politicians who see power as an end in itself, he viewed political office solely as a tool for social change. Personal ambition did not motivate him. He politely declined an offer to move to Rashtrapati Bhavan, made by Atal Behari Vajpayee. Ultimately, he trusted his movement to Mayawati, whom he believed could continue the struggle. The analogy you used in your speech—holding a pen vertically to symbolise hierarchy and horizontally to represent equality—was actually Kanshi Ram’s favourite metaphor. I remember him demonstrating it vividly during our conversations. Invoking Nehru in this context, however, appeared historically misplaced. Kanshi Ram built his politics precisely because he believed the Congress system had failed Dalits. The historical relationship between Congress leadership and Dr B. R. Ambedkar also deserves reflection. Kanshi Ram regarded #Ambedkar as his greatest inspiration. Yet Ambedkar’s political experience with #Congress leaders—particularly Nehru—was marked by sharp tensions. Nehru had no hesitation in awarding himself the Bharat Ratna in 1955. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s Constitution, received the same honour only in 1990—thirty-five years later—under the government of V. P. Singh, which was supported from outside, by the Bhartiya Janta Party and the left. Ambedkar’s entry into the first Cabinet of independent India occurred largely because Mahatma Gandhi insisted that the new government must include distinguished non-Congress figures. Thus, Ambedkar served alongside leaders such as Syama Prasad Mukherjee and Sardar Baldev Singh. The 1952 general election further highlights the relationship. After resigning from the Cabinet, Ambedkar contested from North Bombay. The Congress fielded Narayan Sadoba Kajrolkar against him. Ambedkar lost by around fourteen thousand votes, while over 75000 ballots were declared invalid. It was probably the first case of vote chori (theft), scandalising independent India in its very first election to Lok Sabha. Compounding the hostility, Congress and Communist leaders called Ambedkar a “traitor.” Yet such accusations were not entirely novel. Writing to Rajkumari Amrit Kaur on January 26, 1946, Nehru himself remarked that Ambedkar had “allied himself with the British Government against the Congress.” Savita Ambedkar records in her autobiography that Nehru was “keeping a sharp eye on the constituency” during the 1952 election. According to her account, Nehru, S.K. Patil and Dange were determined to ensure Ambedkar’s defeat. Nehru himself appeared jubilant with the outcome. In a letter to Lady #Edwina #Mountbatten dated January 16, 1952, he wrote: “In Bombay city and to a larger extent in Bombay province, our success has been far greater than expected. Ambedkar has been dropped out.” #RahulGandhi ji, please ask yourself: Why was Nehru celebrating Ambedkar’s electoral defeat? I am not implying anything, but I wonder why he was happily sharing the news of Ambedkar’s loss with a woman, who was the consort of a colonial ruler responsible for planning and executing India’s partition, and had then left Indian shores for her country. Hopefully, you know the answer. Ambedkar’s anguish is recorded by his biographer Dhananjay Keer in ‘Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Life and Mission’. Ambedkar lamented that Congress leaders routinely branded him a “traitor”. In contrast, Mahatma Gandhi once told him: “I know you are a patriot of sterling worth.” In this context, your recent demand for the Bharat Ratna for Kanshi Ram raises questions about consistency. When Mayawati made the same request in 2008, the Congress-led UPA government rejected it, arguing that such honours should not be subject to lobbying. Why were you silent then? Today, the same demand, raised by you on the eve of Uttar Pradesh elections, seemingly appears insincere and driven by political opportunism. Kanshi Ram himself had little faith in the Congress. In his 1982 book ‘Chamcha Yug’, he accused the party of cultivating “stooge” Dalit leaders who served its interests rather than empowering the community. Your rhetorical framework often echoes familiar ideological clichés about India’s civilisation. This has repeatedly led to judicial corrections. Your remarks linking the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh to Gandhi’s assassination required clarification in court. The “Chowkidar Chor Hai” episode led to an apology to the Supreme Court. Your statements on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar invited judicial caution. Criticism is legitimate, and indeed a vibrant democracy’s lifeline. However, undermining the nation while trying to criticise the government, echoing external prejudices, and making baseless accusations against political rivals and ideological opponents fall into a different category. It's an irresponsible behaviour unworthy of a credible leader. Your endorsement of foreign criticism describing India as a “dead economy” raised concerns about national disparagement. Your remarks abroad suggesting that “Sikhs may not freely practise their faith in India” were swiftly appropriated by hostile elements. Most alarming was your assertion that your party is fighting not merely the @BJP4India or #RSS, but the “Indian State”—a formulation historically invoked by insurgent movements. In 2018, you made an unsubstantiated claim in the Rafale matter, invoking the French President—swiftly contradicted by the French government. In 2017, during the Doklam standoff, you met the Chinese Ambassador, with your party first denying and then admitting the meeting. During foreign visits, Rahulji, you have expressed concern that Western powers no longer comment on India’s internal affairs and have repeatedly described India as merely a “union of states” — not as a nation. This is less a constitutional observation and more an intellectual stance that diminishes India’s civilisational continuity — a doctrine Gandhiji often emphasised and strived for. Even recent episodes— such as the conduct of Youth Congress activists at an international forum, followed by your approving remark—suggest a troubling preference for spectacle over seriousness. You have warned that India would “burn” if BJP return to power and questioned constitutional stability. After electoral defeats, you and your party have cast doubts on institutions such as the Election Commission. Opposition is legitimate; delegitimising institutions is not. Your parliamentary conduct has occasionally reinforced perceptions of theatricality—the 2018 embrace of the Prime Minister followed by a wink, or recent public gestures that prioritised superficial optics over substantive politics. Your renewed emphasis on redistribution slogans such as “jitni abaadi, utna haq” raises further concern. History offers a cautionary lesson. Under Indira Gandhi, excessive nationalisation weakened production, fuelled shortages, and culminated in the Indian Emergency. Redistribution without wealth creation destroys the very foundation it seeks to distribute. The test of leadership lies not in applause, but in arguments that withstand scrutiny—historical, judicial, and intellectual. India deserves an opposition that challenges the government with seriousness—not slogans; with evidence—not conjecture; with statesmanship—not theatrics. As Leader of the Opposition, you have a rare opportunity to elevate national discourse. That responsibility demands intellectual discipline, historical awareness, and an unwavering commitment to the dignity of the Republic. I hope you will reflect—not as a matter of partisan disagreement, but as an appeal to restore seriousness to India’s political conversation. Yours sincerely, @DattaHosabale @sgurumurthy @mediasurya @ARanganathan72 @jsaideepak @RajeevKSachan @yv_post @AMISHDEVGAN @sardesairajdeep @rajkamaljha @republic @anjanaomkashyap @sudhirchaudhary @Mayawati @bspindia @amitmalviya @KanchanGupta @nishikant_dubey @SudhanshuTrived @RatanSharda55 @ShashiTharoor @SupriyaShrinate @Pawankhera @himantabiswa @annamalai_k @CTRavi_BJP @Tejasvi_Surya @OpIndia_com @SwarajyaMag

@rwac48 It’s not a hair cut. This Thug should be thrown in the strait of Hormuz and we will see his shape.

Gibberish!

@rwac48 This fellow is an IDIOT